England - EFL League TwoHighbury StadiumData current as of October 16, 2026

Fleetwood Town vs Oldham Athletic: match statistics

Fleetwood Town vs Oldham Athletic: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Fleetwood Town played against Oldham Athletic in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on September 1, 2026. Venue: Highbury Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Fleetwood Town has 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.67 points per game. Oldham Athletic has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Fleetwood Town scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.67. Oldham Athletic scores 2.00 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.50 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Fleetwood Town's games and 33% of Oldham Athletic's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 67%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Oldham Athletic has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.49 per game. Fleetwood Town takes 14.0 shots per game, while Oldham Athletic takes 14.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Fleetwood Town leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Oldham Athletic leads at halftime in 67% and scores 1.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Fleetwood Town's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Oldham Athletic, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League Two games average 2.50 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fleetwood Town remain unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws with a 7:1 goal difference, while Oldham Athletic have lost 3 of their last 5 games and conceded 7 goals in that run. At home, Fleetwood dominate possession, averaging 63% compared with Oldham’s 35%, and also register 17 shots per match against just 6 from their opponents. The quality of chances also clearly favors Fleetwood: their average xG stands at 1.61, while Oldham produce only 0.74 xG away from home and allow opponents 1.94 xG. Fleetwood kept a clean sheet in their only home match so far, whereas Oldham conceded 2 goals and lost their away fixture. The main risk for the hosts is their home draw to date and their failure to score in that single appearance, but the advantage in form and chance creation points to a Fleetwood victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS points away from Fleetwood’s defense, which has conceded just 0.2 goals per game across its last 5 matches and has kept a clean sheet in 100% of its home games so far. Although Oldham averages 1.6 goals in its last five appearances, its average xG is only 1.10, while away from home it records just 2 shots on target and 6 attempts per match. Fleetwood should have a clear chance to score, as Oldham concedes an average of 2.0 goals away from home, with an xG against of 1.94. At the same time, BTTS has landed in only 20% of the hosts’ last five matches, while the combined league rate of both teams scoring stands at 46%. The more likely scenario is therefore BTTS - No, meaning that at least one side—Oldham in particular—will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Fleetwood have averaged 1.4 goals scored and conceded just 0.2 over their last five matches, while Oldham have scored 1.6 goals but conceded 1.4 per game. The hosts should be able to exploit their opponents’ defensive weakness, as Oldham allow an average of 1.67 xG, while Fleetwood create chances worth an average of 1.18 xG. The away side have lower attacking potential on the road, with 0.74 xG and an average of 6 shots, so the projected scoreline of 1.50:0.80 supports a two-goal outcome more than a four-goal game. Over 1.5 is the stronger option, as both teams have cleared this line in 100% of their matches so far this season, while Fleetwood’s recent results reduce confidence in Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Fleetwood win, as the hosts have remained unbeaten in their last five matches, averaging 2.2 points per game, while Oldham have lost 60% of their fixtures. Fleetwood conceded just 0.2 goals per match during this period, whereas Oldham allowed opponents to score 1.4, which clearly strengthens the case for a home win at full-time. The opening stages may nevertheless be evenly matched: both teams were level at the break in 40% of their last five matches, and each conceded just 0.2 goals per game before half-time. After the interval, Fleetwood’s advantage should grow, as Oldham have conceded an average of 1.2 goals in the second half across their last five matches, with their opponents scoring at least two goals in 100% of those games. In addition, the hosts average 11 shots compared with Oldham’s six and have the higher xG, 1.10 versus the visitors’ 0.74, supporting a turnaround and a decisive break from the deadlock in the closing stages.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
16Shots11
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
3Shots on target3
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
1.59xG1.24
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
7Corners4
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
51Dangerous attacks44
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
8Fouls2
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
1Cards0
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
1Goals scored / game2
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0.67Goals allowed / game0.67
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
46%Average possession40%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
3.67Shots on target / game4.67
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14Shots per game14.33
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
3.67Shots on target4.67
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
7.1%Shot conversion14%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
46%Possession40%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
1.49xG for1.55
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
1.46xG against1.24
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

Shooting quality

Fleetwood Town: AttackingOldham Athletic: Counter-attacking
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
Accuracy (shots on target)26%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Oldham Athletic is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.67 pts / game - Fleetwood Town · 2 pts / game - Oldham Athletic

Fleetwood Town
WDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
33% W67% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
Oldham Athletic
WLW
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Oldham Athletic is 100% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Fleetwood Town · 2 goals / game - Oldham Athletic

Fleetwood Town scoring profile: mixed

Fleetwood Town scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Oldham Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).

Oldham Athletic scoring profile: strong

Oldham Athletic scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Fleetwood Town keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).

3Goals scored (season)6
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
2Goals conceded (season)2
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
1.67Average goals per game2.67
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
33%2 goals67%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0%3 goals33%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0%4 goals0%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal33%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
33%2 goals33%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0%3 goals0%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0%4 goals0%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
33%BTTS in both halves0%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
33%Scored in both halves33%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
33%BTTS - last 533%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Oldham Athletic is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Fleetwood Town · 2.33 pts / game - Oldham Athletic

Fleetwood Town - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Oldham Athletic - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)2.33
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
1Average goals (1st half)0.67
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
67%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
33%No goal before half-time33%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)2
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
0.67Average goals (2nd half)2
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic
67%No goal after half-time33%
Fleetwood TownOldham Athletic

Fleetwood Town - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Oldham Athletic - second-half results

67% W0% D33% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Fleetwood Town - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.671.00
Goals scored / game0.70.3
Goals allowed / game0.30.3
Average goals per game1.00.7
1 goal67%33%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2
Oldham Athletic - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.332.00
Goals scored / game0.71.3
Goals allowed / game0.00.7
Average goals per game0.72.0
1 goal67%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Fleetwood Town
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Oldham Athletic
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Fleetwood Town

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Oldham Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
194%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Fleetwood TownLigaOldham Athletic
Average goals per game▼ 1.672.50▲ 2.67
Both teams scored▼ 33%50%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%50%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▲ 67%31%▲ 67%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%72%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 33%69%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / game
1.03
Away goals / game
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Fleetwood TownYellow cardHarrison Neal
  2. Oldham AthleticGoalKane DrummondAssist: Calum Kavanagh
  3. Oldham AthleticSubstitutionOn: Karl Mike Fondop-TalumOff: Elliot Nevitt
  4. Oldham AthleticSubstitutionOn: Ryan WoodsOff: Calum Kavanagh
  5. Fleetwood TownGoalRonan Liam CoughlinAssist: Shaun Rooney

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Fleetwood Town's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Oldham Athletic. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Oldham Athletic AFC
1 : 1
Fleetwood Town FC
Fleetwood Town FC
1 : 1
Oldham Athletic AFC

FAQ

What was the result of Fleetwood Town vs Oldham Athletic?

The EFL League Two match finished Fleetwood Town 1:1 Oldham Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Fleetwood Town and Oldham Athletic?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Fleetwood Town won 0, Oldham Athletic won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Fleetwood Town vs Oldham Athletic?

Fleetwood Town score 1.00 goals per game on average and Oldham Athletic 2.00. The EFL League Two average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Fleetwood Town's matches and 33% of Oldham Athletic's.

What form are Fleetwood Town and Oldham Athletic in?

Over the last 5 games Fleetwood Town have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Oldham Athletic 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fleetwood Town vs Oldham Athletic?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.