Firpo vs CD Platense: match statistics
Firpo displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 61% of their matches at home with only 11% losses. The hosts have scored as many as 67 goals this season, conceding only 31, resulting in an impressive +16 goal difference at their home ground. CD Platense performs very poorly away from home with only 20% wins and 47% losses, conceding an average of 1.67 goals per match. The recent form from the last five matches also favors Firpo (2.2 points per match compared to 0.8 for the visitors). Additionally, the hosts have significantly better xG metrics (1.97 vs 1.08) and ball possession (54% vs 45%), which confirms their qualitative advantage. All key parameters point to a confident victory for Firpo in front of their home crowd.
Firpo vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Firpo played against CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on February 15, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Firpo has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. CD Platense has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Firpo scores 2.12 goals per game and allows 1.03. CD Platense scores 1.20 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Firpo's games and 57% of CD Platense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 47%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Firpo has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.22 per game. Firpo takes 11.4 shots per game, while CD Platense takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Firpo leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 1.39 goals per game after halftime. CD Platense leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Firpo's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (20 goals). For CD Platense, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Firpo displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 61% of their matches at home with only 11% losses. The hosts have scored as many as 67 goals this season, conceding only 31, resulting in an impressive +16 goal difference at their home ground. CD Platense performs very poorly away from home with only 20% wins and 47% losses, conceding an average of 1.67 goals per match. The recent form from the last five matches also favors Firpo (2.2 points per match compared to 0.8 for the visitors). Additionally, the hosts have significantly better xG metrics (1.97 vs 1.08) and ball possession (54% vs 45%), which confirms their qualitative advantage. All key parameters point to a confident victory for Firpo in front of their home crowd.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Firpo | CD Platense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Firpo is 175% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Firpo · 0.8 pts / game - CD Platense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Firpo is 77% better for: goals scored per game.
2.12 goals / game - Firpo · 1.2 goals / game - CD Platense
Firpo is 46% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.03 goals / game - Firpo · 1.5 goals / game - CD Platense
Firpo scores in 85% of games (28 of 33 meczów), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 meczów).
CD Platense scores in 63% of games (19 of 30 meczów), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Firpo
Over / Under - CD Platense
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Firpo is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / game - Firpo · 1.1 pts / game - CD Platense
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Firpo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
CD Platense - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (20 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Firpo
CD Platense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Firpo | Liga | CD Platense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.15 | 2.72 | • 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 56% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 53% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 27% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FirpoGoalNelson Vladimir Díaz Tobar
- CD PlatenseGoalJohan Carlos Bogotá Valencia
- FirpoGoalBrayan Balmore Landaverde Alvarez
Head-to-head
Record from Firpo's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against CD Platense. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Firpo vs CD Platense?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Firpo 3:1 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Firpo and CD Platense?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Firpo won 3, CD Platense won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Firpo vs CD Platense?
Firpo score 2.12 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.20. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Firpo's matches and 57% of CD Platense's.
What form are Firpo and CD Platense in?
Over the last 5 games Firpo have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and CD Platense 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Firpo vs CD Platense?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.