Bulgaria - Second LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

FK Minyor Pernik vs Dunav 2010: match statistics

FK Minyor Pernik crest
FK Minyor Pernik
1 : 2half-time 1:0
Dunav 2010 crest
Dunav 2010

FK Minyor Pernik vs Dunav 2010: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FK Minyor Pernik play Dunav 2010 in Second League (Bulgaria). The match date is 23 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

FK Minyor Pernik: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Dunav 2010: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FK Minyor Pernik scores 1.00 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Dunav 2010 scores 1.66 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FK Minyor Pernik 47%, Dunav 2010 31%. Over 2.5: FK Minyor Pernik 44%, Dunav 2010 38%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Dunav 2010 has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.27. FK Minyor Pernik: 9.7 shots per match, Dunav 2010: 11.0.

Match halves

FK Minyor Pernik: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.44. Dunav 2010: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

FK Minyor Pernik: 16-30 (7 goals). Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Dunav 2010 holds a clear advantage in the table and results — they sit 1st (19-9-3) with 51 goals scored, while FK Minyor Pernik are 15th (7-9-15) with 31 goals. The visitors’ defense is noticeably stronger: Dunav have conceded only 15 goals this season (0.73 on the road), versus Minyor’s 43 and 1.2 per home match; in the last 5 games the hosts have conceded 10 goals (2.0 per match) compared to Dunav’s 6 conceded (1.2 per match). In terms of chance creation Minyor average xG 1.48 at home and 11.27 shots per game (5.47 on target), but they only convert ~9% of shots and fail to score in 47% of home matches; Dunav away have xG 1.36 with 9.93 shots (5.2 on target) and a higher conversion of ~15%, yielding 1.53 goals per match. Additionally the visitors keep clean sheets more often (47% of away games vs 27% home clean sheets for Minyor) and have a 53% away win rate versus the hosts’ 20% home win rate, therefore I forecast a Dunav win and estimate probabilities: away ~60%, draw ~25%, home ~15%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
7Shots13
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
1Shots on target8
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
0xG0
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
-1Corners-1
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
0Dangerous attacks0
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
-1Fouls-1
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
-1Cards-1
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
1Goals scored / match1.66
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
1.41Goals conceded / match0.5
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
48%Average possession50%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
5.19Shots on target / match6.13
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.69Shots per match11.03
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
5.19Shots on target6.13
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
10.3%Shot conversion15%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
48%Possession50%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
1.27xG for1.44
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
1.54xG against1.02
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

Shooting quality

FK Minyor Pernik: BalancedDunav 2010: Efficient finishing
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
Accuracy (shots on target)54%56%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dunav 2010 is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - FK Minyor Pernik · 1.4 pts / match - Dunav 2010

FK Minyor Pernik
WLLLL
Season result split
22% W28% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-16
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-6-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Dunav 2010
LWDLW
Season result split
63% W28% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-3
2.16 pts / match · goal difference +37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dunav 2010 is 66% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - FK Minyor Pernik · 1.66 goals / match - Dunav 2010

Dunav 2010 is 182% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.41 goals / match - FK Minyor Pernik · 0.5 goals / match - Dunav 2010

FK Minyor Pernik scoring profile: more difficult

FK Minyor Pernik scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 63% (20 of 32 matches).

Dunav 2010 scoring profile: very strong

Dunav 2010 scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while FK Minyor Pernik keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

32Goals scored (season)53
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
45Goals conceded (season)16
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
2.41Average goals in match2.16
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
5Goals scored (last 5)8
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal78%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
25%2 goals63%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
16%3 goals19%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
3%4 goals6%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal38%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
41%2 goals9%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
19%3 goals3%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
3%4 goals0%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
FK Minyor Pernik - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 32 matches
46%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time6%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
6%BTTS in both halves0%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
19%Scored in both halves41%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
40%BTTS - last 560%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dunav 2010 is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - FK Minyor Pernik · 1.97 pts / match - Dunav 2010

FK Minyor Pernik - half-time state
31% leading34% draw34% trailing
Dunav 2010 - half-time state
53% leading38% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.97
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.78
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.16
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
1.09Average goals (1st half)0.94
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
59%Clean sheet before half-time84%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
59%No goal before half-time44%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.91
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.34
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.22
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
38%Clean sheet after half-time75%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010
66%No goal after half-time38%
FK Minyor PernikDunav 2010

FK Minyor Pernik - second-half results

22% W31% R47% P
41
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding71%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 22%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dunav 2010 - second-half results

53% W31% R16% P
63
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FK Minyor Pernik - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Dunav 2010 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FK Minyor Pernik
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
7
5
16-30
5
8
31-45
6
6
46-60
3
13
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Dunav 2010
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
8
1
16-30
7
1
31-45
7
1
46-60
8
2
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FK Minyor Pernik

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Dunav 2010

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

FK Minyor PernikLigaDunav 2010
Average goals in match 2.412.52 2.16
Both teams scored 47%46% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%46% 38%
Clean sheets 22%32% 63%
Goal before half-time 69%70% 66%
Goal after half-time 78%73% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FK Minyor Pernik 0 - 0 - 1 Dunav 2010. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FK Minyor Pernik vs Dunav 2010?

The Second League match finished FK Minyor Pernik 1:2 Dunav 2010. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FK Minyor Pernik vs Dunav 2010?

FK Minyor Pernik score 1.00 goals per game on average and Dunav 2010 1.66. The Second League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 47% of FK Minyor Pernik's matches and 31% of Dunav 2010's.

What form are FK Minyor Pernik and Dunav 2010 in?

Over the last 5 games FK Minyor Pernik have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Dunav 2010 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FK Minyor Pernik vs Dunav 2010?

The statistical background for FK Minyor Pernik vs Dunav 2010 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.