Belgium - First Division BVan RoystadionData current as of November 03, 2026

FCV Dender EH vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden

FCV Dender EH vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FCV Dender EH played against Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on September 20, 2026. Venue: Van Roystadion. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

FCV Dender EH has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Patro Eisden has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

FCV Dender EH scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 0.40. Patro Eisden scores 1.40 and allows 2.20. Games in this league average 3.12 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 20% of FCV Dender EH's games and 100% of Patro Eisden's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 100%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FCV Dender EH has the higher season xG average, 1.96 to 1.29 per game. FCV Dender EH takes 17.2 shots per game, while Patro Eisden takes 12.6.

First-half and second-half trends

FCV Dender EH leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Patro Eisden leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.20 after halftime.

When the teams score

FCV Dender EH's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Patro Eisden, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 3.12 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FCV Dender EH have won 4 of their last 5 matches and sit 2nd, while Patro Eisden have suffered 4 defeats in their last five games and are 13th in the table. The hosts have won both of their home matches so far, scoring an average of 2 goals and yet to concede, whereas the visitors have lost every away game, conceding an average of 3 goals. Dender’s superiority is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.52, while Patro Eisden allow opponents an xG of 2.12. The visitors can score an average of 1.5 goals away from home, but their 1.32 xG and just 4 shots on target per match may not be enough against the hosts’ highly resilient defense. The most likely scenario is a controlled FCV Dender EH victory, probably with a clean sheet or conceding no more than one goal.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data strongly supports goals at both ends: both FCV Dender EH and Patro Eisden recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches, and neither team kept a clean sheet. Patro Eisden concede as many as 3.00 goals per match on average, with an xG against of 2.12, which significantly increases the hosts’ chances of scoring. The visitors should also find the net, as they average 4.0 shots on target and score 1.50 goals per match, while Dender’s defense allowed opponents to score 1.67 goals per game this season. The main risk to BTTS - Yes is the hosts’ excellent current defensive form: they have conceded just 0.4 goals across their last five matches and recorded BTTS in only 20% of them. Despite this improvement, Patro’s defensive weakness and their run of five consecutive matches with BTTS at 100% give a slight edge to the scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have gone above this line in 100% of their matches so far this season. Patro Eisden has conceded an average of 2.2 goals in its last 5 matches, while its average xG conceded stands at 1.51, which supports the expectation of at least two goals for the home side. FCV Dender EH has recently created chances worth an average of 1.96 xG per match, clearly higher than Patro Eisden’s 1.27 xG. Caution is advised with higher lines due to Dender’s strong defensive record in its last 5 matches, in which it conceded just 0.4 goals per game, and the fact that only 20% of its matches during this period produced Over 2.5 goals. The projected total of 2.70 goals points to an advantage for Over 1.5, while Over 2.5 remains a moderately risky selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a win for FCV Dender EH, as the hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Patro Eisden have lost 4 times during that period. Dender have conceded an average of just 0.4 goals over their last five matches, whereas the visitors have allowed their opponents to score 2.2 goals per game. In the first halves, the hosts have drawn 40% of their recent matches, while Patro Eisden have not led at the break on any occasion and have gone into half-time behind in as many as 60% of their games. After the interval, Dender have scored an average of 0.8 goals and conceded none, while Patro Eisden have conceded 1.4 goals per match during that period. In addition, the visitors’ xG against stands at 2.12 compared with 1.13 for Dender, clearly supporting the hosts’ advantage in the final outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
12Shots18
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
4Shots on target0
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
1.39xG1.44
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
4Corners5
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
46Dangerous attacks42
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
18Fouls21
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
3Cards5
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
1.4Goals scored / game1.4
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0.4Goals allowed / game2.2
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
47%Average possession35%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
6.4Shots on target / game3.4
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

17.2Shots per game12.6
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
6.4Shots on target3.4
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
8.1%Shot conversion11.1%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
47%Possession35%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
1.96xG for1.29
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
1.11xG against1.52
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: AttackingPatro Eisden: Balanced
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)37%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FCV Dender EH is 300% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 0.6 pts / game - Patro Eisden

FCV Dender EH
LWWWW
Season result split
80% W0% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Patro Eisden
WLLLL
Season result split
20% W0% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FCV Dender EH is 450% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.4 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 2.2 goals / game - Patro Eisden

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: very strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 games).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: strong

Patro Eisden scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 games).

7Goals scored (season)7
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
2Goals conceded (season)11
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
1.8Average goals per game3.6
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
7Goals scored (last 5)7
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
2Goals conceded (last 5)11
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
60%2 goals40%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%3 goals0%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%4 goals0%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal100%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%2 goals80%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%3 goals20%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%4 goals20%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%BTTS in both halves20%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
60%Scored in both halves20%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
20%BTTS - last 5100%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FCV Dender EH is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 0.4 pts / game - Patro Eisden

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per game (1st half)0.4
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.2
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
1Average goals (1st half)1
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
60%Clean sheet before half-time20%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
40%No goal before half-time80%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

2.6Points per game (2nd half)1
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
0.8Average goals (2nd half)2.6
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
100%Clean sheet after half-time20%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden
20%No goal after half-time0%
FCV Dender EHPatro Eisden

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

80% W20% D0% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.60
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.0
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Patro Eisden - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.00
Goals scored / game0.21.2
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game1.02.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.85
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.71
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
28%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
57% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
57%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals per game▼ 1.803.12▲ 3.60
Both teams scored▼ 20%56%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 20%63%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 60%23%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%78%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 80%88%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.12
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / game
1.41
Away goals / game
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHYellow cardKobe Cools
  2. Patro EisdenYellow cardLouis Verstraete
  3. Patro EisdenYellow cardSami Lahssaini
  4. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Adam NhailiOff: Amine Daali
  5. Patro EisdenYellow cardStef Peeters
  6. FCV Dender EHYellow cardBo De Kerf
  7. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Gerard VandeplasOff: Emmanuel Mballa Amougou
  8. Patro EisdenYellow cardZakaria Atteri
  9. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Jeremy Loteteka BokilaOff: Zakaria Atteri
  10. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Pjotr KestensOff: Krzysztof Koton
  11. FCV Dender EHGoalAdam Nhaili
  12. Patro EisdenYellow cardSami Lahssaini
  13. FCV Dender EHYellow cardMartin Expérience

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished FCV Dender EH 1:0 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs Patro Eisden?

FCV Dender EH score 1.40 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.40. The First Division B average is 3.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 20% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 100% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Patro Eisden 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs Patro Eisden?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.