South Korea - K League 2Gimpo StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Gimpo Citizen vs Asan Mugunghwa: match statistics

Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Asan Mugunghwa crest
Asan Mugunghwa

Gimpo Citizen vs Asan Mugunghwa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gimpo Citizen play Asan Mugunghwa in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 5 July 2026 at 12:30. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Asan Mugunghwa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.41 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gimpo Citizen 53%, Asan Mugunghwa 59%. Over 2.5: Gimpo Citizen 35%, Asan Mugunghwa 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.41. Gimpo Citizen: 12.3 shots per match, Asan Mugunghwa: 10.9.

Match halves

Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65. Asan Mugunghwa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). Asan Mugunghwa: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I back the home win (1) because Gimpo have better form and home advantage: in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 points per game, while Asan in that period have 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, averaging 1.6 points per game. Gimpo’s chance-creation metrics favor them — the hosts average 15 shots and 3 on target at home with xG 1.81, whereas Asan away average 10.17 shots and 4.5 on target with xG 1.45. Gimpo score on average 2 goals in home matches and have had no games without scoring (0% such matches), while Asan score on average 1 goal away and have 50% of away matches without a goal, indicating the hosts are more likely to find the net. Defensively Asan are more compact on the road (conceding on average 1 goal away), and Gimpo concede on average 2 goals at home, so a draw or a match with multiple goals cannot be ruled out. Considering Gimpo’s advantage in xG (1.81 vs 1.45), higher shot volume (15 vs 10.17) and better form over the last 5 matches (2.2 vs 1.6 points per game), I assign the hosts a 60% chance to win, draw 25% and away 15%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
9Shots14
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
1Shots on target5
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
1xG1.63
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
4Corners7
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
49Dangerous attacks55
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
15Fouls11
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
4Cards2
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
1.18Goals scored / match1.41
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
1.12Goals conceded / match1.18
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
50%Average possession50%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
4Shots on target / match4.35
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.29Shots per match10.94
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
4Shots on target4.35
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
9.6%Shot conversion12.9%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
50%Possession50%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
1.52xG for1.41
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
1.27xG against1.37
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

Shooting quality

Gimpo Citizen: BalancedAsan Mugunghwa: Balanced
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Asan Mugunghwa is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.6 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Asan Mugunghwa
WDWDL
Season result split
35% W35% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-5
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Asan Mugunghwa is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.41 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Gimpo Citizen is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.18 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Asan Mugunghwa scoring profile: very strong

Asan Mugunghwa scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

20Goals scored (season)24
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
19Goals conceded (season)20
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
2.29Average goals in match2.59
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal76%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
29%2 goals47%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
12%3 goals18%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
0%4 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
35%2 goals35%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
6%3 goals12%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
0%4 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
6%BTTS in both halves12%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
24%Scored in both halves24%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
60%BTTS - last 560%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing
Asan Mugunghwa - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
1.06Average goals (1st half)1.29
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
47%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
59%No goal before half-time53%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.59Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.41
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.29
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
59%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa
41%No goal after half-time47%
Gimpo CitizenAsan Mugunghwa

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results

35% W53% R12% P
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Asan Mugunghwa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Asan Mugunghwa
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Asan Mugunghwa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimpo CitizenLigaAsan Mugunghwa
Average goals in match 2.292.75 2.59
Both teams scored 53%61% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%56% 53%
Clean sheets 29%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 65%73% 71%
Goal after half-time 88%76% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Gimpo Citizen 0 - 1 - 2 Asan Mugunghwa. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Asan Mugunghwa FC
1 : 0
Gimpo Citizen FC
Asan Mugunghwa FC
2 : 0
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
1 : 1
Asan Mugunghwa FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Asan Mugunghwa?

The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 0:2 Asan Mugunghwa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Asan Mugunghwa?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 0, Asan Mugunghwa won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Asan Mugunghwa?

Gimpo Citizen score 1.18 goals per game on average and Asan Mugunghwa 1.41. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 59% of Asan Mugunghwa's.

What form are Gimpo Citizen and Asan Mugunghwa in?

Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Asan Mugunghwa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Asan Mugunghwa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gimpo Citizen vs Asan Mugunghwa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.