Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildLaugardalsvöllurData current as of September 06, 2026

Fram vs FH: match statistics

Fram crest
Fram
0 : 0half-time 0:0
FH crest
FH

Fram vs FH: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Fram played against FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on July 26, 2026. Venue: Laugardalsvöllur. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Fram has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. FH has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Fram scores 2.73 goals per game and allows 1.87. FH scores 1.33 and allows 2.07. Games in this league average 4.07 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 73% of Fram's games and 67% of FH's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 60%, compared with league averages of 74% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Fram has the higher season xG average, 2.03 to 1.72 per game. Fram takes 17.7 shots per game, while FH takes 13.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Fram leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 1.40 goals per game after halftime. FH leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.47 after halftime.

When the teams score

Fram's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For FH, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Úrvalsdeild games average 4.07 goals. Both teams score in 74% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fram holds a clear home advantage: they sit 3rd and win 71% of their home matches, scoring an average of 3.43 goals and conceding 2.29 (home goal difference +8). FH are 11th, winning only 14% of away games, scoring 1.43 and conceding 2.86 on average, with an overall away goal difference of -10. Fram generates far more chances (avg. 17.57 shots and 6.86 on target per home match) and has a higher home xG of 2.07 versus 1.40 xG for FH away, clearly indicating better quality of created opportunities. Additionally, Fram have a lower share of matches without scoring (14% vs 29%) and have scored 12 goals in their last 5 fixtures (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), while FH have scored 6 and recorded 4 draws, limiting the visitors’ chances of a full points haul. Based on this I recommend a home win; I estimate probabilities of approx. 65% for Fram, 20% for a draw and 15% for an FH victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The “both teams to score” market looks more likely as Fram has BTTS at 63% and FH at 71%, versus a league average of 74%, indicating a strong scoring trend in the league. Fram generates 2.00 xG per game with an average of 5.75 shots on target and 15.5 shots, while FH allows opponents 2.25 xG and concedes 2.86 goals per game season-to-date, so the home side has clear opportunities to score. In the last 5 matches Fram averages 2.4 goals, FH 1.2 goals, and both teams have BTTS in 60% of recent matches each, which corroborates the seasonal signals. A counterpoint is that Fram has a 25% chance of a clean sheet over the season and concedes 1.8 goals on average in the last 5, but FH has no clean sheets (0%) and a high percentage of matches over 2.5 goals (86%), so the scenario where both teams score is stronger. Given the above figures (63% vs 71% BTTS, league 74%, xG 2.00 vs 2.25 and FH’s seasonal 2.86 conceded), I assign 78% probability to BTTS - Yes and 22% to No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and offensive metrics yield expected goals of 2.13 for Fram and 1.55 for FH, totaling 3.68. Calculations are based on xG: Fram generates xG 2.0 per match while FH concedes xG 2.25 (2.13 average for the home side); FH posts xG 1.4 against Fram’s defense, which concedes xG 1.7 (1.55 average for the away side). With this lambda, a Poisson model produces a high probability of Over 1.5 goals (~88%) and a significant probability of Over 2.5 goals (~71%); additionally the league averages 4.04 goals per game and 73% of matches exceed 2.5 goals. Both teams have a high BTTS rate: Fram 63% and FH 71%, and FH concedes on average 2.86 goals per match, which favors an elevated total. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (over), although Over 2.5 also has meaningful backing (≈71%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal concerns the Half-Time market: Fram led at the break in 4 of 8 matches (50%), while FH were trailing at half-time in 5 of 7 games (71%), clearly favoring the home side in the first 45 minutes. The numbers are supported by offensive and defensive metrics: Fram average 1.0 goals by half-time and concede 0.38, whereas FH score 0.71 and concede 1.86; over the full match FH concede an average of 2.86 goals, and the home side’s xG is 2.0 versus xG against FH 2.25, indicating Fram’s superiority in chances. On the other hand, season-long and recent form show many draws and both-teams-to-score outcomes — Fram record 50% draws at home, FH have 4 draws in their last 5 matches (80%), and both teams score in 74% of league games, which increases the chance of an equalizer in the second half. As a result, my most likely pick is HT/FT 1/X (Fram leading at half-time, draw after 90 minutes) at roughly 30% probability, with the strongest alternative scenario being 1/1 (around 18%) due to FH’s defensive weakness.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
FramFH
17Shots15
FramFH
3Shots on target2
FramFH
1.86xG1.48
FramFH
11Corners4
FramFH
80Dangerous attacks54
FramFH
5Fouls5
FramFH
1Cards0
FramFH

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.73Goals scored / game1.33
FramFH
1.87Goals allowed / game2.07
FramFH
46%Average possession44%
FramFH
6.2Shots on target / game5.13
FramFH

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

17.73Shots per game13.6
FramFH
6.2Shots on target5.13
FramFH
15.4%Shot conversion9.8%
FramFH
46%Possession44%
FramFH
2.03xG for1.72
FramFH
1.47xG against1.95
FramFH

Shooting quality

Fram: Counter-attackingFH: Balanced
FramFH
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Fram is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Fram · 1.4 pts / game - FH

Fram
LWDWW
Season result split
67% W20% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-2
2.20 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
FH
DDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
13% W40% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-7
0.80 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.13Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fram is 105% better for: goals scored per game.

2.73 goals / game - Fram · 1.33 goals / game - FH

Fram is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.87 goals / game - Fram · 2.07 goals / game - FH

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 meczów).

FH scoring profile: very strong

FH scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 meczów).

41Goals scored (season)20
FramFH
28Goals conceded (season)31
FramFH
4.6Average goals per game3.4
FramFH
12Goals scored (last 5)6
FramFH
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
FramFH

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal73%
FramFH
73%2 goals47%
FramFH
60%3 goals13%
FramFH
33%4 goals0%
FramFH

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal87%
FramFH
53%2 goals53%
FramFH
33%3 goals40%
FramFH
7%4 goals20%
FramFH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

47%BTTS at half-time27%
FramFH
20%BTTS in both halves7%
FramFH
53%Scored in both halves7%
FramFH

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
FramFH
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
FramFH
60%BTTS - last 560%
FramFH

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
FramFH
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
FramFH
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
FramFH

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
FramFH
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
FramFH
47%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
FramFH

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fram is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / game - Fram · 1.33 pts / game - FH

Fram - half-time state
47% leading40% draw13% trailing
FH - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per game (1st half)1.33
FramFH
1.33Goals scored (1st half)0.87
FramFH
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)1.07
FramFH
2.2Average goals (1st half)1.93
FramFH
47%Clean sheet before half-time47%
FramFH
33%No goal before half-time47%
FramFH

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per game (2nd half)0.87
FramFH
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
FramFH
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
FramFH
2.4Average goals (2nd half)1.47
FramFH
33%Clean sheet after half-time40%
FramFH
27%No goal after half-time73%
FramFH

Fram - second-half results

40% W33% R27% P
27
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FH - second-half results

20% W27% R53% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding39%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Fram - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game1.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game2.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
FH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.00
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Fram
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
6
1
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

FH
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

FH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

FramLigaFH
Average goals per game 4.604.07 3.40
Both teams scored 73%74% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%73% 60%
Clean sheets 13%14% 13%
Goal before half-time 73%83% 80%
Goal after half-time 93%88% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.07
Average goals per game
74%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.24
Home goals / game
1.83
Away goals / game
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
65%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
22%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FramSubstitutionOn: Kristófer KonrádssonOff: Már Ægisson
  2. FramSubstitutionOn: Jakob ByströmOff: Vuk Oskar Dimitrijevic
  3. FramYellow cardKennie Chopart

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Fram's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against FH. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 75% of them.

FH
3 : 4
Fram
FH Hafnarfjördur
3 : 4
Fram Reykjavík
FH Hafnarfjördur
2 : 2
Fram Reykjavík
Fram Reykjavík
2 : 0
FH Hafnarfjördur

FAQ

What was the result of Fram vs FH?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Fram 0:0 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Fram and FH?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Fram won 3, FH won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Fram vs FH?

Fram score 2.73 goals per game on average and FH 1.33. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Fram's matches and 67% of FH's.

What form are Fram and FH in?

Over the last 5 games Fram have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and FH 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fram vs FH?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.