FK Bodo - Glimt vs Start: match statistics
FK Bodo - Glimt vs Start: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FK Bodo - Glimt played against Start in Eliteserien (Norway). The game was played on April 30, 2026. Final score: 5:0.
Recent form
FK Bodo - Glimt has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Start has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
FK Bodo - Glimt scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.20. Start scores 0.83 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.85 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 20% of FK Bodo - Glimt's games and 83% of Start's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 33%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FK Bodo - Glimt has the higher season xG average, 1.94 to 1.25 per game. FK Bodo - Glimt takes 13.8 shots per game, while Start takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
FK Bodo - Glimt leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Start leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
FK Bodo - Glimt's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Start, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eliteserien games average 2.85 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FK Bodo - Glimt is the clear favorite: at home they have a 100% win rate and 100% clean sheets, score an average of 3.0 goals per game with 22 shots and 9 on target on average, and produce 2.7 xG. Start has not won this season (0 wins) and away they have 0% wins and 75% losses, scoring an average of 0.75 goals with 2.5 shots on target and registering 25% of matches without a goal. The difference in quality of chances is significant: home xG for the hosts is 2.7 versus 1.04 xG for the visitors on the road, while the hosts concede only 0.86 xG at home compared to 1.63 xG conceded by Start away. In the last 5 matches Bodo have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (an average of 2.0 points per game), while Start have 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses (an average of 0.6 points per game). Considering the edge in shot volume, efficiency (14% vs 9%) and the visitors’ lack of away success, I expect a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season and league statistics strongly favor BTTS: the home side has BTTS at 100%, the away side 75%, and the league average is 53%. In the last 5 games Start posts BTTS in 100% (5/5), while Bodo has BTTS in only 40% (2/5), but Bodo has averaged 2.12 xG and scores 1.6 goals per game in the last 5, whereas Start has 1.35 xG and 1.0 goals per game. Defensively Start concedes on average 2.0 goals across the season and 1.6 in the last 5, while Bodo concedes 1.0 in the season and 1.4 in the last 5, increasing the probability of Start conceding. Additionally, Bodo averages 13.5 shots with 5.0 on target per match versus 8.75 and 2.5 for Start, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, which further supports the Goal/Goal scenario. Overall I assess BTTS at 80% vs 20% No Goal, therefore I recommend the BTTS - Yes pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining both teams' xG yields 1.66 expected goals for the home side (xG_for_home 1.68 vs xG_against_away 1.63) and 1.11 for Start (xG_for_away 1.04 vs xG_against_home 1.18), totaling 2.77 goals. A Poisson model at this total implies ~76% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~52% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~30% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Season and form data support the attacking case: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals this season, BTTS is 100% for the home side and 75% for Start, while Bodo averages 13.5 shots and 5.0 on target versus 8.75 and 2.5 for Start; additionally the home side’s last 5 matches xG is 2.12 versus Start’s 1.35. Consequently the strongest market is Over 1.5 (76% vs 24%), Over 2.5 is marginal (52% vs 48%), and Over 3.5 is not recommended (30% vs 70%), therefore recommendation: over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Bodo has a clear offensive advantage: xG 1.68 versus 1.04, on average 5.0 shots on target versus 2.5 for Start and 13.5 vs 8.75 total shots, which translates into more goal-scoring opportunities for the home side. At Half-Time I expect a rather even, low-scoring picture — the hosts score on average 0.5 goals by the break vs 0.25 for Start, and in the last five matches average goals by Half-Time are 1.4 (Bodo) vs 1.2 (Start), so a draw at the break is realistic. After the break the home advantage grows: in the last five games Bodo scores on average 1.2 goals in second halves, while Start concedes on average 1.25 goals in second halves; additionally the hosts have a 60% win rate in their last five matches versus 0% for Start and average 2.0 points per game compared to 0.6 for the visitors, all favoring a Bodo victory. BTTS data (100% for the hosts and 75% for Start) indicate both teams often score in matches, so I expect goals, but the second half will be decisive. On that basis the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1, ~40%). The second-strongest option is the hosts leading at the break and winning after Full-Time (1/1, ~20%), while a full-time draw and other turnarounds are assigned lower probabilities.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FK Bodo - Glimt | Start | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FK Bodo - Glimt is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - FK Bodo - Glimt · 0.6 pts / game - Start
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FK Bodo - Glimt is 117% better for: goals scored per game.
1.8 goals / game - FK Bodo - Glimt · 0.83 goals / game - Start
FK Bodo - Glimt is 39% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - FK Bodo - Glimt · 1.67 goals / game - Start
FK Bodo - Glimt scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Start keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).
Start scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while FK Bodo - Glimt keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FK Bodo - Glimt
Over / Under - Start
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FK Bodo - Glimt is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / game - FK Bodo - Glimt · 1 pts / game - Start
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FK Bodo - Glimt - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Start - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FK Bodo - Glimt
Start
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| FK Bodo - Glimt | Liga | Start | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.85 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 52% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 50% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 26% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 75% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of FK Bodo - Glimt vs Start?
The Eliteserien match finished FK Bodo - Glimt 5:0 Start. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FK Bodo - Glimt vs Start?
FK Bodo - Glimt score 1.80 goals per game on average and Start 0.83. The Eliteserien average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 20% of FK Bodo - Glimt's matches and 83% of Start's.
What form are FK Bodo - Glimt and Start in?
Over the last 5 games FK Bodo - Glimt have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Start 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FK Bodo - Glimt vs Start?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.