FH vs Thór: match statistics
FH vs Thór: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FH played against Thór in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on June 21, 2026. Venue: Kaplakrikavöllur. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
FH has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Thór has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
FH scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 2.70. Thór scores 0.80 and allows 2.70. Games in this league average 4.05 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of FH's games and 50% of Thór's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 70%, compared with league averages of 71% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FH has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.23 per game. FH takes 12.5 shots per game, while Thór takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
FH leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Thór leads at halftime in 10% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
FH's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Thór, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 4.05 goals. Both teams score in 71% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FH has a clear advantage in chance creation and quality of scoring opportunities: at home they average 15 shots and 3.67 on target per match versus Thór’s 10.4 shots and 3.2 on target away, and their average xG is 1.78 compared to the visitors’ 1.16. This translates into greater offensive efficiency — the hosts score 1.33 goals per home match, while Thór scores 0.8 goals away, and the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches versus 33% for hosts. Both teams, however, have defensive issues: FH concedes 2.33 goals on average at home, and Thór concedes as many as 3.4 away; in the last 5 matches FH has conceded 14 goals and Thór 16, indicating a high number of shots on target and high-danger situations. Recent form favors the hosts — FH has 1 win and 3 goals scored in the last 5 matches with 0.6 points per match in that period, while Thór has not won any match and averages 0 points per match. Considering the higher xG (1.78 vs 1.16), more shots (15 vs 10.4) and superior goal conversion (1.33 vs 0.8), I forecast an FH victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The main indicators favor BTTS: league BTTS rate is 71% with an average of 4.05 goals per match, indicating a high scoring environment. FH has a season BTTS of 60% and averages 0.8 goals scored while conceding 2.0 per game; Thór has a BTTS of 40% and also scores 0.8 while conceding 3.4, so both teams are highly vulnerable to conceding. xG shows FH produces 1.29 and allows 1.98 xG, while Thór produces 1.16 and allows 2.56 xG — both sides concede more chances than they create, which supports both-teams-to-score outcomes. In the last 5 matches both sides averaged 0.6 goals scored and conceded 2.8 (FH) and 3.2 (Thór) respectively, and Thór’s lack of clean sheets (0% CS) further increases BTTS likelihood. Therefore I recommend BTTS - Yes (70%) vs No (30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and form analysis indicate high goal potential: expected goals are 1.93 for FH and 1.57 for Thór, totaling 3.50 xG. The league averages 4.05 goals per match, and this season Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of FH matches and 80% of Thór matches; in the last 5 meetings both teams produced Over 2.5 in 80% of cases. Both sides concede heavily – FH and Thór have each conceded 27 goals this season, and in the last 5 matches they have conceded on average 2.8 and 3.2 goals respectively, which increases the likelihood of further goals. Offensive metrics corroborate this: FH averages 11.8 shots and has xG 1.29, Thór 10.4 shots and xG 1.16, while the visitors allow xG against of 2.56. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 2.5 – with an expected 3.50 goals the estimated probability of Over 2.5 is around 68%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Both teams concede many goals: FH averages 2.0 goals per match, while Thór concedes as many as 3.4 goals per match against a league average of 4.05 goals per fixture, indicating an open, high-scoring game. At half-time the statistics favor the home side — Thór were trailing at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), whereas FH were leading at half-time in 1 of 5 (20%), so a FH lead at 45 minutes is highly likely. However, the second half is particularly goal-rich: the average number of goals in the second half is 1.8 for FH matches and 2.4 for Thór matches, and the percentage of games with at least one goal after the break is 100% for the home team and 80% for the visitors, which supports potential turnarounds. Additionally, Thór concede an average of 2.56 xG against and on the season concede 3.4 goals, so their defense is vulnerable to goals after the break; FH have xG of 1.29 versus Thór’s 1.16, but both teams create and concede chances. As a result, the most likely scenario is a FH lead at half-time and a Thór win after 90 minutes (HT/FT 1/2), and I assign the highest probability to that scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FH | Thór | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FH is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - FH · 0.8 goals / game - Thór
FH scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 meczów).
Thór scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FH
Over / Under - Thór
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FH is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - FH · 0.6 pts / game - Thór
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FH - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Thór - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FH
Thór
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| FH | Liga | Thór | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 4.10 | 4.05 | ▼ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | • 70% | 71% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 73% | ▼ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 15% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 90% | 84% | ▼ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 89% | • 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of FH vs Thór?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 1:1 Thór. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FH vs Thór?
FH score 1.40 goals per game on average and Thór 0.80. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 70% of FH's matches and 50% of Thór's.
What form are FH and Thór in?
Over the last 5 games FH have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Thór 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs Thór?
The statistical background for FH vs Thór — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


