Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 23 July 2026

Grobiņa vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Grobiņa crest
Grobiņa
0 : 0half-time 0:0
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Grobiņa vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grobiņa play FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 11 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Grobiņa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. FS Jelgava: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grobiņa scores 0.65 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 1.04 and concedes 1.70. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grobiņa 35%, FS Jelgava 43%. Over 2.5: Grobiņa 22%, FS Jelgava 39%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

FS Jelgava has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.16. Grobiņa: 9.2 shots per match, FS Jelgava: 10.6.

Match halves

Grobiņa: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.26. FS Jelgava: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Grobiņa: 0-15 (4 goals). FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 3-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a clear advantage for FS Jelgava: the visitors average 1.35 xG in away matches versus the hosts' 0.78 xG and register 10.6 shots per game compared to Grobiņa’s 6.4. FS Jelgava also produces higher-quality chances and better finishing — 2.8 shots on target per match versus 1.4 for the hosts and an average of 0.6 away goals per game versus just 0.2 for Grobiņa. Grobiņa have scored only 2 goals and conceded 13 in their last 5 games, have 0% clean sheets at home and fail to score in 80% of home matches, which severely limits their prospects. The visitors have scored 4 goals in their last 5 matches, won 2 of 5 and average 1.2 points per game in that period, while Grobiņa average 0.4 points per game. Given the higher xG (1.35 vs 0.78), greater shot volume (10.6 vs 6.4) and a much lower share of matches without a goal for the visitors (40% vs 80%), I predict an FS Jelgava win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
9Shots9
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
1Shots on target2
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
1.09xG1.09
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
5Corners3
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
60Dangerous attacks50
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
22Fouls13
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
2Cards2
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

GrobiņaFS Jelgava
0.65Goals scored / match1.04
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
1.52Goals conceded / match1.7
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
42%Average possession43%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
3Shots on target / match3.48
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.22Shots per match10.61
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
3Shots on target3.48
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
7.1%Shot conversion9.8%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
42%Possession43%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
1.16xG for1.3
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
1.6xG against1.73
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Grobiņa: BalancedFS Jelgava: Balanced
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FS Jelgava is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Grobiņa
LDLWL
Season result split
17% W35% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-11
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
FS Jelgava
WWWLL
Season result split
26% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FS Jelgava is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

0.65 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.04 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Grobiņa is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.7 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Grobiņa scoring profile: strong

Grobiņa scores in 48% of matches (11 of 23 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: strong

FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

15Goals scored (season)24
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
35Goals conceded (season)39
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
2.17Average goals in match2.74
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
3Goals scored (last 5)11
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal57%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
9%2 goals26%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
9%3 goals9%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
0%4 goals9%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal83%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
39%2 goals30%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
17%3 goals22%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
4%4 goals13%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
4%BTTS in both halves0%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
9%Scored in both halves17%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
20%BTTS - last 540%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FS Jelgava is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1.43 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Grobiņa - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
39% leading26% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)1.43
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.61
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.22
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
57%Clean sheet before half-time52%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
70%No goal before half-time57%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

0.74Points per match (2nd half)1
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
0.26Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
1.09Average goals (2nd half)1.52
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
39%Clean sheet after half-time39%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava
74%No goal after half-time70%
GrobiņaFS Jelgava

Grobiņa - second-half results

9% W48% R43% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

26% W22% R52% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grobiņa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grobiņa
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
11
31-45
2
9
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
5
3
31-45
1
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grobiņa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

GrobiņaLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals in match 2.172.98 2.74
Both teams scored 35%56% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 22%55% 39%
Clean sheets 22%24% 17%
Goal before half-time 61%75% 78%
Goal after half-time 70%84% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Grobiņa 3 - 1 - 2 FS Jelgava. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FS Jelgava
2 : 0
Grobiņa
FS Jelgava
0 : 1
Grobiņa
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
3 : 2
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
0 : 1
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
FS Jelgava
1 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
1 : 1
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of Grobiņa vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Grobiņa 0:0 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grobiņa and FS Jelgava?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Grobiņa won 3, FS Jelgava won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grobiņa vs FS Jelgava?

Grobiņa score 0.65 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 1.04. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Grobiņa's matches and 43% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Grobiņa and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Grobiņa have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and FS Jelgava 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grobiņa vs FS Jelgava?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grobiņa vs FS Jelgava: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.