Gubbio vs Pianese: match statistics
Gubbio vs Pianese: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gubbio played against Pianese in Serie C Group B (Italy). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Gubbio has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Pianese has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Gubbio scores 0.85 goals per game and allows 0.94. Pianese scores 1.00 and allows 0.97. Games in this league average 2.26 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Gubbio's games and 45% of Pianese's. The Over 2.5 rates are 18% and 27%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pianese has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.19 per game. Gubbio takes 9.3 shots per game, while Pianese takes 10.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Gubbio leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.39 goals per game after halftime. Pianese leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.45 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gubbio's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Pianese, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group B games average 2.26 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a draw (X). Both teams show a clear propensity to share points — Gubbio draws 44% of home matches, while Pianese draws 56% of away matches, which increases the likelihood of a draw. Offensively both sides are inefficient: Gubbio averages 0.94 goals per home match with xG 1.22 and a conversion rate around 10%, whereas Pianese only scores 0.69 goals away with xG 1.17 and a 7% conversion, additionally failing to score in 50% of away fixtures. The visitors’ main advantage is defensive — Pianese concedes just 0.63 goals on average away and keeps 50% clean sheets, while Gubbio concedes 1.00 goal at home and has let in 10 goals in the last 5 matches. Considering Pianese’s better recent point return (1.2 points per match over the last 5 vs 0.8 for Gubbio) and the lower combined goals average (1.31 in Pianese away matches vs 1.94 for Gubbio), the most likely outcome is a low-scoring draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Based on the statistics, I predict BTTS - No as more likely — I assess 70% for 'no' and 30% for 'yes'. Pianese has a strong defense: they concede 0.63 goals per game on the season and keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches, and in the last 5 games they conceded only 4 goals (0.8 per game). Gubbio possess the better attack (1.29 goals scored on average, xG 1.40, 4.06 shots on target and 12% conversion), but in the last 5 rounds they conceded 10 goals (2.0 per game) and only 40% of their matches featured Goal/Goal. Pianese also have a weak scoring record — 0.69 goals on the season and only 3 goals in the last 5 matches (0.6 per game), with 50% of matches without scoring, which significantly reduces the probability of BTTS. In summary, despite Gubbio’s xG advantage (1.40 vs Pianese 1.17), Pianese’s defensive edge and frequent failure to score (seasonal BTTS rate: 59% Gubbio vs 31% Pianese) provide a stronger signal for 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total goals at around 2.30: Gubbio about 1.35 (xG_for 1.40 vs xG_against Pianese 1.30 → average 1.35) and Pianese about 0.95 (xG_for 1.17 vs xG_against Gubbio 1.38 suggested 1.28, but low shot conversion 7% and season goals average 0.69 lower the forecast). A strong argument for Over 1.5 is that Gubbio have 65% of matches >1.5, Pianese 56% (average 60.5%), and Gubbio have conceded an average of 2.0 goals in the last 5 matches (10 conceded in 5), which raises the Over 1.5 probability to about 78%. The 2.5 line gives mixed signals: season Over 2.5 is 47% for Gubbio versus only 6% for Pianese, and in the last 5 matches Gubbio have 60% Over 2.5 against 20% for Pianese, so I assess Over 2.5 at ~45%. Over 3.5 looks unlikely (seasonally 29% for Gubbio and 0% for Pianese, league average 2.26 goals), so I estimate Over 3.5 at ~18%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Strong signal for a draw at half-time: the home side drew at HT in 65% of matches and the away side in 69% of their fixtures, which supports X in the first half (our forecast gives a 64% combined chance of an HT draw). After the break the home team has a clear offensive edge — xG 1.40 versus the visitors' 1.17, on average 4.06 shots on target versus 2.94 and a higher conversion rate of 12% versus 7%, increasing the likelihood of a goal after the 45th minute. Additionally, hosts average 0.53 goals in the Second Half and score at least one goal after the break in 71% of matches, while visitors have 0.38 and 63%, suggesting the home side is more likely to break the deadlock. The away team, however, often draws and keeps clean sheets (draws 56% and clean sheets 50%), so the most probable scenario according to the data is X/1 — draw at Half-Time, home win Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gubbio | Pianese | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Pianese is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Gubbio · 1.2 pts / game - Pianese
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pianese is 18% better for: goals scored per game.
0.85 goals / game - Gubbio · 1 goals / game - Pianese
Gubbio scores in 64% of games (21 of 33 meczów), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 meczów).
Pianese scores in 61% of games (20 of 33 meczów), while Gubbio keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gubbio
Over / Under - Pianese
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pianese is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Gubbio · 1.3 pts / game - Pianese
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gubbio - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Pianese - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gubbio
Pianese
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Gubbio | Liga | Pianese | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.79 | 2.26 | ▼ 1.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 50% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 18% | 39% | ▼ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 30% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 63% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gubbio's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Pianese. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gubbio vs Pianese?
The Serie C Group B match finished Gubbio 1:1 Pianese. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gubbio vs Pianese?
Gubbio score 0.85 goals per game on average and Pianese 1.00. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Gubbio's matches and 45% of Pianese's.
What form are Gubbio and Pianese in?
Over the last 5 games Gubbio have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Pianese 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gubbio vs Pianese?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gubbio vs Pianese: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


