Fram vs Valur: match statistics
Fram vs Valur: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Fram played against Valur in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on May 8, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Fram has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Valur has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Fram scores 3.00 goals per game and allows 1.80. Valur scores 2.20 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 3.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of Fram's games and 80% of Valur's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 100%, compared with league averages of 71% for BTTS and 74% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fram has the higher season xG average, 1.99 to 1.72 per game. Fram takes 16.6 shots per game, while Valur takes 14.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Fram leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 2.20 goals per game after halftime. Valur leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Fram's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Valur, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 3.94 goals. Both teams score in 71% of games, and 74% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fram holds an edge in chance quality and game control: home average xG is 1.84 versus Valur’s 1.51, and possession is 50% vs 38%. At home Fram averages 3.67 goals with 5.67 on-target shots and a 24% conversion rate, while Valur away averages 4.00 goals with 6.0 on-target shots and a higher conversion of ~29%. Defensively the hosts are more stable — Fram concedes 1.67 goals per home match with xG against 1.32, whereas Valur concedes 2.00 away with xG against 2.38, indicating greater risk from the visitors. Form is similar (Fram 3-1-1 in the last 5, averaging 2.0 points per game; Valur 3-0-2 averaging 1.8 points), but Fram remains unbeaten at home (0% losses, 67% wins), which favors the hosts. Considering Fram’s superior xG and game control I forecast a home win, though I expect an open, high-scoring game given average total goals of 5.33 for Fram and 6.0 for Valur.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes is that Valur has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% versus Fram's 75%, and in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 80% (league average 73%), indicating a high probability of goals from both sides. Additionally Valur has zero clean sheets this season (0%) and Fram only 25% clean sheets, so the risk of a match with one side shut out is low. Offensively, Fram scores 1.75 and concedes 1.75 on average, while Valur scores 4.0 and concedes 2.0; xG shows Fram with xG_for 1.77 and xG_against 2.13, and Valur with xG_for 1.51 and xG_against 2.38, indicating both teams create and concede scoring chances. Furthermore Valur has higher efficiency (conversion rate 29% with 6.0 shots on target vs Fram’s 12% and 4.75 shots on target) and both teams have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, which reinforces the Goal/Goal scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect a high-scoring game: I project approximately 2.08 xG for Fram and 1.82 xG for Valur, totaling ≈3.90. Both teams have extremely high goal-related profiles — seasonally both sides have 100% of matches Over 2.5 goals, and BTTS is 75% for Fram and 100% for Valur. Valur averages 4.0 goals per season and has a very high shot conversion rate of 29% (Fram 12%), with average shots on target 6.0 (Valur) vs 4.75 (Fram), which increases the likelihood of converting chances. The combined xG (Fram xG_for 1.77 vs Valur xG_against 2.38; Valur xG_for 1.51 vs Fram xG_against 2.13) supports the ~3.90 total and argues against a low-scoring outcome. For these reasons the strongest data signal is to play Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Valur is the clear favorite: they have won 100% of matches (winPercentage_away = 100.0) and average 4.0 goals per game, including 2.0 goals by half-time (seasonScoredAVG_away = 4.0, scoredAVGHT_away = 2.0). Fram led at the break in only 25% of cases (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 25.0) and average 1.25 goals by half-time (scoredAVGHT_home = 1.25), which limits the hosts’ chances of maintaining a lead. Despite the home side’s higher xG (xG 1.77 vs 1.51 for Valur), the visitors are much more efficient in conversion (shot_conversion_rate_away = 29.0 and shotsOnTargetAVG_away = 6.0), so the lower xG does not translate into fewer goals. Second-half statistics (AVG_2hg_away = 2.0 versus seasonConcededAVG_home = 1.75) and the fact Valur has 100% BTTS (seasonBTTSPercentage_away = 100.0) point toward a half-time draw with a Valur turnaround by full-time, therefore I select HT/FT = X/2 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Fram | Valur | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.56 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fram is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Fram · 1.8 pts / game - Valur
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fram is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
3 goals / game - Fram · 2.2 goals / game - Valur
Fram scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
Valur scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fram
Over / Under - Valur
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fram is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.6 pts / game - Fram · 1.2 pts / game - Valur
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fram - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Valur - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Fram
Valur
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| Fram | Liga | Valur | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.80 | 3.94 | • 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 16% | ▲ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 87% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Fram's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Valur. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Fram vs Valur?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished Fram 3:2 Valur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Fram and Valur?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Fram won 2, Valur won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Fram vs Valur?
Fram score 3.00 goals per game on average and Valur 2.20. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Fram's matches and 80% of Valur's.
What form are Fram and Valur in?
Over the last 5 games Fram have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Valur 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fram vs Valur?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fram vs Valur: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.