Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne: match statistics
Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Greenville Triumph played against Fort Wayne in USL League One (United States). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Legacy Early College. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Greenville Triumph has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Fort Wayne has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Greenville Triumph scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 1.65. Fort Wayne scores 1.48 and allows 1.26. Games in this league average 2.93 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Greenville Triumph's games and 48% of Fort Wayne's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 52%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fort Wayne has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.50 per game. Greenville Triumph takes 13.0 shots per game, while Fort Wayne takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Greenville Triumph leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Fort Wayne leads at halftime in 48% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
Greenville Triumph's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Fort Wayne, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.93 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Greenville Triumph sit lower in the table, but they win 45% of their home matches and average 1.91 goals per game, while Fort Wayne score just 1.33 goals per away match. The hosts also create more quality chances: their average home xG stands at 1.74 compared with Fort Wayne’s 1.44 away from home, while shots on target are 5.73 to 4.25. Neither defense is particularly solid, with Greenville conceding an average of 1.55 goals at home and the visitors 1.50 away, which favors goals at both ends. Recent form is fairly even: Greenville have collected 5 points from five matches, compared with Fort Wayne’s 6, although the hosts conceded 7 goals during that period, versus 10 for their opponents. Home advantage and a clear edge in chance creation give Greenville Triumph slightly better chances of securing the win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The latest form clearly supports goals from both sides: Greenville recorded BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, while Fort Wayne did so in 60%. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, whereas the visitors scored 1.8 goals but allowed opponents to find the net 2.0 times per game. Fort Wayne created very good chances, posting an xG of 2.10 across their last five fixtures, while Greenville allowed opponents an xG of 1.62. The hosts’ attack also has favorable conditions, with a seasonal xG of 1.78, while the visitors’ defense concedes an average of 1.5 goals per match. However, the BTTS - Yes pick is not one-sided, as Greenville kept a clean sheet in 55% of their league matches and has a seasonal BTTS rate of just 36%. Nevertheless, the current attacking efficiency of both teams gives a slight edge to the scenario in which each side scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Greenville score an average of 1.64 goals per match, while Fort Wayne concede 1.50, which supports at least one goal for the home side. The visitors average 1.33 goals, whereas Greenville allow an average of 1.00, making their attacking contribution a realistic possibility as well. The 1.5 line was exceeded in 82% of Greenville’s matches and in as many as 92% of Fort Wayne’s games, providing very strong confirmation for the over. In their last five matches, the teams averaged a combined 3.0 and 3.8 goals respectively, while Fort Wayne conceded 10 goals during that period. The projected total of 2.72 goals indicates that Over 1.5 has by far the strongest edge, although at the 3.5 line, Greenville’s defensive stability, reflected in a 55% clean-sheet rate, should be taken into account.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Greenville Triumph has a clearly stronger home profile: they average 1.64 goals scored and concede just 1.00, while Fort Wayne allow opponents 1.50 goals away from home. The advantage is also evident in chance quality, with the hosts’ xG standing at 1.78 compared with 1.44 for the visitors, while Greenville average 5.55 shots on target against Fort Wayne’s 4.25. The hosts led at the break in 50% of their matches, whereas the visitors were trailing at half-time in 42% of their games, reinforcing the scenario of an early Greenville advantage. Greenville keep a clean sheet in 55% of matches, compared with just 17% for Fort Wayne, and after the break they average 0.90 goals scored and 0.50 conceded. The hosts’ last five appearances were weaker in the first halves, but their defensive stability and greater attacking potential primarily support the expectation that they will maintain their lead until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Greenville Triumph | Fort Wayne | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fort Wayne is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Greenville Triumph · 1.2 pts / game - Fort Wayne
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fort Wayne is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.22 goals / game - Greenville Triumph · 1.48 goals / game - Fort Wayne
Fort Wayne is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.65 goals / game - Greenville Triumph · 1.26 goals / game - Fort Wayne
Greenville Triumph scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 games), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 games).
Fort Wayne scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 games), while Greenville Triumph keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Greenville Triumph
Over / Under - Fort Wayne
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fort Wayne is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - Greenville Triumph · 1.7 pts / game - Fort Wayne
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Greenville Triumph - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Fort Wayne - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 39%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Greenville Triumph
Fort Wayne
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Greenville Triumph | Liga | Fort Wayne | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.87 | 2.93 | ▼ 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 59% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 59% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 23% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 81% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Greenville Triumph's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Fort Wayne. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne?
The USL League One match finished Greenville Triumph 1:3 Fort Wayne. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne?
Greenville Triumph score 1.22 goals per game on average and Fort Wayne 1.48. The USL League One average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Greenville Triumph's matches and 48% of Fort Wayne's.
What form are Greenville Triumph and Fort Wayne in?
Over the last 5 games Greenville Triumph have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Fort Wayne 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Greenville Triumph vs Fort Wayne?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


