Gol Gohar vs Fajr Sepasi: match statistics
Gol Gohar presents stable form with three wins and two draws in their last five matches, translating to a high 2.2 points per match. The hosts have the advantage in possession (57% vs 49%) and better xG statistics (1.04 vs 0.76), evidencing their offensive superiority. However, Fajr Sepasi shows remarkable efficiency in away matches, scoring an average of 1.25 goals with an xG of just 0.76, suggesting high clinicality in finishing. A key factor is Fajr Sepasi's high percentage of away draws (63%), which, combined with the hosts' solid defense (50% clean sheets) but negative goal difference at home (-2), points to a closely contested clash. Considering all statistical data, the most likely scenario is a split of points, although the hosts hold a slight edge due to better current form and playing in front of their own crowd.
Gol Gohar vs Fajr Sepasi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gol Gohar played against Fajr Sepasi in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on January 23, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Gol Gohar has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Fajr Sepasi has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Gol Gohar scores 0.94 goals per game and allows 0.81. Fajr Sepasi scores 1.13 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 1.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 31% of Gol Gohar's games and 56% of Fajr Sepasi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 19% and 44%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gol Gohar has the higher season xG average, 1.02 to 0.76 per game. Gol Gohar takes 1.9 shots per game, while Fajr Sepasi takes 1.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Gol Gohar leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Fajr Sepasi leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gol Gohar's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Fajr Sepasi, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.75 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gol Gohar presents stable form with three wins and two draws in their last five matches, translating to a high 2.2 points per match. The hosts have the advantage in possession (57% vs 49%) and better xG statistics (1.04 vs 0.76), evidencing their offensive superiority. However, Fajr Sepasi shows remarkable efficiency in away matches, scoring an average of 1.25 goals with an xG of just 0.76, suggesting high clinicality in finishing. A key factor is Fajr Sepasi's high percentage of away draws (63%), which, combined with the hosts' solid defense (50% clean sheets) but negative goal difference at home (-2), points to a closely contested clash. Considering all statistical data, the most likely scenario is a split of points, although the hosts hold a slight edge due to better current form and playing in front of their own crowd.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gol Gohar | Fajr Sepasi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | -11% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.54 | 0.72 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.07 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Gol Gohar is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Gol Gohar · 1.2 pts / game - Fajr Sepasi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fajr Sepasi is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
0.94 goals / game - Gol Gohar · 1.13 goals / game - Fajr Sepasi
Gol Gohar is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.81 goals / game - Gol Gohar · 1.13 goals / game - Fajr Sepasi
Gol Gohar scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while Fajr Sepasi keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).
Fajr Sepasi scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while Gol Gohar keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gol Gohar
Over / Under - Fajr Sepasi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gol Gohar is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / game - Gol Gohar · 1.31 pts / game - Fajr Sepasi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gol Gohar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Fajr Sepasi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gol Gohar
Fajr Sepasi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Gol Gohar | Liga | Fajr Sepasi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.75 | 1.75 | ▲ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 38% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 19% | 27% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 59% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Gol Gohar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Fajr Sepasi. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gol Gohar vs Fajr Sepasi?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Gol Gohar 2:0 Fajr Sepasi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gol Gohar vs Fajr Sepasi?
Gol Gohar score 0.94 goals per game on average and Fajr Sepasi 1.13. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Gol Gohar's matches and 56% of Fajr Sepasi's.
What form are Gol Gohar and Fajr Sepasi in?
Over the last 5 games Gol Gohar have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Fajr Sepasi 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gol Gohar vs Fajr Sepasi?
The statistical background for Gol Gohar vs Fajr Sepasi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


