Forest Green Rovers vs Woking: match statistics
Forest Green Rovers display solid home disposition with 60% wins and an impressive goal difference of 14 goals in home matches. The hosts dominate in terms of xG (2.35 vs 1.01), possession (56%), and average shots on target (7.2), indicating an offensive advantage. Woking, despite good form in the last five matches (1.8 PPG), has weaker away statistics - only 46% wins and issues with efficiency (31% FTS%). The recent form of the hosts causes some concern (1 PPG in the last 5 matches), however, the statistical advantage in home matches and higher table position speak in their favor. The difference in quality of play at their own stadium and higher expected goals should translate into a victory for Forest Green Rovers, though Woking may put up resistance.
Forest Green Rovers vs Woking: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Forest Green Rovers played against Woking in National League (England). The game was played on February 3, 2026. Final score: 4:2.
Recent form
Forest Green Rovers has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Woking has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Forest Green Rovers scores 1.66 goals per game and allows 1.00. Woking scores 1.33 and allows 1.07. Games in this league average 2.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 66% of Forest Green Rovers's games and 48% of Woking's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 41%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Forest Green Rovers has the higher season xG average, 2.05 to 1.31 per game. Forest Green Rovers takes 17.0 shots per game, while Woking takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Forest Green Rovers leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Woking leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
Forest Green Rovers's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (11 goals). For Woking, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
National League games average 2.82 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Forest Green Rovers display solid home disposition with 60% wins and an impressive goal difference of 14 goals in home matches. The hosts dominate in terms of xG (2.35 vs 1.01), possession (56%), and average shots on target (7.2), indicating an offensive advantage. Woking, despite good form in the last five matches (1.8 PPG), has weaker away statistics - only 46% wins and issues with efficiency (31% FTS%). The recent form of the hosts causes some concern (1 PPG in the last 5 matches), however, the statistical advantage in home matches and higher table position speak in their favor. The difference in quality of play at their own stadium and higher expected goals should translate into a victory for Forest Green Rovers, though Woking may put up resistance.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Forest Green Rovers | Woking | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Forest Green Rovers is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Forest Green Rovers · 0.8 pts / game - Woking
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forest Green Rovers is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1.66 goals / game - Forest Green Rovers · 1.33 goals / game - Woking
Forest Green Rovers is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Forest Green Rovers · 1.07 goals / game - Woking
Forest Green Rovers scores in 86% of games (25 of 29 meczów), while Woking keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 meczów).
Woking scores in 70% of games (19 of 27 meczów), while Forest Green Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Forest Green Rovers
Over / Under - Woking
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Forest Green Rovers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Woking - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Forest Green Rovers
Woking
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Forest Green Rovers | Liga | Woking | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.66 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 66% | 55% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 54% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 25% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 80% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Forest Green Rovers's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Woking. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Forest Green Rovers vs Woking?
The National League match finished Forest Green Rovers 4:2 Woking. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Forest Green Rovers vs Woking?
Forest Green Rovers score 1.66 goals per game on average and Woking 1.33. The National League average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 66% of Forest Green Rovers's matches and 48% of Woking's.
What form are Forest Green Rovers and Woking in?
Over the last 5 games Forest Green Rovers have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Woking 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forest Green Rovers vs Woking?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Forest Green Rovers vs Woking: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.