Gençlerbirliği vs Amed: match statistics
Gençlerbirliği vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gençlerbirliği played against Amed in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Eryaman Stadyumu. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Gençlerbirliği has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Amed has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Gençlerbirliği scores 0.83 goals per game and allows 2.17. Amed scores 2.50 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 3.00 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Gençlerbirliği's games and 50% of Amed's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 83%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.25 per game. Gençlerbirliği takes 12.0 shots per game, while Amed takes 14.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Gençlerbirliği leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Amed leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gençlerbirliği's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For Amed, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Süper Lig games average 3.00 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed sit 1st and have won 4 of their 6 matches this season, while Gençlerbirliği are 14th with 2 wins. In their last five matches, the visitors have scored 12 goals and collected 10 points, compared with just 3 goals and 4 points for the hosts, who have conceded as many as 12 goals. However, Amed’s advantage is less pronounced away from home: they have failed to win either of their two away matches, averaging 1 goal scored and 2 conceded, while Gençlerbirliği have averaged 1.33 goals both scored and conceded at home. Chance quality also slightly favors the hosts in their home matches: their average xG is 1.43, compared with Amed’s 1.29 away from home. Despite these caveats, Amed’s clearly superior finishing and results in recent weeks point to an away win, although the risk of a draw remains significant.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Amed’s recent form supports both teams to score: the visitors have averaged 2.4 goals across their last five matches, while Gençlerbirliği have also conceded an average of 2.4 goals over that span. The hosts have managed just 0.6 goals per match in their last five, but their home average stands at 3.25, while Amed concede an average of 2.0 goals away from home. Average xG over the last five matches—1.31 for the hosts and 1.55 for the visitors—suggests that both sides are capable of creating chances. The risk of one team failing to score remains significant, as Amed have failed to score in 50% of their away matches, and the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their home games. Even so, Gençlerbirliği’s recent defensive struggles and Amed’s away goals conceded give a slight edge to BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In Gençlerbirliği’s last 5 matches, an average of 3.0 goals were scored, compared with 3.8 in Amed’s matches; at least 3 goals were scored in 60% and 80% of those games, respectively. An open game is suggested in particular by the hosts’ defense, which conceded an average of 2.4 goals during this period, while Amed scored 2.4 goals per match. On the other hand, the hosts average 3.25 goals scored at home, while the visitors concede 2.0 goals away, although Gençlerbirliği’s recent dip in scoring efficiency calls for a more cautious forecast. The estimated total of 3.20 goals supports backing the goals market, but given the discrepancy between the home figures and recent form, Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is Gençlerbirliği’s home advantage: the hosts have won all 4 home matches, scoring an average of 3.25 goals, while Amed have failed to win either of their 2 away matches and have conceded an average of 2 goals. The hosts are likely to lead at the break, having done so in 2 of their 4 home matches, while the visitors were trailing at half-time in both of their away games so far. After the break, Gençlerbirliği have scored an average of 2.25 goals at home, supporting the expectation that they will maintain or extend their lead. The hosts’ average xG of 1.64 compared with the visitors’ 1.29, as well as 6.5 shots on target per match versus 2.5, also support the 1/1 HT/FT pick. However, confidence is tempered by the teams’ overall form in their last 5 matches: Amed have won 3, while Gençlerbirliği have won just 1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gençlerbirliği | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Gençlerbirliği · 2 pts / game - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 201% better for: goals scored per game.
0.83 goals / game - Gençlerbirliği · 2.5 goals / game - Amed
Amed is 85% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.17 goals / game - Gençlerbirliği · 1.17 goals / game - Amed
Gençlerbirliği scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
Amed scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Gençlerbirliği keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gençlerbirliği
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Gençlerbirliği · 1.33 pts / game - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gençlerbirliği - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gençlerbirliği
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).
Teams vs league
| Gençlerbirliği | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.00 | 3.00 | ▲ 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 28% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Gençlerbirliği vs Amed?
The Süper Lig match finished Gençlerbirliği 2:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gençlerbirliği vs Amed?
Gençlerbirliği score 0.83 goals per game on average and Amed 2.50. The Süper Lig average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Gençlerbirliği's matches and 50% of Amed's.
What form are Gençlerbirliği and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Gençlerbirliği have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Amed 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gençlerbirliği vs Amed?
The statistical background for Gençlerbirliği vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.