FH vs KA: match statistics
FH vs KA: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FH played against KA in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Venue: Kaplakrikavöllur. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
FH has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. KA has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
FH scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 3.00. KA scores 1.17 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.92 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 83% of FH's games and 50% of KA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 33%, compared with league averages of 71% for BTTS and 74% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FH has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.49 per game. FH takes 13.0 shots per game, while KA takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
FH leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. KA leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
FH's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For KA, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 3.92 goals. Both teams score in 71% of games, and 74% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (2): KA has a clear defensive edge and a superior league position — 6th vs 11th for FH — and concedes only 0.5 goals per away match on average, while the hosts concede 4.0 goals per home match. In the last 5 games KA recorded 2 wins and averages 1.4 points per match, whereas FH have not won any of their last 5 and average just 0.2 points per match. Offensively FH are dangerous at home (avg. 3.0 goals scored, 13 shots and 5 on target per match, with a 23% conversion), but their home xG is only 1.83 versus xG against 2.38, indicating defensive instability. KA away have xG 1.64 and xG against 1.9 and keep a clean sheet in 50% of away matches, suggesting better defensive balance. Considering the gap in average goals conceded (4.0 vs 0.5), the points advantage over the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 0.2) and superior defensive organization, I give KA a 65% chance to win, draw 15% and home win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS (Both Teams To Score - Yes) arises from league context and form: the league has 72% of matches with both teams scoring, both teams’ season BTTS is 50%, and in the last 5 matches both have 60% BTTS. FH averages 1.25 goals scored and concedes 1.75 seasonally, but in the last 5 matches concedes 3.8 goals on average (19 goals in 5 matches), while KA scores 1.0 and concedes 0.5 for the season, yet in the last 5 concedes 1.0 (5 goals) and scores 1.2 on average. xG comparison shows KA generates 1.64 xG while FH’s defense allows 1.61 xG, so KA should create scoring chances; concurrently FH generates 1.42 xG versus KA’s defense that allows 1.9 xG, increasing FH’s chance of scoring as well. Both teams average about 14 shots per match (13.75 and 14.0) with 4–4.5 shots on target and conversion rates of 9% for FH vs 7% for KA, providing realistic conversion chances for both sides. Given the league 72% BTTS, recent 60% for both teams and FH’s particularly severe defensive issues (3.8 conceded in 5), I recommend BTTS - Yes with a probability of 70%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimated expected goals at 1.66 for FH and 1.63 for KA (total 3.29) — calculated from average xG: FH offensive xG 1.42 and KA conceded xG 1.90 yield 1.66, while KA offensive xG 1.64 and FH conceded xG 1.61 yield 1.63. FH conceded 19 goals in the last 5 matches (3.8 per game on average) and all those fixtures had Over 2.5 goals; KA’s last 5 show an offensive xG of 1.79, and both teams scored in 60% of their last 5 matches. Seasonally FH has 100% of matches Over 1.5 goals, KA 50%, and the league averages 4.0 goals per game, which further favors high-scoring outcomes. With a total goals expectation of 3.29, a Poisson distribution gives roughly an 84% chance of Over 1.5, about 64% for Over 2.5 and about 42% for Over 3.5, which statistically supports the Over side. For these reasons I recommend playing Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side: Over) as the most probable and strongest available signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics show draws dominate at half-time — hosts were level at the break in 50% of matches and visitors also in 50%, so a half-time draw is the most likely scenario. The full-time outcome favors the away side: visitors won 50% of matches and average 2.0 points per game versus 0.75 for hosts, while conceding only 0.5 goals per game on average, indicating solid defensive form. The visitors also have a higher xG (1.64 vs. 1.42 for the hosts) and score on average 1.0 goal in the second half compared to 0.5 for the hosts, which increases their chances of clawing back or turning the result around after the break. Hosts, however, score more often before half-time (on average 0.75 goals by half-time and 6 first-half goals for hosts versus 1 for visitors), therefore the scenario of a draw at half-time and an away win by full-time (X/2) is the most logical. Based on this I assign X/2 the highest probability (30%), with the remaining outcomes allocated smaller shares.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FH | KA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KA is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - FH · 1.4 pts / game - KA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FH is 56% better for: goals scored per game.
1.83 goals / game - FH · 1.17 goals / game - KA
KA is 126% better for: goals allowed per game.
3 goals / game - FH · 1.33 goals / game - KA
FH scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
KA scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FH
Over / Under - KA
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KA is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - FH · 1 pts / game - KA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FH - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
KA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 3.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FH
KA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| FH | Liga | KA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.83 | 3.92 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 16% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from FH's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against KA. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FH vs KA?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 1:2 KA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FH and KA?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches FH won 1, KA won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FH vs KA?
FH score 1.83 goals per game on average and KA 1.17. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 83% of FH's matches and 50% of KA's.
What form are FH and KA in?
Over the last 5 games FH have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and KA 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs KA?
The statistical background for FH vs KA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


