Scotland - League TwoData current as of September 11, 2026

Forfar Athletic vs Clyde: match statistics

Forfar Athletic crest
Forfar Athletic
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Clyde crest
Clyde
135%(2.88)
X35%(3.30)
230%(2.40)

Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams. Forfar Athletic presents solid home form with 46% of home matches won and a goal difference of +3, yet their recent form (1.4 pts/game) raises some doubts. Clyde, on the other hand, is the master of away draws (58% of matches end in a split of points) and possesses an impressive goal difference of +13 in away games, making them a tough opponent. The visiting team has a better average of goals scored away (1.92) than the hosts do at home (1.62), as well as a better defense (0.83 vs 1.38 goals conceded). Considering Clyde's tendency to draw and the solid form of both teams, a share of the points is the most probable scenario, though Forfar's slight home advantage and recent victories at their own stadium give them a chance for a win.

Forfar Athletic vs Clyde: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Forfar Athletic played against Clyde in League Two (Scotland). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Forfar Athletic has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Clyde has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Forfar Athletic scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 1.48. Clyde scores 1.65 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of Forfar Athletic's games and 65% of Clyde's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 50%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Clyde has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.13 per game. Forfar Athletic takes 7.9 shots per game, while Clyde takes 9.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Forfar Athletic leads at halftime in 52% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Clyde leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.88 after halftime.

When the teams score

Forfar Athletic's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Clyde, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League Two games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams. Forfar Athletic presents solid home form with 46% of home matches won and a goal difference of +3, yet their recent form (1.4 pts/game) raises some doubts. Clyde, on the other hand, is the master of away draws (58% of matches end in a split of points) and possesses an impressive goal difference of +13 in away games, making them a tough opponent. The visiting team has a better average of goals scored away (1.92) than the hosts do at home (1.62), as well as a better defense (0.83 vs 1.38 goals conceded). Considering Clyde's tendency to draw and the solid form of both teams, a share of the points is the most probable scenario, though Forfar's slight home advantage and recent victories at their own stadium give them a chance for a win.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

42Possession (%)58
Forfar AthleticClyde
6Shots14
Forfar AthleticClyde
3Shots on target7
Forfar AthleticClyde
0.88xG1.77
Forfar AthleticClyde
6Corners8
Forfar AthleticClyde
40Dangerous attacks55
Forfar AthleticClyde
10Fouls10
Forfar AthleticClyde
3Cards1
Forfar AthleticClyde

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Forfar AthleticClyde
1.4Goals scored / game1.65
Forfar AthleticClyde
1.48Goals allowed / game0.96
Forfar AthleticClyde
48%Average possession49%
Forfar AthleticClyde
3.88Shots on target / game5.27
Forfar AthleticClyde

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.88Shots per game9.85
Forfar AthleticClyde
3.88Shots on target5.27
Forfar AthleticClyde
17.8%Shot conversion16.8%
Forfar AthleticClyde
48%Possession49%
Forfar AthleticClyde
1.13xG for1.37
Forfar AthleticClyde
1.24xG against1.16
Forfar AthleticClyde

Shooting quality

Forfar Athletic: Efficient finishingClyde: Efficient finishing
Forfar AthleticClyde
Accuracy (shots on target)49%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Clyde is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Forfar Athletic · 1.6 pts / game - Clyde

Forfar Athletic
LLWWD
Season result split
32% W28% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-10
1.24 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Clyde
DWWDL
Season result split
35% W50% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-13-4
1.54 pts / game · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-1
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WDDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Clyde is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.4 goals / game - Forfar Athletic · 1.65 goals / game - Clyde

Clyde is 54% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.48 goals / game - Forfar Athletic · 0.96 goals / game - Clyde

Forfar Athletic scoring profile: strong

Forfar Athletic scores in 72% of games (18 of 25 meczów), while Clyde keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 meczów).

Clyde scoring profile: very strong

Clyde scores in 81% of games (21 of 26 meczów), while Forfar Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 meczów).

35Goals scored (season)43
Forfar AthleticClyde
37Goals conceded (season)25
Forfar AthleticClyde
2.88Average goals per game2.62
Forfar AthleticClyde
5Goals scored (last 5)10
Forfar AthleticClyde
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Forfar AthleticClyde

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal81%
Forfar AthleticClyde
36%2 goals35%
Forfar AthleticClyde
16%3 goals23%
Forfar AthleticClyde
16%4 goals15%
Forfar AthleticClyde

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal65%
Forfar AthleticClyde
44%2 goals23%
Forfar AthleticClyde
24%3 goals8%
Forfar AthleticClyde
4%4 goals0%
Forfar AthleticClyde

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time23%
Forfar AthleticClyde
16%BTTS in both halves0%
Forfar AthleticClyde
28%Scored in both halves27%
Forfar AthleticClyde

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Forfar AthleticClyde
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Forfar AthleticClyde
40%BTTS - last 540%
Forfar AthleticClyde

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Forfar AthleticClyde
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Forfar AthleticClyde
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Forfar AthleticClyde

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Forfar AthleticClyde
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Forfar AthleticClyde
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Forfar AthleticClyde

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Forfar Athletic is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.88 pts / game - Forfar Athletic · 1.31 pts / game - Clyde

Forfar Athletic - half-time state
52% leading32% draw16% trailing
Clyde - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.88Points per game (1st half)1.31
Forfar AthleticClyde
0.84Goals scored (1st half)0.77
Forfar AthleticClyde
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
Forfar AthleticClyde
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.31
Forfar AthleticClyde
60%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Forfar AthleticClyde
40%No goal before half-time46%
Forfar AthleticClyde

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.77
Forfar AthleticClyde
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Forfar AthleticClyde
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Forfar AthleticClyde
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.31
Forfar AthleticClyde
36%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Forfar AthleticClyde
60%No goal after half-time46%
Forfar AthleticClyde

Forfar Athletic - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
47
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding62%

Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 32%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Clyde - second-half results

46% W38% D15% L
34
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Forfar Athletic - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Clyde - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.40
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Forfar Athletic
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
8
7
16-30
9
3
31-45
4
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Clyde
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
8
4
16-30
10
9
31-45
7
5
46-60
7
1
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-76%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Forfar Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Clyde

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Forfar AthleticLigaClyde
Average goals per game 2.882.96 2.62
Both teams scored 56%65% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%56% 50%
Clean sheets 28%21% 35%
Goal before half-time 76%76% 77%
Goal after half-time 76%79% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per game
65%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.54
Away goals / game
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-8%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Forfar AthleticSubstitutionOn: Scott ShepherdOff: Craig Slater
  2. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Brian KinnearOff: Jay Hogarth
  3. Forfar AthleticYellow cardJake Dolzanski
  4. Forfar AthleticYellow cardAron Lynas
  5. Forfar AthleticGoalJake SutherlandAssist: Matty Allan
  6. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Kyle ConnellOff: Scott Williamson
  7. ClydeYellow cardCraig Howie
  8. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Sam CampbellOff: Aiden McGinlay
  9. Forfar AthleticYellow cardStuart Morrison
  10. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Kyle FlemingOff: Barry Cuddihy

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Joel KennedyMatches officiated: 10
6.4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 220%Home wins60%Draws20%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Forfar Athletic's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses against Clyde. Games average 0.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Clyde FC
1 : 1
Forfar Athletic FC
Forfar Athletic FC
0 : 0
Clyde FC
Clyde FC
0 : 0
Forfar Athletic FC

FAQ

What was the result of Forfar Athletic vs Clyde?

The League Two match finished Forfar Athletic 1:1 Clyde. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Forfar Athletic and Clyde?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Forfar Athletic won 0, Clyde won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 0.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Forfar Athletic vs Clyde?

Forfar Athletic score 1.40 goals per game on average and Clyde 1.65. The League Two average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Forfar Athletic's matches and 65% of Clyde's.

What form are Forfar Athletic and Clyde in?

Over the last 5 games Forfar Athletic have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Clyde 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forfar Athletic vs Clyde?

The statistical background for Forfar Athletic vs Clyde — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.