Latvia - VirsligaData current as of September 06, 2026

Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics

Grobiņa crest
Grobiņa
1 : 1half-time 0:0
BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils

Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Grobiņa played against BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Grobiņa has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. BFC Daugavpils has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Grobiņa scores 0.56 goals per game and allows 1.11. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.33 and allows 1.56. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Grobiņa's games and 56% of BFC Daugavpils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 11% and 44%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

BFC Daugavpils has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.01 per game. Grobiņa takes 8.2 shots per game, while BFC Daugavpils takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Grobiņa leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.22 goals per game after halftime. BFC Daugavpils leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.78 after halftime.

When the teams score

Grobiņa's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For BFC Daugavpils, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Grobiņa have been unable to score at home — averaging 0 goals per game with 100% of home matches without a goal; they average 5.25 shots per game, 1.25 on target, and their home xG is 0.67 versus opponents’ xG 1.99, translating to a home goal difference of -7. BFC Daugavpils arrive in better form: 7 goals in the last 5 fixtures, 3 wins in those 5 matches and an average of 2 points per game; away they record 1.75 goals per game with 10 shots and 4 on target. Chance quality also favors the visitors — away xG for Daugavpils is 1.21 versus 0.67 for the hosts, and shot conversion is 18% for Daugavpils versus 0% for Grobiņa, increasing their likelihood of scoring. Defensively both teams are exposed: hosts concede 1.75 goals at home on average, visitors concede 2.75 away, and away matches average 4.5 goals, so I expect an open game with goals. Considering Grobiņa’s 0.4 points average over the last 5 matches versus BFC Daugavpils’ 2.0 and the hosts’ 100% of matches without a goal, I predict an away win and estimate their chances at around 75%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BFC Daugavpils has a season BTTS rate of 100% and averages 1.75 goals scored with 2.75 conceded, strongly indicating Goal/Goal outcomes in their matches. Grobiņa has a season BTTS of 20% and averages 1.0 goals scored, but BTTS has risen to 40% in the last 5 matches and the home side were scoring only 0.4 goals on average while conceding 1.4, so they have recently been more prone to letting goals in. Season xG shows 1.71 for Grobiņa versus 1.21 for BFC, however recent xG favors the visitors (1.8 vs 0.95), suggesting BFC creates more chances in form. Additionally, the visitors’ shot conversion is 18% versus 7% for the hosts, the league BTTS is 60%, and the visitors have 0% clean sheets this season compared to 40% CS for the hosts, therefore the strongest signal from the data points to a BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Calculated xG indicates 1.78 xG for Grobiņa and 1.21 xG for BFC Daugavpils, totaling 2.99 expected goals (offensive xG and opponent defensive xG averages: (1.71+1.85)/2 and (1.21+1.21)/2). A Poisson model with μ=2.99 yields P(Over 1.5)≈80%, P(Over 2.5)≈58% and P(Over 3.5)≈35%, so the strongest signal is Over 2.5. Season data support this: BFC away have 75% of matches over 2.5 and 100% BTTS, while Grobiņa at home have only 20% Over 2.5 and 40% clean sheets. Grobiņa average 13.4 shots with 5.6 on target, and BFC 10 shots with a high conversion rate of 18%, increasing the chance of converting chances. Therefore I recommend Over 2.5 as the best line — a moderate edge based on xG 2.99 and BFC’s 75% away Over 2.5 rate.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal statistics favor the home side: Grobiņa has a 60% win rate and a higher xG (1.71) than BFC Daugavpils (1.21), while conceding fewer expected goals (xGA 1.21 vs 1.85), indicating superior game control by the hosts. At Half-Time Grobiņa led in 40% of matches and were level in 60%, with an average of 0.6 goals scored by HT and a zero conceded HT average (concededAVGHT_home 0.0), showing first-half stability for the hosts. Matches tend to open up after the break: the average number of goals in away second halves is 3.25 (AVG_2hg_away 3.25) and away teams concede on average 2.0 goals after the break (conceded_2hg_avg_away 2.0), while the hosts produce more shots on target (5.6 vs 4.0), which supports potential turnarounds post-break. Considering the 60% HT draws for the hosts, the xG advantage of 1.71 vs 1.21 and Grobiņa’s seasonal 60% win rate versus the visitors’ 25%, the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1) estimated at 34%. At the same time, the hosts’ lower shot conversion (7% vs the visitors’ 18%) and the visitors’ better form in the last five matches (60% wins) increase the likelihood of turnarounds after the break, hence relatively higher probabilities for X/2 (14%) and 1/2 (11%) as alternatives.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

48Possession (%)52
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
11Shots17
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
2Shots on target4
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
1.22xG1.74
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
5Corners7
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
55Dangerous attacks55
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
28Fouls10
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
5Cards2
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0.56Goals scored / game1.33
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
1.11Goals allowed / game1.56
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
41%Average possession47%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
2.67Shots on target / game4.89
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.22Shots per game11.89
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
2.67Shots on target4.89
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
6.8%Shot conversion11.2%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
41%Possession47%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
1.01xG for1.49
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
1.52xG against1.5
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

Shooting quality

Grobiņa: BalancedBFC Daugavpils: Balanced
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
Accuracy (shots on target)32%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

BFC Daugavpils is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / game - Grobiņa · 2 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils

Grobiņa
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
22% W33% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 at home
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
BFC Daugavpils
WWWDL
Season result split
44% W11% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-4
1.44 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
LLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BFC Daugavpils is 138% better for: goals scored per game.

0.56 goals / game - Grobiņa · 1.33 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils

Grobiņa is 41% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.11 goals / game - Grobiņa · 1.56 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils

Grobiņa scoring profile: strong

Grobiņa scores in 56% of games (5 of 9 meczów), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: very strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)12
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
10Goals conceded (season)14
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
1.67Average goals per game2.89
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
2Goals scored (last 5)7
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal78%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0%2 goals44%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0%3 goals11%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0%4 goals0%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal78%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
22%2 goals33%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
11%3 goals22%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0%4 goals22%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0%BTTS in both halves0%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0%Scored in both halves22%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
40%BTTS - last 560%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BFC Daugavpils is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / game - Grobiņa · 1.56 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils

Grobiņa - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing
BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
33% leading56% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)1.56
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.56
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
1Average goals (1st half)0.89
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
56%Clean sheet before half-time78%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
67%No goal before half-time56%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)1.22
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
0.67Average goals (2nd half)2
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
56%Clean sheet after half-time22%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils
78%No goal after half-time44%
GrobiņaBFC Daugavpils

Grobiņa - second-half results

22% W33% R44% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

22% W33% R44% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.9

Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Grobiņa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
BFC Daugavpils - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.00
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Grobiņa
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
5
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
6
7
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Grobiņa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

GrobiņaLigaBFC Daugavpils
Average goals per game 1.672.83 2.89
Both teams scored 33%60% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 11%51% 44%
Clean sheets 22%20% 22%
Goal before half-time 67%77% 56%
Goal after half-time 67%85% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / game
1.51
Away goals / game
+-13%
Home attack advantage
+-14%
Home defensive advantage
+-21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GrobiņaYellow cardArtjoms Puzirevskis
  2. GrobiņaYellow cardMaksims Sidorovs
  3. BFC DaugavpilsGoalArtem HarzhaAssist: Rostand Ndjiki
  4. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Devids DobrecovsOff: Oļģerts Raščevskis
  5. BFC DaugavpilsSubstitutionOn: Mamadou SyllaOff: Abdoul Kader Traore
  6. GrobiņaYellow cardMaksims Fjodorovs
  7. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Artem KholodOff: Ivan Matyushenko
  8. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Dans SirbuOff: Maksims Fjodorovs
  9. GrobiņaYellow cardDevids Dobrecovs
  10. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardZiad Ouled-Haj-M'hand
  11. GrobiņaYellow cardGlebs Kļuškins
  12. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardJoel Yakubu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Grobiņa's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against BFC Daugavpils. Games average 3.40 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

BFC Daugavpils
0 : 1
Grobiņa
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
3 : 2
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
3 : 2
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
1 : 0
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
3 : 2
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils

FAQ

What was the result of Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils?

The Virsliga match finished Grobiņa 1:1 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grobiņa and BFC Daugavpils?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Grobiņa won 3, BFC Daugavpils won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils?

Grobiņa score 0.56 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.33. The Virsliga average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Grobiņa's matches and 56% of BFC Daugavpils's.

What form are Grobiņa and BFC Daugavpils in?

Over the last 5 games Grobiņa have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils?

The statistical background for Grobiņa vs BFC Daugavpils — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.