Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraCCM Kirumba StadiumData current as of August 30, 2026

Geita Gold vs Azam: match statistics

Geita Gold crest
Geita Gold
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Azam crest
Azam

Geita Gold vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Geita Gold played against Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on August 28, 2026. Venue: CCM Kirumba Stadium. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Geita Gold has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Azam has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.33 points per game.

Scoring records

Geita Gold scores 2.33 goals per game and allows 1.00. Azam scores 1.67 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Geita Gold's games and 100% of Azam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 67%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Geita Gold has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.57 per game. Geita Gold takes 10.0 shots per game, while Azam takes 9.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Geita Gold leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Azam leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Geita Gold's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Azam, it is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Azam remain unbeaten in the league, recording 2 wins and a draw, while in their last five matches they have won 4 times and drawn just once. The visitors are also clearly more solid defensively: they have conceded 3 goals in their last five games, whereas Geita Gold have allowed 7 and lost 3 of those five fixtures. The hosts are very dangerous at home, where they average 6 goals from 16 shots and 9 shots on target per match, but they also concede an average of 2 goals, with opponents creating chances worth 2.96 xG against them. Azam generate just 0.84 xG away from home and average 1 goal, so the hosts have genuine arguments for finding the net. However, the visitors' superior current form and greater defensive consistency slightly favor an Azam win. The match is expected to be closely contested, but Azam's edge in recent results justifies backing outcome 2.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS at 100% across the teams’ matches to date, combined with the absence of clean sheets on either side, points to a clear tendency for both teams to score. Geita Gold average 2.0 goals at home, with an xG of 1.94 and 6.5 shots on target per match, while Azam’s defense concedes an average of 1.0 goal and allows 1.69 xG. Azam have a weaker season-long attacking profile, with an xG of just 0.84, but they have improved their recent average to 1.8 goals and 1.62 xG over their last five matches. During the same period, the hosts conceded 1.4 goals per match, while their xGA stood at 1.61, giving the visitors a realistic route to finding the net. The latest BTTS figures—40% for Geita Gold and 60% for Azam—reduce confidence, but the hosts’ attacking edge and the visitors’ current scoring form support the BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Geita Gold create chances worth an average of 1.94 xG at home and register 6.5 shots on target per match, while Azam concede as much as 1.69 xG away from home. The hosts score an average of 2.0 goals, while Azam, despite a lower away xG of 0.84, average 1.0 goal, and both teams have scored in every match played so far. The Over 1.5 goals line has landed in 100% of both teams’ matches to date, clearly supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Caution regarding higher lines is warranted by the last five matches, in which each team recorded Over 2.5 in only 40% of cases, while Azam conceded just 0.6 goals per game during that period. The projected 2.70 goals gives Over 1.5 the safest edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Azam victory at the final whistle, as the visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, winning 80% of them and scoring an average of 1.8 goals. Azam were level at half-time in 60% of those fixtures, while conceding just 0.2 goals per match before the break, which points to a cautious opening. Geita Gold do have a home average xG of 1.94 and register an average of 6.5 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 3.0, but they have lost three of their last five outings and conceded an average of 1.4 goals. The hosts were trailing at half-time in 40% of their recent matches, whereas Azam have not been behind at the break in any of them. After half-time, the visitors score an average of 0.8 goals, and their current run of four wins in five matches further strengthens the likelihood of a turnaround in their favor in what could be an evenly balanced contest.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
Geita GoldAzam
15Shots22
Geita GoldAzam
4Shots on target10
Geita GoldAzam
1.8xG2.93
Geita GoldAzam
1Corners9
Geita GoldAzam
81Dangerous attacks118
Geita GoldAzam
15Fouls10
Geita GoldAzam
0Cards0
Geita GoldAzam

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.33Goals scored / game1.67
Geita GoldAzam
1Goals allowed / game1
Geita GoldAzam
51%Average possession54%
Geita GoldAzam
4Shots on target / game5.33
Geita GoldAzam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10Shots per game9
Geita GoldAzam
4Shots on target5.33
Geita GoldAzam
23.3%Shot conversion18.5%
Geita GoldAzam
51%Possession54%
Geita GoldAzam
1.64xG for1.57
Geita GoldAzam
1.73xG against1.42
Geita GoldAzam

Shooting quality

Geita Gold: Efficient finishingAzam: Efficient finishing
Geita GoldAzam
Accuracy (shots on target)40%59%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.580.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Azam is 17% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Geita Gold · 2.33 pts / game - Azam

Geita Gold
WLW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
Azam
DWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W33% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Geita Gold is 40% better for: goals scored per game.

2.33 goals / game - Geita Gold · 1.67 goals / game - Azam

Geita Gold scoring profile: very strong

Geita Gold scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).

Azam scoring profile: very strong

Azam scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Geita Gold keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).

7Goals scored (season)5
Geita GoldAzam
3Goals conceded (season)3
Geita GoldAzam
3.33Average goals per game2.67
Geita GoldAzam
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Geita GoldAzam
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
Geita GoldAzam

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
Geita GoldAzam
33%2 goals67%
Geita GoldAzam
33%3 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam
33%4 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
Geita GoldAzam
33%2 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam
0%3 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam
0%4 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam
33%BTTS in both halves0%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Scored in both halves33%
Geita GoldAzam

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Geita GoldAzam
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Geita GoldAzam
33%BTTS - last 5100%
Geita GoldAzam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Geita GoldAzam

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Geita GoldAzam

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Geita Gold is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Geita Gold · 1.67 pts / game - Azam

Geita Gold - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing
Azam - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1.67
Geita GoldAzam
1.33Goals scored (1st half)1
Geita GoldAzam
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Geita GoldAzam
2Average goals (1st half)1.33
Geita GoldAzam
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Geita GoldAzam
33%No goal before half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per game (2nd half)1.33
Geita GoldAzam
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Geita GoldAzam
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Geita GoldAzam
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Geita GoldAzam
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam
67%No goal after half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam

Geita Gold - second-half results

33% W67% R0% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Azam - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Geita Gold - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.67
Goals scored / game1.31.0
Goals allowed / game0.70.3
Average goals per game2.01.3
1 goal100%33%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals33%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 4
Azam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.671.33
Goals scored / game1.00.7
Goals allowed / game0.30.7
Average goals per game1.31.3
1 goal67%100%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Geita Gold
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Azam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Geita Gold

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
174%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Geita GoldLigaAzam
Average goals per game 3.332.48 2.67
Both teams scored 33%52% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%41% 67%
Clean sheets 33%24% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%78% 67%
Goal after half-time 33%74% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / game
0.96
Away goals / game
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defensive advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Geita Gold vs Azam?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Geita Gold 2:2 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Geita Gold vs Azam?

Geita Gold score 2.33 goals per game on average and Azam 1.67. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Geita Gold's matches and 100% of Azam's.

What form are Geita Gold and Azam in?

Over the last 5 games Geita Gold have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Azam 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Geita Gold vs Azam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.