Fluminense vs Chapecoense: match statistics
Fluminense vs Chapecoense: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Fluminense played against Chapecoense in Serie A (Brazil). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Fluminense has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Chapecoense has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Fluminense scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.25. Chapecoense scores 1.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Fluminense's games and 55% of Chapecoense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 36%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fluminense has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.25 per game. Fluminense takes 15.2 shots per game, while Chapecoense takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Fluminense leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Chapecoense leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.64 after halftime.
When the teams score
Fluminense's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Chapecoense, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie A games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fluminense are clear favorites, especially at home — in home matches they average 1.83 goals, register 6.83 shots on target and 59% possession, with an 83% home win rate. Chapecoense are very poor away: only 0.25 goals per game on average, just 0.75 shots on target and failed to score in 75% of away fixtures. The quality gap is confirmed by xG: Fluminense at home have 1.83 xG versus 0.76 xG for the visitors away, and shot conversion is 11% vs 3%, suggesting the hosts create and convert chances about twice as often. Chapecoense’s defense is vulnerable — they concede 1.75 goals away on average and have shipped 12 goals in the last 5 matches, while Fluminense concede 1.00 at home on average, giving the hosts a defensive edge. Considering recent points form as well (Fluminense 1.00 point average in the last 5 matches vs Chapecoense 0.20), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Signals are mixed: Fluminense at home has a high BTTS 71% and concedes on average 2.14 goals per game with only 14% clean sheets, meaning opponents score against them in about 86% of matches. However, Chapecoense away scores only 0.25 goals on average, has 0.75 shots on target and a 3% conversion rate, and their seasonal away BTTS is only 25%, which strongly argues for No Goal from the visitors. In the last 5 matches Chapecoense scored 2 goals (0.4 per game) despite an average recent xG of 1.31 per game, indicating very poor finishing. Considering the 86% chance Fluminense will concede and a realistic 20–35% chance Chapecoense will score in this match, I estimate BTTS (Yes) at about 40% and No BTTS at 60%, therefore I recommend the No selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals were calculated as the average of the team’s attacking xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: Fluminense (attacking xG 1.53 vs opponent defensive xG 2.17) yields 1.85, Chapecoense (0.76 vs 1.74) yields 1.25, total 3.10 xG. Seasonal statistics strongly indicate Over 1.5 goals: Fluminense has 86% of matches over 1.5, Chapecoense 100%, hence an Over 1.5 estimate of ~92%. Signals for the 2.5 line are moderate: Fluminense has 57% seasonal Over 2.5 and 60% in the last 5, Chapecoense 0% for the season but 40% in the last 5; given xG_total=3.10 and the league average goals of 2.62 I rate Over 2.5 at 66%. The 3.5 line is less likely since the expected 3.10 is below 3.5; although Fluminense has 57% of matches over 3.5 this season and Chapecoense 0%, I estimate Over 3.5 at 35%. The best line to back is Over 1.5, because both teams combined show 86% and 100% of matches over 1.5, and Fluminense’s advantage in shots on target (4.29 vs 0.75) and conversion rate (9% vs 3%) supports earlier scoring.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1), because both teams frequently reach a draw at the break: Fluminense were level at Half-Time in 71% of matches and Chapecoense in 75%. Fluminense have a clear advantage in the second half — average xG of 1.53 for the home side versus 0.76 for the visitors, and second-half goals per match of 0.86 for Fluminense compared to 0.25 for Chapecoense, indicating a higher probability of a home goal after the break. Additionally, the hosts average 4.29 shots on target versus 0.75 for the visitors and have a higher conversion rate (9% vs 3%), so given a draw at the break Fluminense are the favorites to score the decisive goal. Chapecoense effectively do not win (0% season wins and 0% in the last 5 matches) and score on average 0.0 goals by Half-Time and 0.25 goals per match, which limits their chances of a turnaround. Still, Fluminense were trailing at Half-Time in 29% of matches (29% trailingAtHT_home), so the scenario of the hosts coming back from a trailing position (2/1) is also possible and has been accounted for in the probability distribution.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Fluminense | Chapecoense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fluminense is 900% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Fluminense · 0.2 pts / game - Chapecoense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fluminense is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - Fluminense · 1 goals / game - Chapecoense
Fluminense is 60% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Fluminense · 2 goals / game - Chapecoense
Fluminense scores in 100% of games (12 of 12 meczów), while Chapecoense keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 meczów).
Chapecoense scores in 55% of games (6 of 11 meczów), while Fluminense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fluminense
Over / Under - Chapecoense
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fluminense is 151% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.83 pts / game - Fluminense · 0.73 pts / game - Chapecoense
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fluminense - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chapecoense - second-half results
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Fluminense
Chapecoense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Fluminense | Liga | Chapecoense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.59 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 55% | • 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 47% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 25% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | • 75% | 74% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Fluminense vs Chapecoense?
The Serie A match finished Fluminense 2:1 Chapecoense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fluminense vs Chapecoense?
Fluminense score 1.75 goals per game on average and Chapecoense 1.00. The Serie A average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Fluminense's matches and 55% of Chapecoense's.
What form are Fluminense and Chapecoense in?
Over the last 5 games Fluminense have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Chapecoense 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fluminense vs Chapecoense?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


