Gorica vs Triglav: match statistics
Gorica vs Triglav: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gorica play Triglav in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Gorica: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Triglav: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gorica scores 1.03 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Triglav scores 2.40 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gorica 60%, Triglav 37%. Over 2.5: Gorica 53%, Triglav 57%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.32. Gorica: 9.9 shots per match, Triglav: 14.0.
Match halves
Gorica: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.57. Triglav: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33.
Goals by minute
Gorica: 16-30 (7 goals). Triglav: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Triglav is the clear favorite: across the season they have 15 wins and 60 goals, while Gorica has only 1 win and 20 goals. Recent form over the last five matches confirms the visitors' advantage — Triglav won 4 of the last 5 fixtures and averages 2.6 points per match in that period, whereas Gorica has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses and only 0.8 points per match. In terms of chance quality, Triglav on the road averages 14.45 shots and 5.55 on target, converts 16% into goals and scores 2.27 goals per game with xG 1.83, while Gorica at home posts 10.18 shots, 4 on target, 11% conversion, 1.09 goals per game and xG 1.32. Defensively the gap is also significant: Gorica concedes 1.55 goals at home on average with 18% clean sheets, whereas Triglav concedes 1.09 on the road with 55% clean sheets. Considering these figures (60 vs 20 seasonal goals, 2.6 vs 0.8 points per game in the last five and superiority in shots and efficiency), I forecast a Triglav win; a draw or a home victory appear unlikely.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gorica | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Triglav is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Gorica · 2 pts / match - Triglav
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 133% better for: goals scored per match.
1.03 goals / match - Gorica · 2.4 goals / match - Triglav
Triglav is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Gorica · 0.93 goals / match - Triglav
Gorica scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
Triglav scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Gorica keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Gorica
Over / Under — Triglav
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Gorica · 1.8 pts / match - Triglav
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gorica - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gorica
Triglav
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Gorica | Liga | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.53 | 2.82 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 50% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 53% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 28% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 81% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Gorica 0 - 0 - 1 Triglav. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gorica vs Triglav?
The 2. SNL match finished Gorica 0:1 Triglav. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gorica vs Triglav?
Gorica score 1.03 goals per game on average and Triglav 2.40. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Gorica's matches and 37% of Triglav's.
What form are Gorica and Triglav in?
Over the last 5 games Gorica have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Triglav 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gorica vs Triglav?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.