Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 23 July 2026

FS Jelgava vs Tukums: match statistics

FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Tukums crest
Tukums
150%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

FS Jelgava is showing solid form with five draws in recent matches, indicating defensive solidity and difficulty in beating this team. The hosts occupy a higher position in the table (4th place) compared to Tukums (9th place), confirming their better season-long form. Tukums has displayed mixed form in their last five matches with a 1-2-2 record, pointing to issues with result consistency. The goal difference for both teams in recent games is similar (6:6 for Jelgava, 4:6 for Tukums), however, the hosts' advantage stems from their better league position and result stability. Considering the home advantage and higher points per game average, FS Jelgava has a greater chance of victory, although a draw cannot be ruled out given their recent streak.

FS Jelgava vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FS Jelgava play Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 8 March 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

FS Jelgava: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Tukums: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

FS Jelgava scores 1.04 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. Tukums scores 1.65 and concedes 2.04. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FS Jelgava 43%, Tukums 91%. Over 2.5: FS Jelgava 39%, Tukums 78%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.30. FS Jelgava: 10.6 shots per match, Tukums: 11.9.

Match halves

FS Jelgava: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.43. Tukums: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). Tukums: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 2-3-1. Average goals 3.17, BTTS 83%.

Match description

FS Jelgava is showing solid form with five draws in recent matches, indicating defensive solidity and difficulty in beating this team. The hosts occupy a higher position in the table (4th place) compared to Tukums (9th place), confirming their better season-long form. Tukums has displayed mixed form in their last five matches with a 1-2-2 record, pointing to issues with result consistency. The goal difference for both teams in recent games is similar (6:6 for Jelgava, 4:6 for Tukums), however, the hosts' advantage stems from their better league position and result stability. Considering the home advantage and higher points per game average, FS Jelgava has a greater chance of victory, although a draw cannot be ruled out given their recent streak.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
FS JelgavaTukums
10Shots12
FS JelgavaTukums
5Shots on target3
FS JelgavaTukums
1.42xG1.3
FS JelgavaTukums
5Corners6
FS JelgavaTukums
60Dangerous attacks45
FS JelgavaTukums
8Fouls17
FS JelgavaTukums
2Cards2
FS JelgavaTukums

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.04Goals scored / match1.65
FS JelgavaTukums
1.7Goals conceded / match2.04
FS JelgavaTukums
43%Average possession43%
FS JelgavaTukums
3.48Shots on target / match4.7
FS JelgavaTukums

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.61Shots per match11.91
FS JelgavaTukums
3.48Shots on target4.7
FS JelgavaTukums
9.8%Shot conversion13.9%
FS JelgavaTukums
43%Possession43%
FS JelgavaTukums
1.3xG for1.42
FS JelgavaTukums
1.73xG against1.68
FS JelgavaTukums

Shooting quality

FS Jelgava: BalancedTukums: Counter-attacking
FS JelgavaTukums
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FS Jelgava
WWWLL
Season result split
26% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Tukums
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W35% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-12
0.74 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.65 goals / match - Tukums

FS Jelgava is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.7 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 2.04 goals / match - Tukums

FS Jelgava scoring profile: very strong

FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

24Goals scored (season)38
FS JelgavaTukums
39Goals conceded (season)47
FS JelgavaTukums
2.74Average goals in match3.7
FS JelgavaTukums
11Goals scored (last 5)6
FS JelgavaTukums
6Goals conceded (last 5)15
FS JelgavaTukums

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal96%
FS JelgavaTukums
26%2 goals30%
FS JelgavaTukums
9%3 goals17%
FS JelgavaTukums
9%4 goals9%
FS JelgavaTukums

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal96%
FS JelgavaTukums
30%2 goals65%
FS JelgavaTukums
22%3 goals39%
FS JelgavaTukums
13%4 goals4%
FS JelgavaTukums

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time39%
FS JelgavaTukums
0%BTTS in both halves9%
FS JelgavaTukums
17%Scored in both halves26%
FS JelgavaTukums

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS70%
FS JelgavaTukums
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
FS JelgavaTukums
40%BTTS - last 5100%
FS JelgavaTukums

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
FS JelgavaTukums
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time65%
FS JelgavaTukums
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time26%
FS JelgavaTukums

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
FS JelgavaTukums
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
FS JelgavaTukums
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
FS JelgavaTukums

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FS Jelgava is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.09 pts / match - Tukums

FS Jelgava - half-time state
39% leading26% draw35% trailing
Tukums - half-time state
26% leading30% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.09
FS JelgavaTukums
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.83
FS JelgavaTukums
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)1.04
FS JelgavaTukums
1.22Average goals (1st half)1.87
FS JelgavaTukums
52%Clean sheet before half-time30%
FS JelgavaTukums
57%No goal before half-time39%
FS JelgavaTukums

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.13
FS JelgavaTukums
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
FS JelgavaTukums
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)1
FS JelgavaTukums
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.83
FS JelgavaTukums
39%Clean sheet after half-time26%
FS JelgavaTukums
70%No goal after half-time39%
FS JelgavaTukums

FS Jelgava - second-half results

26% W22% R52% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tukums - second-half results

26% W35% R39% P
25
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.82.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
5
3
31-45
1
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
11
16-30
11
8
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
8
61-75
12
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

FS JelgavaLigaTukums
Average goals in match 2.742.98 3.70
Both teams scored 43%56% 91%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%55% 78%
Clean sheets 17%24% 4%
Goal before half-time 78%75% 91%
Goal after half-time 83%84% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): FS Jelgava 2 - 3 - 1 Tukums. Average goals 3.17, both teams scored in 83% matches.

FS Jelgava
4 : 1
Tukums
Tukums
5 : 0
FS Jelgava
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 1
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Tukums?

The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 2:1 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Tukums?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 2, Tukums won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Tukums?

FS Jelgava score 1.04 goals per game on average and Tukums 1.65. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 43% of FS Jelgava's matches and 91% of Tukums's.

What form are FS Jelgava and Tukums in?

Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Tukums 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Tukums?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FS Jelgava vs Tukums: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.