Belgium - First Division BVan RoystadionData current as of November 02, 2026

FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk II: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
1 : 1half-time 0:1
KRC Genk II crest
KRC Genk II

FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FCV Dender EH played against KRC Genk II in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on November 1, 2026. Venue: Van Roystadion. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

FCV Dender EH has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. KRC Genk II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

FCV Dender EH scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 0.29. KRC Genk II scores 1.50 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 3.17 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 14% of FCV Dender EH's games and 50% of KRC Genk II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 75%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FCV Dender EH has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.38 per game. FCV Dender EH takes 15.3 shots per game, while KRC Genk II takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

FCV Dender EH leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. KRC Genk II leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

FCV Dender EH's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For KRC Genk II, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 3.17 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FCV Dender EH sit 2nd in the table and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while 11th-placed KRC Genk II have managed just 1 win over the same period. The hosts have won all 4 of their home games, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding none; the visitors have lost 3 of their 4 away matches, conceding an average of 2.5 goals per game. Dender average 5.25 shots on target per home match, compared with Genk II's 3.5 on the road, further supporting the case for greater attacking efficiency from the hosts. The quality of chances created also favors Dender: their home xG is 1.39, while their opponents' away xG is 1.01. However, the hosts' xG conceded of 1.36 suggests their goalless run may be difficult to sustain. A home win remains the most likely outcome, particularly as Genk II have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to the visitors potentially failing to score: KRC Genk II have failed to find the net in 50% of their matches, while FCV Dender EH have kept a clean sheet in 50% of theirs. In their last five matches, the hosts conceded an average of just 0.4 goals, while the visitors scored an average of 1.0, further limiting KRC Genk II’s chances of scoring. At the same time, Dender averaged 2.2 goals scored over this period, and Genk II conceded 1.2, so the hosts scoring looks more likely than a goalless draw. Although the season-long rate of matches in which both teams scored is 50% for each side, the figures in their last five matches were 0% and 20%, respectively. Therefore, the pick is BTTS - No: at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Dender score an average of 1.75 goals at home, while Genk II concede 2.50 goals away, pointing to strong scoring potential for the hosts. The xG figures support this: Dender have an attacking xG of 1.76, while Genk II allow 1.92 xG. At least two goals were scored in 75% of both teams’ matches, and the league average is 3.15 goals per game. Caution is warranted with higher goal lines, as Dender have conceded an average of just 0.40 goals across their last five matches. Therefore, Over 1.5 goals offers a clearer edge than Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is FCV Dender EH leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged 1.2 goals before half-time and led in two games, while KRC Genk II averaged 0.4 first-half goals and were trailing at half-time three times. The hosts’ advantage is reflected in their average xG of 1.76 compared with the visitors’ 1.01, as well as 5.5 shots on target per match versus 3.5. After the break, Dender average 1.0 goals scored and 0.25 conceded, whereas Genk II concede an average of 1.5 goals in this period, which favors the hosts holding on to their lead. The hosts have won four of their last five matches, while the visitors have won just one. However, a half-time draw remains a notable alternative, as Dender were level at the break in two of their last five matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
22Shots11
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
4Shots on target3
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
2.18xG1.29
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
7Corners6
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
73Dangerous attacks53
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
14Fouls7
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
3Cards2
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
1.57Goals scored / game1.5
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0.29Goals allowed / game1.88
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
46%Average possession47%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
5.86Shots on target / game4.5
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.29Shots per game11.88
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
5.86Shots on target4.5
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
10.3%Shot conversion12.6%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
46%Possession47%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
1.76xG for1.38
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
1.24xG against1.69
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: AttackingKRC Genk II: Counter-attacking
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
Accuracy (shots on target)38%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FCV Dender EH is 200% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1 pts / game - KRC Genk II

FCV Dender EH
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
86% W0% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-0-1
2.57 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-0
Last 5 at home
4-0-0
WWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
KRC Genk II
WLDLD
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FCV Dender EH is 5% better for: goals scored per game.

1.57 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.5 goals / game - KRC Genk II

FCV Dender EH is 548% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.29 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.88 goals / game - KRC Genk II

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: very strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).

KRC Genk II scoring profile: more difficult

KRC Genk II scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 games), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 games).

11Goals scored (season)12
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
2Goals conceded (season)15
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
1.86Average goals per game3.38
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
9Goals scored (last 5)5
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal63%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
57%2 goals50%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
14%3 goals25%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0%4 goals13%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

How often they concede at least...

29%1 goal75%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0%2 goals63%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0%3 goals38%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0%4 goals13%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time38%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0%BTTS in both halves25%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
57%Scored in both halves38%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
20%BTTS - last 520%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time63%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FCV Dender EH is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1 pts / game - KRC Genk II

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing
KRC Genk II - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per game (1st half)1
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.75
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)1
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
1Average goals (1st half)1.75
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
71%Clean sheet before half-time25%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
43%No goal before half-time50%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

After half-time (2nd half)

2.71Points per game (2nd half)1.5
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.63
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
100%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II
14%No goal after half-time50%
FCV Dender EHKRC Genk II

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

86% W14% D0% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 86%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KRC Genk II - second-half results

38% W38% D25% L
8
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.803.00
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.0
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
KRC Genk II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.60
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

KRC Genk II
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
0
3
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.62
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.95
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
22%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

KRC Genk II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaKRC Genk II
Average goals per game▼ 1.863.17▲ 3.38
Both teams scored▼ 14%53%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 29%63%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▲ 71%25%• 25%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%78%▲ 88%
Goal after half-time• 86%86%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.17
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.85
Home goals / game
1.32
Away goals / game
+40%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHYellow cardMalcolm Viltard
  2. KRC Genk IIGoalAugust De Wannemacker
  3. FCV Dender EHYellow cardGerard Vandeplas
  4. KRC Genk IIYellow cardDjoully Nzoko
  5. FCV Dender EHGoalAdam NhailiAssist: Gerard Vandeplas
  6. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Christian AkpanOff: Yaimar Abel Medina Ortiz
  7. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Kembo DiliwidiOff: Krzysztof Koton
  8. FCV Dender EHYellow cardBo De Kerf
  9. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Pedro Injai GomesOff: Bo De Kerf
  10. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Emmanuel Mballa AmougouOff: Gerard Vandeplas
  11. KRC Genk IIYellow cardJelle Driessen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk II?

The First Division B match finished FCV Dender EH 1:1 KRC Genk II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk II?

FCV Dender EH score 1.57 goals per game on average and KRC Genk II 1.50. The First Division B average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 14% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 50% of KRC Genk II's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and KRC Genk II in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and KRC Genk II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs KRC Genk II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.