Forest Green Rovers vs Hartlepool United: match statistics
Forest Green Rovers vs Hartlepool United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Forest Green Rovers played against Hartlepool United in National League (England). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: The New Lawn. Final score: 2:4.
Recent form
Forest Green Rovers has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Hartlepool United has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Forest Green Rovers scores 1.55 goals per game and allows 1.64. Hartlepool United scores 0.67 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 3.08 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Forest Green Rovers's games and 33% of Hartlepool United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 33%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Forest Green Rovers has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.24 per game. Forest Green Rovers takes 12.7 shots per game, while Hartlepool United takes 8.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Forest Green Rovers leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Hartlepool United leads at halftime in 8% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Forest Green Rovers's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Hartlepool United, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
National League games average 3.08 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Forest Green Rovers have a clear advantage in current form: they have collected 6 points from their last 5 matches, while Hartlepool United have lost all 5, scoring just 3 goals and conceding 11. At home, the hosts average 1.67 goals per match, while the visitors manage just 0.67 away from home; Hartlepool have also lost 83% of their away matches. Forest Green pose a greater threat in front of goal, averaging 5.67 shots on target at home compared with Hartlepool’s 3.17 away, while their xG stands at 1.83 versus the visitors’ 1.18. However, the hosts concede 1.83 goals per home match, so despite their advantage, a win is not guaranteed.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The biggest obstacle to BTTS - Yes is Hartlepool’s lack of finishing: the visitors average 0.67 goals in the away matches analyzed and just 0.6 goals across their last five games. Forest Green kept a clean sheet in 33% of the home matches analyzed, making a Hartlepool blank a realistic scenario. On the other hand, the hosts have averaged 2.0 goals recently, while Hartlepool have conceded 2.2, which clearly boosts the chances of Forest Green scoring. Recent results also support BTTS - Yes, with both teams scoring in 80% and 60% of their respective last five matches. However, the visitors’ low scoring rate outweighs this evidence. Therefore, it is marginally more likely that at least one team will fail to score (BTTS - No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has stayed under in 83% of Forest Green’s home matches and Hartlepool’s away matches. The hosts score an average of 0.67 goals at home, while the visitors average the same away from home, although Hartlepool concede as many as 1.83 goals per game on the road. The last five matches point to greater goal-scoring potential—Forest Green averaged 2.0 goals scored, while Hartlepool conceded 2.2—so I am not expecting an extremely low-scoring result. At the same time, xG of 1.31 for the hosts and 1.18 for the visitors, combined with their modest scoring averages, points more towards 2–3 goals than at least four.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Forest Green Rovers leading at the break and holding that lead through to full time, although a half-time draw remains a realistic alternative. In their last five matches, the hosts led at half-time in 40% of games, while Hartlepool did not lead at the break once and went in trailing in 60%. Forest Green have recently averaged 2.0 goals per match, whereas Hartlepool have lost five consecutive games, conceding an average of 2.2 goals in those matches. The visitors’ poor second-half performances also favor Forest Green holding any potential lead: over their last five matches, Hartlepool averaged just 0.2 goals after the break, compared with 1.0 for the hosts. Caution is warranted, however, as Forest Green drew at half-time in 50% of matches over the full period analyzed, so the HT/FT outcome of a half-time draw followed by a home win also carries a high probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Forest Green Rovers | Hartlepool United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forest Green Rovers is 131% better for: goals scored per game.
1.55 goals / game - Forest Green Rovers · 0.67 goals / game - Hartlepool United
Hartlepool United is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.64 goals / game - Forest Green Rovers · 1.42 goals / game - Hartlepool United
Forest Green Rovers scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 games), while Hartlepool United keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 games).
Hartlepool United scores in 58% of games (7 of 12 games), while Forest Green Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Forest Green Rovers
Over / Under - Hartlepool United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forest Green Rovers is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / game - Forest Green Rovers · 0.75 pts / game - Hartlepool United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Forest Green Rovers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Hartlepool United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Forest Green Rovers
Hartlepool United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Forest Green Rovers | Liga | Hartlepool United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.18 | 3.08 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 62% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | • 18% | 19% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 73% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 87% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Forest Green Rovers's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Hartlepool United. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Forest Green Rovers vs Hartlepool United?
The National League match finished Forest Green Rovers 2:4 Hartlepool United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Forest Green Rovers and Hartlepool United?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Forest Green Rovers won 1, Hartlepool United won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Forest Green Rovers vs Hartlepool United?
Forest Green Rovers score 1.55 goals per game on average and Hartlepool United 0.67. The National League average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Forest Green Rovers's matches and 33% of Hartlepool United's.
What form are Forest Green Rovers and Hartlepool United in?
Over the last 5 games Forest Green Rovers have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Hartlepool United 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forest Green Rovers vs Hartlepool United?
The statistical background for Forest Green Rovers vs Hartlepool United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


