Fredericia vs Randers: match statistics
Randers FC presents itself as the favorite of this fixture despite playing away. The hosts, Fredericia, have very poor home form with a 55% loss rate and only 27% of home matches won, conceding an average of 2 goals per game. Their goal difference in home matches is -11, which indicates severe defensive issues. Randers, on the other hand, shows much better stability on the road, with 27% clean sheets and an average of only 1.18 goals conceded per away match. The visitors have better form in their last 5 matches (1.4 points per game vs 2.0 for the hosts), however, their higher defensive efficiency and better xG metrics (1.38 xG For vs 1.39 xG Against) give them the edge. Fredericia rarely wins at home, and with such a high number of goals conceded (49 this season), Randers has a real chance to take all three points.
Fredericia vs Randers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Fredericia played against Randers in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on March 13, 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Fredericia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Randers has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Fredericia scores 1.36 goals per game and allows 2.23. Randers scores 1.00 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 3.15 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Fredericia's games and 45% of Randers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 45%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Randers has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.29 per game. Fredericia takes 11.1 shots per game, while Randers takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Fredericia leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Randers leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.45 after halftime.
When the teams score
Fredericia's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Randers, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Superliga games average 3.15 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Randers FC presents itself as the favorite of this fixture despite playing away. The hosts, Fredericia, have very poor home form with a 55% loss rate and only 27% of home matches won, conceding an average of 2 goals per game. Their goal difference in home matches is -11, which indicates severe defensive issues. Randers, on the other hand, shows much better stability on the road, with 27% clean sheets and an average of only 1.18 goals conceded per away match. The visitors have better form in their last 5 matches (1.4 points per game vs 2.0 for the hosts), however, their higher defensive efficiency and better xG metrics (1.38 xG For vs 1.39 xG Against) give them the edge. Fredericia rarely wins at home, and with such a high number of goals conceded (49 this season), Randers has a real chance to take all three points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Fredericia | Randers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fredericia is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Fredericia · 1.4 pts / game - Randers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fredericia is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
1.36 goals / game - Fredericia · 1 goals / game - Randers
Randers is 81% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.23 goals / game - Fredericia · 1.23 goals / game - Randers
Fredericia scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 meczów), while Randers keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).
Randers scores in 64% of games (14 of 22 meczów), while Fredericia keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fredericia
Over / Under - Randers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fredericia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Randers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Fredericia
Randers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Fredericia | Liga | Randers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.59 | 3.15 | ▼ 2.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 61% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 23% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 76% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 75% | ▼ 45% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Fredericia's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Randers. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Fredericia vs Randers?
The Superliga match finished Fredericia 0:3 Randers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Fredericia and Randers?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Fredericia won 2, Randers won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Fredericia vs Randers?
Fredericia score 1.36 goals per game on average and Randers 1.00. The Superliga average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Fredericia's matches and 45% of Randers's.
What form are Fredericia and Randers in?
Over the last 5 games Fredericia have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Randers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fredericia vs Randers?
The statistical background for Fredericia vs Randers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.