El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 22 July 2026

Firpo vs CD Platense: match statistics

Firpo crest
Firpo
3 : 1half-time 1:0
CD Platense crest
CD Platense
165%(1.53)
X22%(3.85)
213%(5.60)

Firpo displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 61% of their matches at home with only 11% losses. The hosts have scored as many as 67 goals this season, conceding only 31, resulting in an impressive +16 goal difference at their home ground. CD Platense performs very poorly away from home with only 20% wins and 47% losses, conceding an average of 1.67 goals per match. The recent form from the last five matches also favors Firpo (2.2 points per match compared to 0.8 for the visitors). Additionally, the hosts have significantly better xG metrics (1.97 vs 1.08) and ball possession (54% vs 45%), which confirms their qualitative advantage. All key parameters point to a confident victory for Firpo in front of their home crowd.

Firpo vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Firpo play CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 15 February 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Firpo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. CD Platense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Firpo scores 1.88 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. CD Platense scores 1.22 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Firpo 57%, CD Platense 57%. Over 2.5: Firpo 53%, CD Platense 41%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.24. Firpo: 11.2 shots per match, CD Platense: 8.5.

Match halves

Firpo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.24. CD Platense: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Firpo: 61-75 (26 goals). CD Platense: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 4-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 40%.

Match description

Firpo displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 61% of their matches at home with only 11% losses. The hosts have scored as many as 67 goals this season, conceding only 31, resulting in an impressive +16 goal difference at their home ground. CD Platense performs very poorly away from home with only 20% wins and 47% losses, conceding an average of 1.67 goals per match. The recent form from the last five matches also favors Firpo (2.2 points per match compared to 0.8 for the visitors). Additionally, the hosts have significantly better xG metrics (1.97 vs 1.08) and ball possession (54% vs 45%), which confirms their qualitative advantage. All key parameters point to a confident victory for Firpo in front of their home crowd.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
FirpoCD Platense
9Shots8
FirpoCD Platense
3Shots on target2
FirpoCD Platense
1.49xG1.26
FirpoCD Platense
1Corners5
FirpoCD Platense
96Dangerous attacks83
FirpoCD Platense
17Fouls7
FirpoCD Platense
0Cards0
FirpoCD Platense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.88Goals scored / match1.22
FirpoCD Platense
1.04Goals conceded / match1.43
FirpoCD Platense
52%Average possession48%
FirpoCD Platense
4.96Shots on target / match3.72
FirpoCD Platense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.24Shots per match8.48
FirpoCD Platense
4.96Shots on target3.72
FirpoCD Platense
16.8%Shot conversion14.4%
FirpoCD Platense
52%Possession48%
FirpoCD Platense
1.73xG for1.24
FirpoCD Platense
1.19xG against1.33
FirpoCD Platense

Shooting quality

Firpo: Efficient finishingCD Platense: Efficient finishing
FirpoCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)44%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Firpo · 1 pts / match - CD Platense

Firpo
DDDWL
Season result split
61% W24% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
31-12-8
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +43
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
15-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
CD Platense
LDWDL
Season result split
20% W41% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-19-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-8-10
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

1.88 goals / match - Firpo · 1.22 goals / match - CD Platense

Firpo is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.04 goals / match - Firpo · 1.43 goals / match - CD Platense

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 82% of matches (42 of 51 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 46 matches).

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 67% of matches (31 of 46 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (16 of 51 matches).

96Goals scored (season)56
FirpoCD Platense
53Goals conceded (season)66
FirpoCD Platense
2.92Average goals in match2.65
FirpoCD Platense
5Goals scored (last 5)4
FirpoCD Platense
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
FirpoCD Platense

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal67%
FirpoCD Platense
57%2 goals33%
FirpoCD Platense
39%3 goals17%
FirpoCD Platense
6%4 goals4%
FirpoCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal78%
FirpoCD Platense
25%2 goals35%
FirpoCD Platense
6%3 goals20%
FirpoCD Platense
2%4 goals7%
FirpoCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time17%
FirpoCD Platense
6%BTTS in both halves7%
FirpoCD Platense
39%Scored in both halves15%
FirpoCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
FirpoCD Platense
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
FirpoCD Platense
80%BTTS - last 540%
FirpoCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
FirpoCD Platense
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
FirpoCD Platense
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
FirpoCD Platense

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
FirpoCD Platense
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
FirpoCD Platense
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
FirpoCD Platense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Firpo · 1.13 pts / match - CD Platense

Firpo - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
22% leading48% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.13
FirpoCD Platense
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.52
FirpoCD Platense
0.49Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
FirpoCD Platense
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.11
FirpoCD Platense
65%Clean sheet before half-time52%
FirpoCD Platense
51%No goal before half-time63%
FirpoCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

2.12Points per match (2nd half)0.98
FirpoCD Platense
1.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
FirpoCD Platense
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
FirpoCD Platense
1.78Average goals (2nd half)1.54
FirpoCD Platense
55%Clean sheet after half-time46%
FirpoCD Platense
27%No goal after half-time54%
FirpoCD Platense

Firpo - second-half results

63% W24% R14% P
75
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
108
Second-half points
+35
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Platense - second-half results

17% W46% R37% P
52
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
12
8
0-15
9
9
16-30
12
8
31-45
13
12
46-60
26
9
61-75
24
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (26 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +17 - wins late phases.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
6
7
16-30
12
11
31-45
10
10
46-60
12
14
61-75
10
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FirpoLigaCD Platense
Average goals in match 2.922.67 2.65
Both teams scored 57%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%50% 41%
Clean sheets 31%27% 22%
Goal before half-time 67%68% 67%
Goal after half-time 86%78% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Firpo 4 - 1 - 0 CD Platense. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

CD Platense
0 : 1
Firpo
Firpo
6 : 2
CD Platense
CD Platense
0 : 2
Firpo
CD Platense
1 : 3
Firpo
Firpo
0 : 0
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of Firpo vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Firpo 3:1 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Firpo and CD Platense?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Firpo won 4, CD Platense won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Firpo vs CD Platense?

Firpo score 1.88 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.22. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Firpo's matches and 57% of CD Platense's.

What form are Firpo and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games Firpo have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and CD Platense 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Firpo vs CD Platense?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.