Gençlerbirliği vs Rizespor: match statistics
Gençlerbirliği displays solid home form with a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference (+3). The hosts score an average of 1.7 goals per match at home, which surpasses Rizespor's away performance (1.4 goals). Rizespor has a very poor away record with only 10% of matches won and a high draw rate (60%), indicating a defensive approach but poor offensive efficiency. The last five encounters between both teams confirm the hosts' advantage – Gençlerbirliği has earned 1 point per match, while Rizespor only 0.6 points. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.39 vs 1.2), suggesting greater potential for creating goal-scoring opportunities. Taking all factors into account, I expect a Gençlerbirliği victory, although both teams' form is not impressive, which increases the probability of a draw.
Gençlerbirliği vs Rizespor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gençlerbirliği played against Rizespor in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on February 14, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Gençlerbirliği has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Rizespor has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Gençlerbirliği scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 1.48. Rizespor scores 1.14 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Gençlerbirliği's games and 57% of Rizespor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 52%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rizespor has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 1.15 per game. Gençlerbirliği takes 10.9 shots per game, while Rizespor takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Gençlerbirliği leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Rizespor leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.62 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gençlerbirliği's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Rizespor, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Süper Lig games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gençlerbirliği displays solid home form with a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference (+3). The hosts score an average of 1.7 goals per match at home, which surpasses Rizespor's away performance (1.4 goals). Rizespor has a very poor away record with only 10% of matches won and a high draw rate (60%), indicating a defensive approach but poor offensive efficiency. The last five encounters between both teams confirm the hosts' advantage – Gençlerbirliği has earned 1 point per match, while Rizespor only 0.6 points. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.39 vs 1.2), suggesting greater potential for creating goal-scoring opportunities. Taking all factors into account, I expect a Gençlerbirliği victory, although both teams' form is not impressive, which increases the probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gençlerbirliği | Rizespor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Gençlerbirliği is 250% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Gençlerbirliği · 0.4 pts / game - Rizespor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gençlerbirliği is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
1.24 goals / game - Gençlerbirliği · 1.14 goals / game - Rizespor
Gençlerbirliği is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.48 goals / game - Gençlerbirliği · 1.57 goals / game - Rizespor
Gençlerbirliği scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Rizespor keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).
Rizespor scores in 71% of games (15 of 21 meczów), while Gençlerbirliği keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gençlerbirliği
Over / Under - Rizespor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gençlerbirliği is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Gençlerbirliği · 1.14 pts / game - Rizespor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gençlerbirliği - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Rizespor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gençlerbirliği
Rizespor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).
Teams vs league
| Gençlerbirliği | Liga | Rizespor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.71 | 2.63 | • 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 57% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 51% | • 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 26% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 68% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 80% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gençlerbirliği's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Rizespor. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gençlerbirliği vs Rizespor?
The Süper Lig match finished Gençlerbirliği 2:2 Rizespor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gençlerbirliği vs Rizespor?
Gençlerbirliği score 1.24 goals per game on average and Rizespor 1.14. The Süper Lig average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Gençlerbirliği's matches and 57% of Rizespor's.
What form are Gençlerbirliği and Rizespor in?
Over the last 5 games Gençlerbirliği have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Rizespor 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gençlerbirliği vs Rizespor?
The statistical background for Gençlerbirliği vs Rizespor — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.