Morocco - Botola ProData current as of September 03, 2026

FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: match statistics

FUS Rabat crest
FUS Rabat
1 : 0half-time 0:0
CODM Meknès crest
CODM Meknès

FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FUS Rabat played against CODM Meknès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on April 29, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

FUS Rabat has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. CODM Meknès has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

FUS Rabat scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 1.50. CODM Meknès scores 0.75 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 2.14 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of FUS Rabat's games and 25% of CODM Meknès's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 19%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FUS Rabat has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.04 per game. FUS Rabat takes 10.4 shots per game, while CODM Meknès takes 8.8.

First-half and second-half trends

FUS Rabat leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. CODM Meknès leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

FUS Rabat's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For CODM Meknès, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.14 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FUS Rabat holds a clear offensive edge in this matchup: at home they average 1.29 goals per game (19 total this season), have an average xG of 1.45 and 4.57 shots on target per match, while CODM Meknès score only 0.43 goals away, have xG 1.04 and just 1.57 shots on target. In the last five matches FUS scored 8 goals, won 3 games and average 1.8 points per match, whereas CODM have scored only 2 goals, won 2 matches and average 1.4 points per match in this period. Defensively the visitors are stronger on the road — they concede 1.0 goal per away game and kept a clean sheet in 43% of away appearances, while FUS at home concede 1.29 goals and have only 14% clean sheets. The difference in efficiency is significant: FUS converts about 12% of shots into goals versus 5% for CODM, and the share of matches without a goal is 14% for the hosts against 71% for the visitors, indicating the hosts more regularly turn created chances into goals. Considering the higher xG (1.45 vs 1.04), greater number of shots on target (4.57 vs 1.57) and better form over the last five games, I predict a FUS Rabat win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show low BTTS rates this season: FUS Rabat only 22% and CODM Meknès 29%, both well below the league average of 48%, indicating Goal/Goal outcomes are rare. FUS keeps a clean sheet in 67% of matches and concedes on average 0.56 goals per match this season, while CODM scores only 0.43 goals per match season-to-date and has scored 2 goals in the last 5 matches (0.4 avg), which significantly reduces the visitors' chances. In the last 5 fixtures FUS scored 8 and conceded 8 goals (1.6 avg) and registered 60% BTTS in that period, but CODM has 0% BTTS in the last 5, i.e. recently failed to produce matches with both teams scoring. Offensive metrics favor the home side: 2.89 SOT and 12% conversion versus 1.57 SOT and 5% conversion for the visitors, with similar xG 1.05 vs 1.04, suggesting CODM’s realistic ability to score is limited. Therefore I forecast BTTS - No (No Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project 1.10 goals for the home side and 0.60 for the visitors (total 1.70), which is clearly below the 2.5 line. Seasonal averages show FUS Rabat scores 1.0 and concedes 0.56 per match, while CODM Meknès scores 0.43 and concedes 1.0; xG for both teams is similar (1.05 for FUS and 1.04 for CODM). The strongest argument for Under 2.5 is the seasonal percentages: 89% of FUS matches and 71% of CODM matches finish below 2.5 goals, with FUS keeping 67% clean sheets and low BTTS rates of 22%/29%. In the last 5 matches FUS scored 8 goals (1.6 per game) and has last5 xG_for 1.45, which increases the overs risk, but the seasonal indicators (89%/71% under2.5) and the projected 1.70 goals give a clear edge to the Under 2.5 option, hence that line is my pick (I estimate its probability at ~84%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FUS Rabat is the clear favorite: they have a 67% win rate and average 1.0 goals scored per match versus 0.43 for CODM, with an average of 0.56 conceded for the home side vs 1.0 for the visitors. Both teams rarely score before half-time — the hosts are level at the break in 78% of matches, the visitors in 71%, and first-half goals average only 0.44 (FUS) and 0.43 (CODM). In the second half FUS is markedly stronger: they score an average of 0.78 goals after the break, record more than 0.5 goals in 89% of 2H matches and win 56% of second halves, while CODM in 2H score on average 0.29 and win only 14%. xG is similar (1.05 vs 1.04), but the hosts have more shots on target (2.89 vs 1.57) and better conversion (12% vs 5%), which supports a turnaround after half-time. Therefore I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of a draw at the break and a FUS victory at full-time (X/1) as the most likely, assigning it roughly a 50% probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
8Shots3
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
1Shots on target1
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
1.16xG0.68
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
8Corners3
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
80Dangerous attacks56
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
12Fouls11
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
0Cards3
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FUS RabatCODM Meknès
1.19Goals scored / game0.75
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
1.5Goals allowed / game0.75
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
49%Average possession49%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
3.88Shots on target / game2.31
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.38Shots per game8.75
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
3.88Shots on target2.31
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
11.4%Shot conversion8.6%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
49%Possession49%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
1.35xG for1.04
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
1.35xG against1.36
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

Shooting quality

FUS Rabat: BalancedCODM Meknès: Balanced
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
Accuracy (shots on target)37%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FUS Rabat is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - FUS Rabat · 1.4 pts / game - CODM Meknès

FUS Rabat
LWWWL
Season result split
31% W19% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-8
1.13 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CODM Meknès
DWLWL
Season result split
44% W31% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-4
1.63 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FUS Rabat is 59% better for: goals scored per game.

1.19 goals / game - FUS Rabat · 0.75 goals / game - CODM Meknès

CODM Meknès is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - FUS Rabat · 0.75 goals / game - CODM Meknès

FUS Rabat scoring profile: mixed

FUS Rabat scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 56% (9 of 16 meczów).

CODM Meknès scoring profile: very strong

CODM Meknès scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while FUS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 meczów).

19Goals scored (season)12
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
24Goals conceded (season)12
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
2.69Average goals per game1.5
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
8Goals scored (last 5)2
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal63%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
31%2 goals13%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
19%3 goals0%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
0%4 goals0%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal44%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
38%2 goals19%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
13%3 goals13%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
13%4 goals0%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time6%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
6%BTTS in both halves0%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
31%Scored in both halves0%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
60%BTTS - last 50%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time25%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FUS Rabat is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - FUS Rabat · 1.13 pts / game - CODM Meknès

FUS Rabat - half-time state
31% leading44% draw25% trailing
CODM Meknès - half-time state
13% leading75% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)1.13
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.19
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
1.19Average goals (1st half)0.44
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
56%Clean sheet before half-time88%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
50%No goal before half-time81%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per game (2nd half)1.44
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.06
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
38%Clean sheet after half-time56%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès
50%No goal after half-time56%
FUS RabatCODM Meknès

FUS Rabat - second-half results

19% W31% R50% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CODM Meknès - second-half results

38% W31% R31% P
18
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding338%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FUS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
CODM Meknès - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game0.40.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FUS Rabat
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
0
16-30
5
5
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

CODM Meknès
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.09
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FUS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CODM Meknès

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

FUS RabatLigaCODM Meknès
Average goals per game 2.692.14 1.50
Both teams scored 56%48% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%37% 19%
Clean sheets 13%32% 56%
Goal before half-time 69%59% 25%
Goal after half-time 81%74% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.14
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / game
1.02
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FUS RabatSubstitutionOn: Amine SouaneOff: Déo Gracias Bassinga
  2. CODM MeknèsYellow cardIsmael Benktib
  3. FUS RabatSubstitutionOn: Soufiane TaziOff: Lamina Diakité
  4. CODM MeknèsYellow cardAyoub Lourhraz
  5. CODM MeknèsSubstitutionOn: Karim L'KouchaOff: Mohamed Zinaf
  6. FUS RabatGoalAbdessamad MaherAssist: Moncef Amri
  7. CODM MeknèsYellow cardAymane Majid

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FUS Rabat's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against CODM Meknès. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

CODM Meknès
2 : 0
FUS Rabat

FAQ

What was the result of FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

The Botola Pro match finished FUS Rabat 1:0 CODM Meknès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

FUS Rabat score 1.19 goals per game on average and CODM Meknès 0.75. The Botola Pro average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 56% of FUS Rabat's matches and 25% of CODM Meknès's.

What form are FUS Rabat and CODM Meknès in?

Over the last 5 games FUS Rabat have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and CODM Meknès 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.