Morocco - Botola ProData current as of September 03, 2026

FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane: match statistics

FUS Rabat crest
FUS Rabat
2 : 1half-time 1:0
RSB Berkane crest
RSB Berkane

FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FUS Rabat played against RSB Berkane in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on June 28, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

FUS Rabat has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. RSB Berkane has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

FUS Rabat scores 1.04 goals per game and allows 1.22. RSB Berkane scores 1.37 and allows 0.93. Games in this league average 2.13 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 52% of FUS Rabat's games and 52% of RSB Berkane's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 41%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

RSB Berkane has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.39 per game. FUS Rabat takes 10.7 shots per game, while RSB Berkane takes 10.9.

First-half and second-half trends

FUS Rabat leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. RSB Berkane leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.63 after halftime.

When the teams score

FUS Rabat's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For RSB Berkane, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.13 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

RSB Berkane are favorites on paper: they sit 4th with 13 wins and a goal difference of 37:25, while FUS Rabat are 9th with 8 wins and a 28:33 record. In their last five matches RSB have scored 5 goals, collected 2 wins and average 1.6 points per game, whereas FUS have scored 3 goals, won only once and average 1.0 point per game. The visitors’ defense looks more compact — RSB concede 0.85 goals per away match versus 1.08 conceded by FUS at home, and clean sheets for the away side occur in 31% of trips compared to 23% for hosts. However, the hosts create better chances: FUS record 1.52 xG and 4.23 shots on target per home match, while RSB away post 1.22 xG and 2.69 shots on target; FUS’s issue is poorer finishing — only 1.00 goal at home with around 9% conversion, versus 1.15 goals and 11% conversion for the visitors. Considering RSB’s higher efficiency and superior defensive numbers (fewer goals conceded and more wins this season), I predict a narrow victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis indicates a slight edge for the "both teams to score" scenario — season BTTS rates are 57% for FUS Rabat and 46% for RSB Berkane versus a league average of 50%. A strong signal is that clean-sheet rates are 14% for the home side and 31% for the away side, meaning FUS scores in ~86% of matches and Berkane in ~69%; the product yields roughly a 59% chance both teams score. Additionally, FUS posts higher xG (1.65) and more SOT (4.5) than Berkane (xG 1.22, SOT 2.69), and Berkane’s average xG against is 1.37 — this favors goals from the hosts and a response from the visitors. The counterargument is form: in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 40% for both teams, and FUS scored 3 and conceded 6 (0.6 and 1.2 per match) in that period, which slightly undermines the reliability of long-term signals. Considering the 86%×69% ≈59% estimate from clean-sheet rates, the home season BTTS of 57% and FUS’s xG and SOT advantage, I recommend 'BTTS - Yes' with a probability of 60% (No 40%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and seasonal numbers point to a match with an elevated number of scoring opportunities: FUS Rabat has xG_for 1.65, while RSB Berkane as the away team concedes xG 1.37, yielding ~1.51 expected goals for the home side; RSB has xG_for 1.22, and the hosts concede xG 1.18, giving about 1.20 for the visitors, total expected goals = 2.71. Using a Poisson model with λ=2.71 the probability of Over 1.5 is roughly 75% (1 - P(0 or 1) ≈ 0.75), Over 2.5 about 51% (1 - P(≤2) ≈ 0.51), and Over 3.5 about 29%. Additionally, FUS registers more on-target shots (4.5 vs 2.69) and has a higher conversion rate (14% vs 11%), and seasonally Over 1.5 occurred in 64% of home matches and 54% of away matches, which supports the Over 1.5 scenario. However, one must account for FUS’s recent inefficiency in the last 5 games (3 goals, 0.6 avg), despite a recent xG of 1.75, suggesting a lack of finishing rather than a lack of chances. Therefore the strongest signal is betting Over 1.5 (line 1.5) — it has about a 75% probability and the highest confidence margin among the analyzed lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw: the home side record draws at half-time in 57% of matches and the away side in 54% (average ~55%), which strongly favors a score of X at 45 minutes. After the break the home team predominates — they score on average 1.57 goals per match versus 1.15 for the visitors, generate 1.65 xG compared to 1.22 for opponents and register 4.5 shots on target per match versus 2.69, all of which increases their chances of a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, the home side score on average 1.36 goals in the second half and notch 6 goals in the 61–75 minute window, while visitors concede 6 goals in minutes 76–90, which favors a home victory after the break. Taking into account the homes’ 57% win rate this season versus 38% for the away teams, the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
6Shots11
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
4Shots on target7
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
1.05xG1.7
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
3Corners4
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
53Dangerous attacks70
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
16Fouls9
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
6Cards0
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FUS RabatRSB Berkane
1.04Goals scored / game1.37
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
1.22Goals allowed / game0.93
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
50%Average possession54%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
3.74Shots on target / game3.63
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.7Shots per game10.89
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
3.74Shots on target3.63
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
9.7%Shot conversion12.6%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
50%Possession54%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
1.39xG for1.44
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
1.28xG against1.27
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

Shooting quality

FUS Rabat: BalancedRSB Berkane: Balanced
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

RSB Berkane is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - FUS Rabat · 1.6 pts / game - RSB Berkane

FUS Rabat
DDWLL
Season result split
30% W33% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-10
1.22 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-6-3
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DDDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
RSB Berkane
WLDWD
Season result split
48% W33% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-5
1.78 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RSB Berkane is 32% better for: goals scored per game.

1.04 goals / game - FUS Rabat · 1.37 goals / game - RSB Berkane

RSB Berkane is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.22 goals / game - FUS Rabat · 0.93 goals / game - RSB Berkane

FUS Rabat scoring profile: strong

FUS Rabat scores in 67% of games (18 of 27 meczów), while RSB Berkane keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 meczów).

RSB Berkane scoring profile: very strong

RSB Berkane scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while FUS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 meczów).

28Goals scored (season)37
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
33Goals conceded (season)25
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
2.26Average goals per game2.3
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
3Goals scored (last 5)5
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal78%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
26%2 goals41%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
11%3 goals11%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
0%4 goals7%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal67%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
30%2 goals19%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
7%3 goals7%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
7%4 goals0%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time22%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
4%BTTS in both halves7%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
26%Scored in both halves22%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
40%BTTS - last 540%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RSB Berkane is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / game - FUS Rabat · 1.67 pts / game - RSB Berkane

FUS Rabat - half-time state
30% leading41% draw30% trailing
RSB Berkane - half-time state
37% leading56% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per game (1st half)1.67
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.74
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.07
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
56%Clean sheet before half-time70%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
56%No goal before half-time56%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per game (2nd half)1.37
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.22
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane
52%No goal after half-time44%
FUS RabatRSB Berkane

FUS Rabat - second-half results

26% W37% R37% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

RSB Berkane - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
45
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FUS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
RSB Berkane - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.80
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FUS Rabat
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
7
7
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
6
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

RSB Berkane
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
5
4
16-30
10
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
8
5
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FUS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

RSB Berkane

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

FUS RabatLigaRSB Berkane
Average goals per game 2.262.13 2.30
Both teams scored 52%50% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%38% 41%
Clean sheets 22%31% 33%
Goal before half-time 70%61% 52%
Goal after half-time 74%72% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.13
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FUS RabatYellow cardAmine Souane
  2. RSB BerkaneGoalMounir ChouiarAssist: Haytam Manaout
  3. FUS RabatYellow cardAnas Serrhat
  4. FUS RabatYellow cardSalaheddine Cofi
  5. RSB BerkaneSubstitutionOn: Hamza RajiOff: Paul Valère Bassene
  6. FUS RabatSubstitutionOn: Aiman EchchennikhOff: Déo Gracias Bassinga
  7. RSB BerkaneSubstitutionOn: Imad RiahiOff: Oussama Lamlaoui
  8. FUS RabatYellow cardSalaheddine Cofi
  9. RSB BerkaneSubstitutionOn: Youness El KaabiOff: Youssef Mehri
  10. FUS RabatSubstitutionOn: Anas MakkaouiOff: Abdessamad Maher
  11. FUS RabatGoalChouaib Faidi
  12. FUS RabatYellow cardChouaib Faidi
  13. FUS RabatYellow cardAmine El Msane

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FUS Rabat's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against RSB Berkane. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?

The Botola Pro match finished FUS Rabat 2:1 RSB Berkane. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?

FUS Rabat score 1.04 goals per game on average and RSB Berkane 1.37. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 52% of FUS Rabat's matches and 52% of RSB Berkane's.

What form are FUS Rabat and RSB Berkane in?

Over the last 5 games FUS Rabat have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and RSB Berkane 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?

The statistical background for FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.