Gareji vs Saburtalo: match statistics
Gareji vs Saburtalo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gareji played against Saburtalo in Erovnuli Liga (Georgia). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 0:4.
Recent form
Gareji has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Saburtalo has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Gareji scores 1.12 goals per game and allows 1.42. Saburtalo scores 1.62 and allows 0.65. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Gareji's games and 38% of Saburtalo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 38%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Saburtalo has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.20 per game. Gareji takes 9.2 shots per game, while Saburtalo takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Gareji leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Saburtalo leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.88 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gareji's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Saburtalo, it is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Erovnuli Liga games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gareji | Saburtalo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Saburtalo is 275% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Gareji · 3 pts / game - Saburtalo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Saburtalo is 45% better for: goals scored per game.
1.12 goals / game - Gareji · 1.62 goals / game - Saburtalo
Saburtalo is 118% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.42 goals / game - Gareji · 0.65 goals / game - Saburtalo
Gareji scores in 64% of games (21 of 33 meczów), while Saburtalo keeps a clean sheet in 59% (20 of 34 meczów).
Saburtalo scores in 85% of games (29 of 34 meczów), while Gareji keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gareji
Over / Under - Saburtalo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Saburtalo is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / game - Gareji · 1.71 pts / game - Saburtalo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gareji - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Saburtalo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gareji
Saburtalo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Erovnuli Liga).
Teams vs league
| Gareji | Liga | Saburtalo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.55 | 2.63 | ▼ 2.26 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 51% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 47% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 28% | ▲ 59% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 66% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 85% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Gareji's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Saburtalo. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gareji vs Saburtalo?
The Erovnuli Liga match finished Gareji 0:4 Saburtalo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gareji and Saburtalo?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Gareji won 0, Saburtalo won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gareji vs Saburtalo?
Gareji score 1.12 goals per game on average and Saburtalo 1.62. The Erovnuli Liga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Gareji's matches and 38% of Saburtalo's.
What form are Gareji and Saburtalo in?
Over the last 5 games Gareji have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Saburtalo 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gareji vs Saburtalo?
The statistical background for Gareji vs Saburtalo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.