Forge FC vs Cavalry FC: match statistics
Forge FC vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Forge FC played against Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Forge FC has 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Cavalry FC has 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Forge FC scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 0.00. Cavalry FC scores 2.50 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.00 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Forge FC's games and 100% of Cavalry FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 100%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cavalry FC has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.31 per game. Forge FC takes 11.5 shots per game, while Cavalry FC takes 15.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Forge FC leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Cavalry FC leads at halftime in 100% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Forge FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Cavalry FC, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Canadian Premier League games average 3.00 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cavalry holds a clear advantage in form and offensive efficiency — they have scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches and won 4 of them, averaging 2.4 points per game over that span; Forge have scored 4 goals in their last 5 matches, won 2 and average 1.4 points per game. In chance creation the visitors also dominate: Cavalry average 16 shots and 7 on target per away match with an xG of 1.77, while Forge at home average 10 shots and 4 on target with an xG of 1.22, indicating higher-quality opportunities for Cavalry. A strong point for the home side is their home defense — Forge concede 0 goals per game at home on average, have 100% clean sheets and 100% wins on their own pitch, and average xG against of just 0.28. The balance of these metrics suggests Cavalry’s chance creation and finishing efficiency (11 goals in 5 matches, averaging 2 goals away) can tilt the outcome in favor of the visitors, although that pressure may run into a compact, well-organized Forge defense. On that basis I predict an away win, estimating Cavalry’s probability of victory at 50%, home win 30% and draw 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% (Forge 100%, Cavalry 100%) and both have featured in 100% of matches over 2.5 goals, indicating a strong scoring trend in their performances. In the last 5 matches there is divergence: Forge has 20% BTTS, averaging 0.8 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Cavalry has 80% BTTS, averaging 2.2 scored and 1.0 conceded. Shot and xG metrics confirm offensive potential — xG for is 1.64 for Forge and 1.77 for Cavalry, with xG against 1.32 and 1.13 respectively, and on average 15 and 16 shots with 6 and 7 on target per game. Considering the seasonal 100% BTTS, the higher xG 1.64 vs 1.77 and the fact Cavalry scored 11 goals in the last 5 matches, I assess the 'BTTS - Yes' scenario as more likely and price it at 70% versus 30% for 'No Goal'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The expected total goals, calculated as the average of the home team’s offensive xG and the opponent’s defensive xG, is approximately 2.94: Forge 1.39 = (1.64+1.13)/2, Cavalry 1.55 = (1.77+1.32)/2. This is clearly above the 1.5 line and slightly above 2.5, and the league average goals is 2.86, so the 2.94 projection is consistent with the league context. Season metrics show both teams have 100% of matches with BTTS and 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, and the percentage of matches over 2.5 goals this season is also 100% for both, which historically confirms the regularity of fixtures with at least two–three goals. In the last 5 matches Cavalry have averaged 2.2 goals (11 goals in 5), and Forge 0.8 goals (4 goals in 5), with last5 xG of 1.75 vs 1.18 respectively, which further increases the probability of several strikes in this matchup. As a result I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (I estimate a 95% chance), Over 2.5 I rate at around 68%, while Over 3.5 at around 28%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 2/2 — the away side (Cavalry FC) is likely to be leading at the break and to win the match. In their last 5 matches Cavalry have won 80% of games (4 of 5) and led at half-time in 60% of cases (3 of 5), and they scored 8 first-half goals compared to Forge’s 2. The away side’s xG is 1.77 versus the home side’s 1.64, and Cavalry average 16 shots and 7 on target per game vs Forge’s 15 shots and 6 on target, suggesting more created chances. Additionally, average xG against is 1.13 for the visitors versus 1.32 for the hosts, indicating a slightly more stable Cavalry defense; although the hosts have a higher shot conversion rate (20% vs 13%), recent form (Forge 40% wins in 5 matches vs Cavalry 80%) and the first-half goal advantage support the visitors holding the lead at the break and completing the turnaround to win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Forge FC | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cavalry FC is 67% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Forge FC · 2.5 goals / game - Cavalry FC
Forge FC scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
Cavalry FC scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Forge FC keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Forge FC
Over / Under - Cavalry FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cavalry FC is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Forge FC · 3 pts / game - Cavalry FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Forge FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cavalry FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Forge FC
Cavalry FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Forge FC | Liga | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.50 | 3.00 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 63% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 63% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 100% | 19% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | • 100% | 100% | • 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Forge FC's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses against Cavalry FC. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Forge FC vs Cavalry FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished Forge FC 0:0 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Forge FC and Cavalry FC?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Forge FC won 1, Cavalry FC won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Forge FC vs Cavalry FC?
Forge FC score 1.50 goals per game on average and Cavalry FC 2.50. The Canadian Premier League average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Forge FC's matches and 100% of Cavalry FC's.
What form are Forge FC and Cavalry FC in?
Over the last 5 games Forge FC have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Cavalry FC 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forge FC vs Cavalry FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


