Gagra vs Torpedo Kutaisi: match statistics
Gagra vs Torpedo Kutaisi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gagra played against Torpedo Kutaisi in Erovnuli Liga (Georgia). The game was played on September 10, 2026. Venue: Stadioni Mtskheta Parki. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Gagra has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Torpedo Kutaisi has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Gagra scores 0.96 goals per game and allows 1.29. Torpedo Kutaisi scores 1.54 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of Gagra's games and 58% of Torpedo Kutaisi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 50%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Torpedo Kutaisi has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.33 per game. Gagra takes 10.3 shots per game, while Torpedo Kutaisi takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Gagra leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. Torpedo Kutaisi leads at halftime in 21% and scores 1.04 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gagra's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Torpedo Kutaisi, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Erovnuli Liga games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gagra draw as many as 42% of their home matches, while Torpedo Kutaisi share the points in 36% of their away fixtures, significantly increasing the likelihood of a closely contested game. The visitors have a slightly stronger attacking profile this season: they average 1.36 goals away from home compared with Gagra’s 1.08, and their shot conversion rate stands at 12% versus 9%. Gagra do, however, create more high-quality chances at home, recording an average xG of 1.51 compared with Torpedo’s 1.38, although they also allow opponents an xG of 1.59. Neither team has been convincing recently: Gagra have scored just 3 goals and collected 5 points in their last 5 matches, while Torpedo have conceded 12 goals during that period and lost 3 times. The visitors’ marginally better season numbers are offset by home advantage and Gagra’s strong tendency to draw, making a share of the points the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are moderately high, standing at 58% for Gagra and 55% for Torpedo Kutaisi, but the hosts’ current form clearly weakens the Goal/Goal scenario. Gagra have scored just 3 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.6 per game, while BTTS landed in only 20% of those fixtures. Torpedo have recently conceded as many as 2.4 goals per match, but Gagra have generated just 1.09 xG over this period, which does not provide strong evidence of an attacking breakthrough. The visitors should have chances to score, given their season average of 1.36 goals and Gagra’s defensive average of 1.25 goals conceded, although the hosts’ 33% clean-sheet rate further increases the risk of one team failing to score. BTTS - No is therefore the most likely outcome, primarily due to Gagra’s poor finishing in recent weeks.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The projected total of 2.53 goals is based on the combined xG averages: Gagra creates an average of 1.54 quality chances, while Torpedo Kutaisi averages 1.38. Both teams finish matches below 3.5 goals far more often: this applies to 75% of Gagra’s games and 73% of Torpedo’s matches. Gagra have scored just 3 goals in their last five appearances, or 0.6 per game, which limits the potential for a very high-scoring result, despite Torpedo conceding 12 goals during this period. The visitors have been more effective offensively in their current form, averaging 1.6 goals over their last five matches, but their profile also does not regularly point to games with at least four goals. The strongest option is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the season data for both teams clearly support a result in the 0–3 goal range.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Gagra were level after 45 minutes in 6 of 12 matches, including 4 of their last 5, conceding an average of 0.0 goals before the break in those games. Over the course of the season, however, the hosts have been clearly stronger in the opening phase: they score 0.75 goals before half-time and concede 0.42, while Torpedo score only 0.27 and concede 0.73. After the break, Gagra should increase the pressure, as their average xG is 1.54 compared with Torpedo's 1.44 xGA, while the visitors have conceded an average of 2.4 goals per match across their last five games. The hosts also have a higher season win rate, 42% versus 27%, so following a cautious first half, a home win at full-time is more likely than the draw being maintained. The risk remains moderate, as Torpedo have not lost any second half in the league this season, but the visitors' poor recent defensive record supports the X/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gagra | Torpedo Kutaisi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Torpedo Kutaisi is 60% better for: goals scored per game.
0.96 goals / game - Gagra · 1.54 goals / game - Torpedo Kutaisi
Torpedo Kutaisi is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.29 goals / game - Gagra · 1.17 goals / game - Torpedo Kutaisi
Gagra scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 games), while Torpedo Kutaisi keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 games).
Torpedo Kutaisi scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 games), while Gagra keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gagra
Over / Under - Torpedo Kutaisi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Torpedo Kutaisi is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / game - Gagra · 1.08 pts / game - Torpedo Kutaisi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gagra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Torpedo Kutaisi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gagra
Torpedo Kutaisi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Erovnuli Liga).
Teams vs league
| Gagra | Liga | Torpedo Kutaisi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.25 | 2.60 | ▲ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 57% | • 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 27% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 66% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gagra's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 4 losses against Torpedo Kutaisi. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 83% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gagra vs Torpedo Kutaisi?
The Erovnuli Liga match finished Gagra 1:1 Torpedo Kutaisi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gagra and Torpedo Kutaisi?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Gagra won 1, Torpedo Kutaisi won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gagra vs Torpedo Kutaisi?
Gagra score 0.96 goals per game on average and Torpedo Kutaisi 1.54. The Erovnuli Liga average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Gagra's matches and 58% of Torpedo Kutaisi's.
What form are Gagra and Torpedo Kutaisi in?
Over the last 5 games Gagra have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Torpedo Kutaisi 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gagra vs Torpedo Kutaisi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


