Gençlerbirliği vs Göztepe: match statistics
Gençlerbirliği vs Göztepe: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gençlerbirliği played against Göztepe in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Gençlerbirliği has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Göztepe has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Gençlerbirliği scores 1.04 goals per game and allows 1.37. Göztepe scores 1.15 and allows 0.77. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Gençlerbirliği's games and 38% of Göztepe's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 38%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Göztepe has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.11 per game. Gençlerbirliği takes 10.4 shots per game, while Göztepe takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Gençlerbirliği leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Göztepe leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.65 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gençlerbirliği's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Göztepe, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Süper Lig games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Göztepe sit higher in the table (6th vs 13th) with 11 wins and 30 goals this season versus Gençlerbirliği's 6 wins and 28 goals. Gençlerbirliği average 1.46 goals at home with xG 1.35, while Göztepe score 1.08 away with xG 1.46, indicating the visitors create slightly better chances but convert them less often. Defensively season-to-date Göztepe perform better (20 conceded vs 37) and concede 1.00 goal on average away with 46% clean sheets, whereas hosts concede 1.38 at home with 23% clean sheets; however, in the last 5 matches the visitors have let in 8 goals versus 4 for the hosts, suggesting a short-term defensive issue for Göztepe. Finishing efficiency favors the home side: home conversion rate 12% versus 8% for the visitors and a lower share of matches without scoring (23% vs 31%) boost their chances in limited opportunities. Considering the visitors' season-long advantage but Göztepe's poor form in the last 5 (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses) along with Gençlerbirliği's better efficiency and marginal home edge, I forecast a draw as the most probable outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick BTTS - No, because the seasonal both-teams-to-score rate for both teams is only 38% (Gençlerbirliği 38%, Göztepe 38%), which already indicates a low probability of both teams scoring. Gençlerbirliği keep a clean sheet in 62% of matches and Göztepe in 46%, versus a league clean sheet rate of 56% — a strong signal that at least one team often doesn’t concede. In the last 5 matches the home side had BTTS in only 20% and the away side in 40%, while Göztepe concedes an average of 1.6 goals and scores only 0.6 goals per game despite a recent xG_for of 1.6, showing poor chance conversion. Seasonal xG are similar (1.5 for the home team vs 1.46 for the away), but actual goals per game are 1.23 vs 1.08 and shot conversion rates 9.0% vs 8.0%, which together favor a scenario where at least one team keeps a clean sheet; therefore I propose 70% on No and 30% on Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model (Gençlerbirliği xG_for 1.50 vs Göztepe xG_against 1.50) yields expected goals: Gençlerbirliği 1.50, Göztepe 1.33, total 2.83. At this total the Poisson distribution indicates probability of at least 2 goals ≈77%, which aligns with seasonal Over1.5 rates: 54% (home) and 69% (away) — average 61.5%. Over 2.5 is moderately likely – Poisson ≈53% – however seasonally both teams have only 38% of matches with >2.5 goals, and in the last 5 matches it's 20% (Gençlerbirliği) vs 60% (Göztepe), so the signal is mixed. Over 3.5 is weaker: Poisson ≈31% and seasonally only 15% of such matches for each team, so value on that line is low. As a result the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (≈77%), therefore I recommend backing the over on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hosts led at the break in 6 of 13 home matches (46%) and have 6 wins in 13 games (46%), suggesting leads at the break often convert into home victories. In the first half hosts score an average of 0.69 goals and concede only 0.15, while visitors score 0.31 before the break; hosts also average 1.92 points at half-time, reinforcing their advantage. Visitors are more active after the break (scoring an average of 0.77 goals in the second half), yet hosts have lost only 1 of 13 home matches (8%), so turnarounds are rare. Consequently the strongest signal is 1/1 (46%), the second significant scenario is X/X (46%), and the only material risk is losing after a draw at the break (X/2) at roughly 8%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gençlerbirliği | Göztepe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Göztepe is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Gençlerbirliği · 0.6 pts / game - Göztepe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Göztepe is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.04 goals / game - Gençlerbirliği · 1.15 goals / game - Göztepe
Göztepe is 78% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.37 goals / game - Gençlerbirliği · 0.77 goals / game - Göztepe
Gençlerbirliği scores in 63% of games (17 of 27 meczów), while Göztepe keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 meczów).
Göztepe scores in 69% of games (18 of 26 meczów), while Gençlerbirliği keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gençlerbirliği
Over / Under - Göztepe
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Göztepe is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Gençlerbirliği · 1.46 pts / game - Göztepe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gençlerbirliği - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 22%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Göztepe - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gençlerbirliği
Göztepe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).
Teams vs league
| Gençlerbirliği | Liga | Göztepe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.41 | 2.59 | ▼ 1.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 54% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 50% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 28% | ▲ 54% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 66% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 78% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Gençlerbirliği's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Göztepe. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gençlerbirliği vs Göztepe?
The Süper Lig match finished Gençlerbirliği 0:2 Göztepe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gençlerbirliği vs Göztepe?
Gençlerbirliği score 1.04 goals per game on average and Göztepe 1.15. The Süper Lig average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Gençlerbirliği's matches and 38% of Göztepe's.
What form are Gençlerbirliği and Göztepe in?
Over the last 5 games Gençlerbirliği have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Göztepe 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gençlerbirliği vs Göztepe?
The statistical background for Gençlerbirliği vs Göztepe — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


