Brazil - Serie AEstadio Jornalista Mário FilhoData current as of August 31, 2026

Fluminense vs Remo: match statistics

Fluminense crest
Fluminense
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Remo crest
Remo

Fluminense vs Remo: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Fluminense played against Remo in Serie A (Brazil). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: Estadio Jornalista Mário Filho. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Fluminense has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Remo has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Fluminense scores 1.48 goals per game and allows 1.22. Remo scores 1.17 and allows 1.61. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 74% of Fluminense's games and 57% of Remo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 48%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Fluminense has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.28 per game. Fluminense takes 15.3 shots per game, while Remo takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Fluminense leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Remo leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.61 after halftime.

When the teams score

Fluminense's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Remo, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie A games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fluminense are exceptionally strong at home: they win 67% of their home matches, score an average of 1.75 goals, and create chances worth 2.02 xG per game. Remo lose as many as 58% of their away matches, concede an average of 2 goals, and have an away goal difference of -12. The hosts average 17.92 shots and 6.83 shots on target per match, compared with 11.58 and 3.17 respectively for the visitors, pointing to a clear Fluminense advantage in chance creation. In addition, Remo fail to score in 50% of their away matches, while Fluminense score in 92% of their home games. Both teams have recently been drawing regularly, but Remo’s weaker form, with no win in their last five matches, further strengthens the case for backing the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is moderately positive: Fluminense recorded BTTS in 64% of matches, while both teams found the net in 60% of their last five games. Remo should have good conditions to score, as Fluminense kept a clean sheet in only 18% of matches and has conceded an average of 1.53 xG. The hosts are clear candidates to score against a Remo defense that concedes an average of 2.00 goals per match and kept a clean sheet in just 8% of games. Additionally, Fluminense creates an average of 1.35 xG and records 4.64 shots on target per match, while Remo allows opponents 1.58 xG. The risk to the pick is Remo’s weaker finishing, with the team scoring only 0.8 goals per match across its last five league games; however, the vulnerability of both defenses slightly favors BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Fluminense average 1.36 goals per match, while Remo concede as many as 2.00, giving the hosts a realistic chance of scoring around 1.45 goals. The visitors are less effective, however: they average 1.00 goal scored, and only 0.80 over their last five matches, which puts their projection at 0.90 goals. Over their last five matches, both teams combined averaged 1.8 goals per game, with Fluminense recording a 5:6 and Remo a 4:6 goals-for-and-against record. The 3.5 line was not exceeded in 73% of Fluminense matches and 75% of Remo matches, while neither side shows a high level of consistency in scoring at least two goals. Under 3.5 is therefore best supported by the projected total of 2.35 goals and the recurring scoreline profile of both teams.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A Half-Time/Full-Time draw/home win (X/1) is the most likely outcome, as Fluminense were level at the break in 55% of their matches, compared with 50% for Remo; over their last five games, both teams recorded a 60% rate of first-half draws. A cautious opening is also expected based on their current scoring form: Fluminense have averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time in their last five matches, while Remo have averaged 0.4. After the break, the advantage should shift to the hosts, who average 0.64 goals scored and 0.45 conceded, whereas Remo concede as many as 0.92 goals after half-time in away matches. Fluminense also have a higher average points return over the season, 1.27 compared with 0.75, while Remo have lost 58% of their matches and kept a clean sheet in just 8% of them, supporting the HT/FT draw/home win scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

73Possession (%)27
FluminenseRemo
19Shots7
FluminenseRemo
8Shots on target1
FluminenseRemo
2.32xG0.65
FluminenseRemo
11Corners2
FluminenseRemo
79Dangerous attacks18
FluminenseRemo
10Fouls10
FluminenseRemo
1Cards1
FluminenseRemo

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.48Goals scored / game1.17
FluminenseRemo
1.22Goals allowed / game1.61
FluminenseRemo
59%Average possession43%
FluminenseRemo
5.7Shots on target / game3.87
FluminenseRemo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.3Shots per game11.91
FluminenseRemo
5.7Shots on target3.87
FluminenseRemo
9.7%Shot conversion9.9%
FluminenseRemo
59%Possession43%
FluminenseRemo
1.73xG for1.28
FluminenseRemo
1.4xG against1.55
FluminenseRemo

Shooting quality

Fluminense: DominantRemo: Balanced
FluminenseRemo
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Fluminense is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Fluminense · 1 pts / game - Remo

Fluminense
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
43% W35% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-5
1.65 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-1
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Remo
LWLDD
Season result split
22% W35% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-10
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fluminense is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.48 goals / game - Fluminense · 1.17 goals / game - Remo

Fluminense is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.22 goals / game - Fluminense · 1.61 goals / game - Remo

Fluminense scoring profile: very strong

Fluminense scores in 87% of games (20 of 23 meczów), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 meczów).

Remo scoring profile: very strong

Remo scores in 65% of games (15 of 23 meczów), while Fluminense keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).

34Goals scored (season)27
FluminenseRemo
28Goals conceded (season)37
FluminenseRemo
2.7Average goals per game2.78
FluminenseRemo
6Goals scored (last 5)6
FluminenseRemo
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
FluminenseRemo

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal65%
FluminenseRemo
43%2 goals35%
FluminenseRemo
17%3 goals13%
FluminenseRemo
0%4 goals4%
FluminenseRemo

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal87%
FluminenseRemo
35%2 goals52%
FluminenseRemo
4%3 goals17%
FluminenseRemo
0%4 goals4%
FluminenseRemo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time39%
FluminenseRemo
13%BTTS in both halves9%
FluminenseRemo
30%Scored in both halves22%
FluminenseRemo

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
FluminenseRemo
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
FluminenseRemo
80%BTTS - last 560%
FluminenseRemo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
FluminenseRemo
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
FluminenseRemo
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
FluminenseRemo

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
FluminenseRemo
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
FluminenseRemo
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
FluminenseRemo

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fluminense is 95% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / game - Fluminense · 0.78 pts / game - Remo

Fluminense - half-time state
39% leading35% draw26% trailing
Remo - half-time state
9% leading52% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per game (1st half)0.78
FluminenseRemo
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.57
FluminenseRemo
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.91
FluminenseRemo
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.48
FluminenseRemo
61%Clean sheet before half-time26%
FluminenseRemo
48%No goal before half-time52%
FluminenseRemo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per game (2nd half)1.26
FluminenseRemo
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
FluminenseRemo
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
FluminenseRemo
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.3
FluminenseRemo
35%Clean sheet after half-time52%
FluminenseRemo
35%No goal after half-time61%
FluminenseRemo

Fluminense - second-half results

35% W39% R26% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Remo - second-half results

30% W35% R35% P
18
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding244%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Fluminense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.602.20
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Remo - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.00
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game1.40.2
Average goals per game2.00.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-4+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Fluminense
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
6
1
16-30
7
3
31-45
7
4
46-60
2
6
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Remo
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
9
16-30
6
9
31-45
4
9
46-60
2
2
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.74
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Fluminense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Remo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

FluminenseLigaRemo
Average goals per game 2.702.60 2.78
Both teams scored 74%58% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 48%
Clean sheets 17%24% 13%
Goal before half-time 74%76% 83%
Goal after half-time 83%77% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Fluminense's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Remo. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Fluminense vs Remo?

The Serie A match finished Fluminense 2:1 Remo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fluminense vs Remo?

Fluminense score 1.48 goals per game on average and Remo 1.17. The Serie A average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Fluminense's matches and 57% of Remo's.

What form are Fluminense and Remo in?

Over the last 5 games Fluminense have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Remo 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fluminense vs Remo?

The statistical background for Fluminense vs Remo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.