FH vs ÍA: match statistics
FH vs ÍA: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FH played against ÍA in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on May 29, 2026. Venue: Kaplakrikavöllur. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
FH has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. ÍA has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
FH scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 3.13. ÍA scores 1.38 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.84 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of FH's games and 75% of ÍA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 88% and 75%, compared with league averages of 70% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
ÍA has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.53 per game. FH takes 12.1 shots per game, while ÍA takes 14.1.
First-half and second-half trends
FH leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. ÍA leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.13 after halftime.
When the teams score
FH's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For ÍA, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 3.84 goals. Both teams score in 70% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FH has failed to win at home this season (0 wins, 2 draws, 6 losses), averaging 2.0 goals scored and 3.0 conceded per home match; in the last 5 home fixtures they conceded 19 goals (3.8 per game). ÍA shows a better run: 9 goals in their last 5 matches (1.8 per game) and an average of 1.6 points per game over that period; away they score 1.4 and concede 2.0 per match. In terms of chance quality, FH’s home xG is 1.88 with 15 shots on average (5 on target) and a conversion rate of 13%, while ÍA’s away xG is 1.56 with 12.8 shots (5.4 on target) and an 11% conversion — hosts create slightly more opportunities but the difference is marginal. The visitors’ main advantage is defense and form: FH’s home xG against is 2.32 and they actually concede a lot (25 this season, 19 in the last 5), whereas ÍA’s xG against is 1.64 and they conceded 9 in the last 5, indicating greater defensive resilience. Considering FH’s 0.2 points per game in the last 5 versus ÍA’s 1.6 and the discrepancy in goals conceded (19 vs 9), I predict an away win; probabilities estimated at ~65% for ÍA, 20% for draw and 15% for FH.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal indicates BTTS - Yes: FH has 100% of matches this season with both teams scoring, ÍA has 60% season-wide and 100% in the last 5 matches, while the league average is 70%. Both sides defend poorly – each concedes on average 2.0 goals per season, with FH conceding 3.8 goals on average over the last 5 matches and ÍA averaging 1.8 goals scored in their last 5, increasing the likelihood of goals from both teams. xG supports this: FH has xG 1.86 per match with xG against 1.6, and ÍA has xG 1.56 with xG against 1.64; in the last 5 fixtures ÍA’s xG is 1.97 while FH’s xG against is 2.32, so both sides create chances. Additionally, clean sheets for both teams this season are 0%, matches over 2.5 goals occur in 67% for FH and 80% for ÍA, and shots on target are approximately 5.7 and 5.4 respectively, all pointing to a high probability of goal exchange. Based on this, I estimate BTTS probability at 80% for Yes vs 20% for No, therefore I recommend a 'yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals: home 1.75, away 1.58, total 3.33 — which is 0.83 above the 2.5 line and 0.17 below the 3.5 line. A Poisson model with lambda = 3.33 yields estimates: Over 1.5 ≈84.5%, Over 2.5 ≈64.7%, and Over 3.5 ≈42.7%. Seasonal data confirm the offensive profile: FH has xG 1.86, an average of 5.67 shots on target and 100% of matches over 1.5; ÍA has xG 1.56, 5.4 shots on target and 80% of matches over 1.5; in the last 5 matches both teams registered 100% Over 2.5. Considering the Poisson output and these seasonal indicators (67% and 80% Over 2.5 in the season, league average 3.84 goals per match), I uplift the probability to ~89% for Over 1.5 and ~75% for Over 2.5, while assessing Over 3.5 at about 45%. Conclusion: the strongest signal is the Over at 1.5, since 3.33 expected goals and high seasonal Over rates give a clear edge to that side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The first half is expected to be low-scoring: the home side averages 0.33 goals by half-time versus 0.2 for the away side, so a draw at the break is the logical scenario. The second half produces the most goals — the average second-half goals are 2.67 for hosts and 2.8 for visitors, and over 0.5 goals in the second half occurs for hosts in 100% of cases and for visitors in 80%. The away team performs significantly better after the break: they have collected 6 points in second halves versus 1 point for the hosts (6.0 vs 1.0), and in the last 5 matches the hosts have failed to win (form: l d l l l, 0 wins) while the visitors have 2 wins (w l d w d). Although the hosts’ xG is 1.86 versus 1.56 for the visitors, the visitors have higher shot efficiency (11% vs 8%), and the hosts concede an average of 3.8 goals over the last 5 matches compared to 1.8 scored by the visitors, increasing the likelihood of a turnaround after the break. For these reasons the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and an away win (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FH | ÍA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
ÍA is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - FH · 1.4 pts / game - ÍA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FH is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - FH · 1.38 goals / game - ÍA
ÍA is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.
3.13 goals / game - FH · 2 goals / game - ÍA
FH scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while ÍA keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 meczów).
ÍA scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FH
Over / Under - ÍA
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ÍA is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / game - FH · 1.13 pts / game - ÍA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FH - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
ÍA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FH
ÍA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| FH | Liga | ÍA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.63 | 3.84 | ▼ 3.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 70% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 88% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 16% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 88% | • 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from FH's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against ÍA. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FH vs ÍA?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 0:1 ÍA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FH and ÍA?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches FH won 2, ÍA won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FH vs ÍA?
FH score 1.50 goals per game on average and ÍA 1.38. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 75% of FH's matches and 75% of ÍA's.
What form are FH and ÍA in?
Over the last 5 games FH have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and ÍA 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs ÍA?
The statistical background for FH vs ÍA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.