India - I-LeagueData current as of September 04, 2026

Gokulam vs Shillong Lajong: match statistics

Gokulam crest
Gokulam
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Shillong Lajong crest
Shillong Lajong
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested rivalry between teams occupying adjacent positions in the table (6th and 7th place). Gokulam displays stable home form with a 33% win rate and only 0.67 goals conceded per match at home, yet their offensive efficiency is limited (1 goal per game, 7% shot conversion). Shillong Lajong has not lost any away match yet (100% draws), demonstrating higher shooting accuracy (11% conversion) and ball possession dominance (58%). Expected goals (xG) are very similar for both teams, suggesting an even quality of created chances. Considering Gokulam's low goal average per match (1.67) and the visitors' 100% draw efficiency away, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.

Gokulam vs Shillong Lajong: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Gokulam played against Shillong Lajong in I-League (India). The game was played on March 26, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Gokulam has 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.25 points per game. Shillong Lajong has 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.25 points per game.

Scoring records

Gokulam scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 0.50. Shillong Lajong scores 1.25 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.61 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 25% of Gokulam's games and 100% of Shillong Lajong's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 70% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Gokulam has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.44 per game. Gokulam takes 13.5 shots per game, while Shillong Lajong takes 8.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Gokulam leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Shillong Lajong leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Gokulam's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Shillong Lajong, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

I-League games average 2.61 goals. Both teams score in 70% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested rivalry between teams occupying adjacent positions in the table (6th and 7th place). Gokulam displays stable home form with a 33% win rate and only 0.67 goals conceded per match at home, yet their offensive efficiency is limited (1 goal per game, 7% shot conversion). Shillong Lajong has not lost any away match yet (100% draws), demonstrating higher shooting accuracy (11% conversion) and ball possession dominance (58%). Expected goals (xG) are very similar for both teams, suggesting an even quality of created chances. Considering Gokulam's low goal average per match (1.67) and the visitors' 100% draw efficiency away, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data strongly supports BTTS: both teams have a 100% BTTS match rate with 0% clean sheets and 0% matches without a goal scored. Goal models also point to goals from both sides, as Gokulam has an xG for of 1.37 against a high xG against Shillong Lajong of 1.80, while Shillong Lajong generates an xG for of 1.65 against an xG against Gokulam of 1.26. The visitors' attack looks active (averaging 7 shots on target), which increases the probability of them scoring at least once. The counterargument is Gokulam's recent defensive form (averaging only 0.4 goals conceded in their last5 and 20% BTTS), which raises the risk of a clean sheet at the back. Despite this, with the league BTTS rate at 71% and very poor CS/FTS seasonal metrics for both sides, the most likely pick remains BTTS: Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The expected goals model indicates 2.60 goals in the match (1.38 for Gokulam and 1.22 for Shillong Lajong), which statistically favors scenarios with at least 2 goals. Both teams have 0% clean sheets and 100% BTTS in the seasonal data, as well as 100% of matches with over 1.5, which strengthens the base probability of Over 1.5. The away side generates a high volume of shots on target (7.0 SOT/match) and a high xG for (1.65), while the visitors' defense concedes a high xG against (1.8), which boosts the scoring potential of both sides. At the same time, the signal for Over 2.5 is less clear-cut (last 5 matches: over 2.5 for the home side 20%, for the away side 40%), so the 2.5 line is closer to 50/50. The 3.5 line remains clearly more 'underish' given such a profile (moderate total ~2.6 and historically 0% over 3.5 in the seasonal data of both teams). Therefore, the strongest and most probable play is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT signal is on Gokulam's side: according to season data, Shillong Lajong has been losing at half-time in 100% of matches, while Gokulam has been leading at the break in 33% of games, and in as many as 60% of their last 5 encounters. In the last 5 matches, Gokulam hasn't conceded a single goal in the first half (concededAVGHT 0.0), while Shillong Lajong has been conceding an average of 1.0 goals by half-time, which strongly boosts the 1/1 scenario. For the full-time, the hosts are also slight favorites in terms of results (PPG 1.33 vs 1.0; better form in L5: 1.6 vs 1.0) and defensively based on the trend (L5 conceded 0.4 vs 1.2). At the same time, both teams have a 100% BTTS record this season with no clean sheets, and the visitors generate high xG (1.65) and many shots on target (7.0), so a significant portion of the probability also falls on variants involving a draw or a comeback. Overall, the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time outcome remains: Gokulam taking a lead at the break and carrying the victory through to the end.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
GokulamShillong Lajong
12Shots13
GokulamShillong Lajong
6Shots on target4
GokulamShillong Lajong
1.85xG1.71
GokulamShillong Lajong
3Corners1
GokulamShillong Lajong
94Dangerous attacks84
GokulamShillong Lajong
-1Fouls-1
GokulamShillong Lajong
3Cards0
GokulamShillong Lajong

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

GokulamShillong Lajong
0.75Goals scored / game1.25
GokulamShillong Lajong
0.5Goals allowed / game1.25
GokulamShillong Lajong
50%Average possession57%
GokulamShillong Lajong
3.5Shots on target / game3.75
GokulamShillong Lajong

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.5Shots per game8.25
GokulamShillong Lajong
3.5Shots on target3.75
GokulamShillong Lajong
5.6%Shot conversion15.2%
GokulamShillong Lajong
50%Possession57%
GokulamShillong Lajong
1.58xG for1.44
GokulamShillong Lajong
1.47xG against1.39
GokulamShillong Lajong

Shooting quality

Gokulam: BalancedShillong Lajong: Efficient finishing
GokulamShillong Lajong
Accuracy (shots on target)26%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Gokulam
DDLW
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 0%
Shillong Lajong
DWLD
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shillong Lajong is 67% better for: goals scored per game.

0.75 goals / game - Gokulam · 1.25 goals / game - Shillong Lajong

Gokulam is 150% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.5 goals / game - Gokulam · 1.25 goals / game - Shillong Lajong

Gokulam scoring profile: very strong

Gokulam scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

Shillong Lajong scoring profile: very strong

Shillong Lajong scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Gokulam keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 meczów).

3Goals scored (season)5
GokulamShillong Lajong
2Goals conceded (season)5
GokulamShillong Lajong
1.25Average goals per game2.5
GokulamShillong Lajong
3Goals scored (last 5)5
GokulamShillong Lajong
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
GokulamShillong Lajong

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
GokulamShillong Lajong
25%2 goals25%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%3 goals0%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%4 goals0%
GokulamShillong Lajong

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%2 goals25%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%3 goals0%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%4 goals0%
GokulamShillong Lajong

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

70%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%BTTS in both halves0%
GokulamShillong Lajong
25%Scored in both halves25%
GokulamShillong Lajong

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GokulamShillong Lajong
25%BTTS - last 5100%
GokulamShillong Lajong

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
GokulamShillong Lajong

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
GokulamShillong Lajong
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
GokulamShillong Lajong

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gokulam is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Gokulam · 1 pts / game - Shillong Lajong

Gokulam - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Shillong Lajong - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1
GokulamShillong Lajong
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
GokulamShillong Lajong
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
GokulamShillong Lajong
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
GokulamShillong Lajong
100%Clean sheet before half-time25%
GokulamShillong Lajong
50%No goal before half-time50%
GokulamShillong Lajong

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)2.25
GokulamShillong Lajong
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
GokulamShillong Lajong
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
GokulamShillong Lajong
0.75Average goals (2nd half)1
GokulamShillong Lajong
50%Clean sheet after half-time75%
GokulamShillong Lajong
75%No goal after half-time25%
GokulamShillong Lajong

Gokulam - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Shillong Lajong - second-half results

75% W0% R25% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.8

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Gokulam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game0.50.3
Goals allowed / game0.00.5
Average goals per game0.50.8
1 goal50%75%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal50%75%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Shillong Lajong - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.25
Goals scored / game0.50.8
Goals allowed / game1.00.3
Average goals per game1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet25%75%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 0% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Gokulam
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Shillong Lajong
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
72%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+87%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Gokulam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.83
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.97
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
52%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Shillong Lajong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

GokulamLigaShillong Lajong
Average goals per game 1.252.61 2.50
Both teams scored 25%70% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%48% 50%
Clean sheets 50%17% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%74% 100%
Goal after half-time 75%91% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per game
70%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
17%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / game
1.17
Away goals / game
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
91%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GokulamSubstitutionOn: Harpreet SinghOff: Sachu Siby
  2. GokulamYellow cardHarpreet Singh
  3. Shillong LajongSubstitutionOn: Maxderidoff WahlangOff: Kenstar Kharshong
  4. Shillong LajongGoalTreimiki LamurongAssist: Damaitphang Lyngdoh
  5. GokulamYellow cardAmid Arezou
  6. GokulamYellow cardGursimrat Singh

Head-to-head

Record from Gokulam's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Shillong Lajong. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Gokulam FC
3 : 4
Shillong Lajong FC
Shillong Lajong FC
0 : 0
Gokulam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gokulam vs Shillong Lajong?

The I-League match finished Gokulam 0:2 Shillong Lajong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gokulam and Shillong Lajong?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Gokulam won 0, Shillong Lajong won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gokulam vs Shillong Lajong?

Gokulam score 0.75 goals per game on average and Shillong Lajong 1.25. The I-League average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Gokulam's matches and 100% of Shillong Lajong's.

What form are Gokulam and Shillong Lajong in?

Over the last 5 games Gokulam have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Shillong Lajong 1-2-1 (1.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gokulam vs Shillong Lajong?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gokulam vs Shillong Lajong: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.