Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildKaplakrikavöllurData current as of September 02, 2026

FH vs Thór: match statistics

FH crest
FH
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Thór crest
Thór

FH vs Thór: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FH played against Thór in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on June 21, 2026. Venue: Kaplakrikavöllur. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

FH has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Thór has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

FH scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 2.70. Thór scores 0.80 and allows 2.70. Games in this league average 4.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 70% of FH's games and 50% of Thór's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 70%, compared with league averages of 71% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FH has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.23 per game. FH takes 12.5 shots per game, while Thór takes 11.1.

First-half and second-half trends

FH leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Thór leads at halftime in 10% and scores 0.60 after halftime.

When the teams score

FH's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Thór, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Úrvalsdeild games average 4.05 goals. Both teams score in 71% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FH has a clear advantage in chance creation and quality of scoring opportunities: at home they average 15 shots and 3.67 on target per match versus Thór’s 10.4 shots and 3.2 on target away, and their average xG is 1.78 compared to the visitors’ 1.16. This translates into greater offensive efficiency — the hosts score 1.33 goals per home match, while Thór scores 0.8 goals away, and the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches versus 33% for hosts. Both teams, however, have defensive issues: FH concedes 2.33 goals on average at home, and Thór concedes as many as 3.4 away; in the last 5 matches FH has conceded 14 goals and Thór 16, indicating a high number of shots on target and high-danger situations. Recent form favors the hosts — FH has 1 win and 3 goals scored in the last 5 matches with 0.6 points per match in that period, while Thór has not won any match and averages 0 points per match. Considering the higher xG (1.78 vs 1.16), more shots (15 vs 10.4) and superior goal conversion (1.33 vs 0.8), I forecast an FH victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The main indicators favor BTTS: league BTTS rate is 71% with an average of 4.05 goals per match, indicating a high scoring environment. FH has a season BTTS of 60% and averages 0.8 goals scored while conceding 2.0 per game; Thór has a BTTS of 40% and also scores 0.8 while conceding 3.4, so both teams are highly vulnerable to conceding. xG shows FH produces 1.29 and allows 1.98 xG, while Thór produces 1.16 and allows 2.56 xG — both sides concede more chances than they create, which supports both-teams-to-score outcomes. In the last 5 matches both sides averaged 0.6 goals scored and conceded 2.8 (FH) and 3.2 (Thór) respectively, and Thór’s lack of clean sheets (0% CS) further increases BTTS likelihood. Therefore I recommend BTTS - Yes (70%) vs No (30%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and form analysis indicate high goal potential: expected goals are 1.93 for FH and 1.57 for Thór, totaling 3.50 xG. The league averages 4.05 goals per match, and this season Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of FH matches and 80% of Thór matches; in the last 5 meetings both teams produced Over 2.5 in 80% of cases. Both sides concede heavily – FH and Thór have each conceded 27 goals this season, and in the last 5 matches they have conceded on average 2.8 and 3.2 goals respectively, which increases the likelihood of further goals. Offensive metrics corroborate this: FH averages 11.8 shots and has xG 1.29, Thór 10.4 shots and xG 1.16, while the visitors allow xG against of 2.56. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 2.5 – with an expected 3.50 goals the estimated probability of Over 2.5 is around 68%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Both teams concede many goals: FH averages 2.0 goals per match, while Thór concedes as many as 3.4 goals per match against a league average of 4.05 goals per fixture, indicating an open, high-scoring game. At half-time the statistics favor the home side — Thór were trailing at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), whereas FH were leading at half-time in 1 of 5 (20%), so a FH lead at 45 minutes is highly likely. However, the second half is particularly goal-rich: the average number of goals in the second half is 1.8 for FH matches and 2.4 for Thór matches, and the percentage of games with at least one goal after the break is 100% for the home team and 80% for the visitors, which supports potential turnarounds. Additionally, Thór concede an average of 2.56 xG against and on the season concede 3.4 goals, so their defense is vulnerable to goals after the break; FH have xG of 1.29 versus Thór’s 1.16, but both teams create and concede chances. As a result, the most likely scenario is a FH lead at half-time and a Thór win after 90 minutes (HT/FT 1/2), and I assign the highest probability to that scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

67Possession (%)33
FHThór
15Shots7
FHThór
6Shots on target1
FHThór
1.91xG0.84
FHThór
6Corners1
FHThór
76Dangerous attacks45
FHThór
15Fouls11
FHThór
1Cards3
FHThór

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.4Goals scored / game0.8
FHThór
2.7Goals allowed / game2.7
FHThór
40%Average possession42%
FHThór
4.2Shots on target / game3.4
FHThór

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.5Shots per game11.1
FHThór
4.2Shots on target3.4
FHThór
11.2%Shot conversion7.2%
FHThór
40%Possession42%
FHThór
1.52xG for1.23
FHThór
2.18xG against2.27
FHThór

Shooting quality

FH: BalancedThór: Balanced
FHThór
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FH
DLLLW
Season result split
10% W20% R70% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-7
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 at home
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 2.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Thór
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
20% W0% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-8
0.60 pts / game · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 2.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FH is 75% better for: goals scored per game.

1.4 goals / game - FH · 0.8 goals / game - Thór

FH scoring profile: very strong

FH scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 meczów).

Thór scoring profile: very strong

Thór scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 meczów).

14Goals scored (season)8
FHThór
27Goals conceded (season)27
FHThór
4.1Average goals per game3.5
FHThór
6Goals scored (last 5)3
FHThór
12Goals conceded (last 5)16
FHThór

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal60%
FHThór
50%2 goals20%
FHThór
20%3 goals0%
FHThór
0%4 goals0%
FHThór

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal90%
FHThór
70%2 goals60%
FHThór
60%3 goals50%
FHThór
30%4 goals40%
FHThór

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time10%
FHThór
10%BTTS in both halves0%
FHThór
10%Scored in both halves10%
FHThór

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FHThór
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
FHThór
60%BTTS - last 560%
FHThór

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
FHThór
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
FHThór
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
FHThór

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
FHThór
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
FHThór
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
FHThór

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FH is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / game - FH · 0.6 pts / game - Thór

FH - half-time state
30% leading20% draw50% trailing
Thór - half-time state
10% leading30% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)0.6
FHThór
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.2
FHThór
1.4Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
FHThór
2.3Average goals (1st half)1.4
FHThór
30%Clean sheet before half-time30%
FHThór
50%No goal before half-time80%
FHThór

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per game (2nd half)0.9
FHThór
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
FHThór
1.3Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
FHThór
1.8Average goals (2nd half)2.1
FHThór
30%Clean sheet after half-time30%
FHThór
70%No goal after half-time50%
FHThór

FH - second-half results

20% W20% R60% P
11
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding33%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Thór - second-half results

20% W30% R50% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.6
Average goals per game1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Thór - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game1.61.6
Average goals per game1.82.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-7-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FH
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Thór
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
0
6
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Thór

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

FHLigaThór
Average goals per game 4.104.05 3.50
Both teams scored 70%71% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%73% 70%
Clean sheets 0%15% 10%
Goal before half-time 90%84% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%89% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.05
Average goals per game
71%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
15%
Clean sheets
2.16
Home goals / game
1.89
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
15%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
42%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of FH vs Thór?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished FH 1:1 Thór. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FH vs Thór?

FH score 1.40 goals per game on average and Thór 0.80. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 70% of FH's matches and 50% of Thór's.

What form are FH and Thór in?

Over the last 5 games FH have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Thór 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FH vs Thór?

The statistical background for FH vs Thór — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.