Gwangju vs Gangwon: match statistics
Gwangju vs Gangwon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gwangju played against Gangwon in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Gwangju has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Gangwon has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Gwangju scores 0.58 goals per game and allows 2.67. Gangwon scores 1.25 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 2.33 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Gwangju's games and 50% of Gangwon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 33%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gangwon has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.08 per game. Gwangju takes 8.4 shots per game, while Gangwon takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Gwangju leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Gangwon leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gwangju's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Gangwon, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.33 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Gangwon: the visitors are 4th with 4 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses this season, while Gwangju sit 12th with only 1 win, 3 draws and 8 losses. The form gap is clear — Gwangju have lost all of their last 5 matches (0 points), conceding 20 goals in that span, whereas Gangwon have scored 7 and conceded 4 in their last 5, averaging 1.6 points per game. Defensively the visitors are markedly better: the hosts concede 2.6 goals per home game on average and have failed to score in 60% of home matches, while Gangwon concede just 0.67 goals per away game and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their away fixtures. Chance creation also favors the visitors — away xG for Gangwon is 1.47 versus Gwangju’s 1.21 xG at home, average shots 11.33 vs 9 and higher possession 50% vs 43% indicate more quality opportunities for the visitors. Considering Gwangju’s 0 points and 20 goals conceded in the last five, plus Gangwon’s defensive edge and superior form, I predict an away win; suggested probabilities are approximately 72% away, 18% draw and 10% home.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS (Both Teams To Score) because Gwangju has conceded an average of 4.0 goals in the last 5 matches (20 goals in 5 games), while Gangwon scored 7 goals in that period, which strongly increases the visitors’ chance to find the net. Gwangju at home generates 1.92 xG, averages 15.33 shots and 4.83 on target with a 9% conversion rate, so the hosts can create chances and are capable of scoring. Gangwon has a season-long 67% clean sheets rate on the road and a seasonal BTTS of only 17%, but their BTTS in the last 5 matches is 60% and they conceded 4 goals (0.8 avg), meaning recently they have been more prone to allowing goals. Comparing xG 1.92 (Gwangju) versus 1.32 (xG against Gangwon) and seasonal average goals 1.33 for the hosts and 1.17 for the visitors, together with Gwangju conceding 20 in 5, the Both Teams To Score scenario looks more likely (~65%) than No BTTS (~35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.62 goals for the home side (xG_for_home 1.92 vs xG_against_away 1.32) and 1.19 for the visitors (xG_for_away 1.47 vs xG_against_home 0.90), totaling 2.81 expected goals. Gwangju has 100% of season matches with at least 2 goals (seasonOver15_home 100%), while Gangwon has 50% of such games, which pushes the probability of Over 1.5 to around 77%. Counterbalancing this, Gangwon kept 67% clean sheets and in only 17% of their matches did both teams score, limiting the chance of a very high-scoring game (I rate Over 3.5 at 31%). Additionally, Gwangju conceded an average of 4.0 goals in the last 5 matches, and Gangwon scored 7 goals in their last 5, which supports a multi-goal scenario; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal concerns the first half: Gangwon led at the break in 50% of their matches while Gwangju did so in only 17% (leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 50% vs leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 17%), and in the last 5 meetings Gwangju were trailing at halftime in 100% of cases (last5_trailingAtHTPercentage_overall_home = 100%). After the full match the visitors are also the favorites — Gangwon win 50% of games versus Gwangju’s 17% and average 1.67 points per match compared to the home side’s 1.17 (winPercentage_away 50%, winPercentage_home 17%, seasonPPG_away 1.67 vs seasonPPG_home 1.17). Although Gwangju generate higher xG (1.92 vs 1.47), the hosts are in very poor form 'lllll' and have conceded an average of 4.0 goals in their last 5 matches (xG_for_avg_home 1.92 vs xG_for_avg_away 1.47; last5_seasonConcededAVG_overall_home 4.0). Additionally, Gangwon keep more clean sheets across the season (67% vs 17%, seasonCSPercentage_away 67% vs seasonCSPercentage_home 17%), which increases the likelihood that the visitors’ lead at the break will be maintained to full time. Therefore the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gwangju | Gangwon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gangwon is 116% better for: goals scored per game.
0.58 goals / game - Gwangju · 1.25 goals / game - Gangwon
Gangwon is 222% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.67 goals / game - Gwangju · 0.83 goals / game - Gangwon
Gwangju scores in 33% of games (4 of 12 meczów), while Gangwon keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).
Gangwon scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gwangju
Over / Under - Gangwon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gangwon is 217% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.42 pts / game - Gwangju · 1.33 pts / game - Gangwon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gwangju - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Gangwon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -9 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gwangju
Gangwon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Gwangju | Liga | Gangwon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.25 | 2.33 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 51% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 29% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 77% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gwangju's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses against Gangwon. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gwangju vs Gangwon?
The K League 1 match finished Gwangju 0:0 Gangwon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gwangju and Gangwon?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gwangju won 0, Gangwon won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gwangju vs Gangwon?
Gwangju score 0.58 goals per game on average and Gangwon 1.25. The K League 1 average is 2.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Gwangju's matches and 50% of Gangwon's.
What form are Gwangju and Gangwon in?
Over the last 5 games Gwangju have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Gangwon 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gwangju vs Gangwon?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


