Grasshopper vs Lugano: match statistics
Lugano is in significantly better form than Grasshopper, as evidenced by 4 wins in their last 5 matches and a high PPG of 2.4. The hosts are only in 11th place in the table with just a 20% home win rate and a negative streak (only 1 win in their last 5 matches). Lugano, as the league's second-placed team, boasts a 50% away win rate and an advantage in possession (58% vs 47%), indicating control of the game. The difference in expected goals (xG For: 1.67 vs 1.45) and scoring statistics (Lugano with 37 goals this season vs Grasshopper's 28) further confirm the visitors' advantage. Considering the hosts' poor form, conceding an average of 1.7 goals per match at home, and Lugano's solid performance, an away win is expected.
Grasshopper vs Lugano: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Grasshopper played against Lugano in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on January 31, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Grasshopper has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Lugano has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Grasshopper scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.86. Lugano scores 1.76 and allows 1.24. Games in this league average 3.35 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Grasshopper's games and 57% of Lugano's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 57%, compared with league averages of 66% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lugano has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.46 per game. Grasshopper takes 12.9 shots per game, while Lugano takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Grasshopper leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Lugano leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.81 after halftime.
When the teams score
Grasshopper's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Lugano, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.35 goals. Both teams score in 66% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lugano is in significantly better form than Grasshopper, as evidenced by 4 wins in their last 5 matches and a high PPG of 2.4. The hosts are only in 11th place in the table with just a 20% home win rate and a negative streak (only 1 win in their last 5 matches). Lugano, as the league's second-placed team, boasts a 50% away win rate and an advantage in possession (58% vs 47%), indicating control of the game. The difference in expected goals (xG For: 1.67 vs 1.45) and scoring statistics (Lugano with 37 goals this season vs Grasshopper's 28) further confirm the visitors' advantage. Considering the hosts' poor form, conceding an average of 1.7 goals per match at home, and Lugano's solid performance, an away win is expected.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Grasshopper | Lugano | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lugano is 275% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Grasshopper · 3 pts / game - Lugano
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lugano is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Grasshopper · 1.76 goals / game - Lugano
Lugano is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.86 goals / game - Grasshopper · 1.24 goals / game - Lugano
Grasshopper scores in 71% of games (15 of 21 meczów), while Lugano keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 meczów).
Lugano scores in 86% of games (18 of 21 meczów), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Grasshopper
Over / Under - Lugano
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lugano is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.24 pts / game - Grasshopper · 1.71 pts / game - Lugano
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 19%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Lugano - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +9 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Grasshopper
Lugano
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Grasshopper | Liga | Lugano | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.19 | 3.35 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 62% | 66% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 68% | ▼ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 19% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 83% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Grasshopper's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Lugano. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Grasshopper vs Lugano?
The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:1 Lugano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Lugano?
Grasshopper score 1.33 goals per game on average and Lugano 1.76. The Super League average is 3.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Grasshopper's matches and 57% of Lugano's.
What form are Grasshopper and Lugano in?
Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lugano 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Lugano?
The statistical background for Grasshopper vs Lugano — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.