Guingamp vs Grenoble Foot 38: match statistics
Guingamp vs Grenoble Foot 38: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Guingamp played against Grenoble Foot 38 in Ligue 2 (France). The game was played on April 10, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Guingamp has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Grenoble Foot 38 has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Guingamp scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 1.41. Grenoble Foot 38 scores 0.97 and allows 1.21. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Guingamp's games and 55% of Grenoble Foot 38's. The Over 2.5 rates are 59% and 41%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Guingamp has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.25 per game. Guingamp takes 12.3 shots per game, while Grenoble Foot 38 takes 10.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Guingamp leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Grenoble Foot 38 leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.52 after halftime.
When the teams score
Guingamp's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). For Grenoble Foot 38, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligue 2 games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Guingamp are the favorites: over the season they have scored 38 goals versus Grenoble’s 28, and at home they have a 40% win rate with an average of 1.20 goals scored and 1.33 conceded per match. Chance quality favors the hosts — Guingamp’s home xG is 1.46 compared to Grenoble’s 1.25 xG on the road, while Grenoble concedes an average of 1.77 xG per away match and Guingamp allows only 1.19 xG. The hosts control play more often (57% possession vs 45%), attempt more shots (12.8 vs 10.36) and have a significantly higher clean sheet rate at home (40% vs 7%). Recent form also supports Guingamp: in the last 5 matches they scored 3 goals, registered 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 1.0 point per match, whereas Grenoble have not won in their last 5, scored 4 goals and average 0.6 points per match. Grenoble have a slightly higher shot conversion (11% vs 9%), but their high away loss rate (57%) and inferior defensive metrics suggest they will struggle to take all three points, so I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assign a 60% probability to No BTTS and 40% to BTTS - Yes. Guingamp at home averages 0.8 goals per match and has a 47% clean sheet rate; in the last 5 games they scored only 3 goals (0.6 avg) and conceded 5, indicating limited attacking efficiency from the home side. Grenoble records BTTS in 64% of matches this season and averages 1.14 goals per game, but concedes 1.57 goals on average and allows 1.77 xG, showing vulnerability to conceding. Both teams have similar xG_for at 1.25, which indicates chance creation, yet Guingamp fails to convert (xG_for 1.25 vs actual 0.8 goals), and their last 5 matches feature BTTS only 20% of the time. As a result, Guingamp’s 47% clean sheet rate and the home side’s low actual conversion outweigh Grenoble’s season BTTS rate, hence a stronger signal for “No Goal”.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model indicates about 1.51 expected goals for Guingamp (xG_for 1.25 vs opponent xG_against 1.77) and 1.32 for Grenoble (xG_for 1.25 vs opponent xG_against 1.38), totaling ≈2.83 goals. A Poisson distribution translates this to ~77% probability for Over 1.5, ~54% for Over 2.5 and ~32% for Over 3.5. Seasonal metrics support this picture: Grenoble concedes at least 1 goal in 93% of matches and records Over 1.5 in 64% of games, while Guingamp has Over 1.5 in 53% of matches and 47% clean sheets. Additionally, Guingamp averages 11.21 shots (3.57 on target), Grenoble 10.36 (4.29 on target) and has a higher shot conversion rate 11% vs 8%, increasing the likelihood of finishing chances. For these reasons the strongest signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a draw at Full-Time (X/X). Guingamp drew at the break in 67% of home matches and finished home games as draws in 60% of fixtures, while also keeping a clean sheet at Half-Time in 87% of home matches with an average of just 0.13 goals conceded by the break. Grenoble averages 0.5 goals by Half-Time away, but concedes 1.57 goals per away match and has a higher xG against on the road (1.77) than Guingamp (1.38), indicating the visitors have the weaker defense. Both teams have similar attacking xG (1.25 vs 1.25), but Guingamp’s advantage in maintaining draws and superior home points (1.4 points per game versus Grenoble’s 0.71 points per away game) increase the likelihood of X/X. Therefore I assign X/X 38%, with lower probabilities for X/1 at 20% and X/2 at 9%, and scenarios where either side holds a lead at Half-Time are less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Guingamp | Grenoble Foot 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Guingamp is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Guingamp · 0.6 pts / game - Grenoble Foot 38
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guingamp is 35% better for: goals scored per game.
1.31 goals / game - Guingamp · 0.97 goals / game - Grenoble Foot 38
Grenoble Foot 38 is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.41 goals / game - Guingamp · 1.21 goals / game - Grenoble Foot 38
Guingamp scores in 69% of games (20 of 29 meczów), while Grenoble Foot 38 keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 meczów).
Grenoble Foot 38 scores in 62% of games (18 of 29 meczów), while Guingamp keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Guingamp
Over / Under - Grenoble Foot 38
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grenoble Foot 38 is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.24 pts / game - Guingamp · 1.34 pts / game - Grenoble Foot 38
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Guingamp - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 34%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Grenoble Foot 38 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 21%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Guingamp
Grenoble Foot 38
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).
Teams vs league
| Guingamp | Liga | Grenoble Foot 38 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.72 | 2.44 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 50% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | • 31% | 31% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 65% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Guingamp's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Grenoble Foot 38. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Guingamp vs Grenoble Foot 38?
The Ligue 2 match finished Guingamp 1:1 Grenoble Foot 38. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Guingamp vs Grenoble Foot 38?
Guingamp score 1.31 goals per game on average and Grenoble Foot 38 0.97. The Ligue 2 average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Guingamp's matches and 55% of Grenoble Foot 38's.
What form are Guingamp and Grenoble Foot 38 in?
Over the last 5 games Guingamp have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Grenoble Foot 38 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Guingamp vs Grenoble Foot 38?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


