Gwangju vs Jeju United: match statistics
Gwangju vs Jeju United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gwangju played against Jeju United in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on September 9, 2026. Venue: Gwangju World Cup Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Gwangju has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Jeju United has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Gwangju scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 2.19. Jeju United scores 1.15 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Gwangju's games and 56% of Jeju United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 41%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Jeju United has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.13 per game. Gwangju takes 9.0 shots per game, while Jeju United takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Gwangju leads at halftime in 4% of its games and scores 0.41 goals per game after halftime. Jeju United leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gwangju's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Jeju United, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Jeju United sit 4th, while Gwangju are 12th, and the full-season record clearly favors the visitors: 10 wins and 31 goals scored compared with just 1 win and 16 goals for the hosts. At home, Gwangju average only 0.79 goals and fail to score in 50% of their matches, whereas Jeju score 1.30 goals per game away from home and fail to find the net in just 10% of matches. The hosts’ defense is a major concern, conceding an average of 2.07 goals at home with opponents posting an xG of 1.99, while Jeju allow their opponents just 0.90 goals away from home. The visitors also produce more shots per match, 11.5 compared with 9.14, and have a higher finishing efficiency, 11% versus 9%. Over their last five matches, Jeju have scored 7 and conceded only 5 goals, compared with Gwangju’s 6:10 record, making an away win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams regularly feature in matches with goals at both ends: the BTTS rate stands at 56% for Gwangju and 60% for Jeju United, compared with the league average of 52%. In their last five matches, both sides recorded BTTS in 60% of cases again, while Gwangju conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game during this period. Jeju average 1.30 goals per game this season and 1.4 in their last five matches, while the home defense allows opponents an xG of 1.54. Gwangju have the higher seasonal xG at 1.60, and Jeju allow opponents 1.71 xG, which clearly supports the hosts’ chances of scoring despite their average of 1.13 goals per game. The BTTS - Yes scenario is more likely, although Jeju’s solid defense, conceding an average of 0.9 goals, limits the strength of this betting angle.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Under 3.5, as at least 4 goals were scored in only 13% of Gwangju’s matches and 10% of Jeju’s matches throughout the season. Both teams also have solid clean-sheet rates, at 31% and 30% respectively, while Jeju concedes just 0.90 goals per game on average. Although Gwangju have conceded 2.0 goals per match across their last five outings, Jeju have scored 1.4 goals per game during that period, which supports a scoreline around 1:1 or 1:2 more than an open, high-scoring game. Their attacking potential is reflected in xG figures of 1.60 for the hosts and 1.39 for the visitors, so the expected 2.65 goals does not rule out Over 2.5, but it still remains clearly below the 3.5 line. Additionally, the league average stands at 2.44 goals, with only 44% of matches going over 2.5 goals, further strengthening the case for the lower 3.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time and a Jeju win after the final whistle, as both teams often start cautiously: Gwangju were level at the break in 44% of their matches, while Jeju recorded a half-time draw in 50%. First halves are also low-scoring, averaging 0.94 goals in Gwangju matches and 0.90 in Jeju matches, with the visitors conceding just 0.30 goals per game before the break. After half-time, the form advantage shifts towards Jeju: over their last five matches, they averaged 0.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while Gwangju scored only 0.4 and allowed 1.2 goals per game. Jeju also have a clearly better season-long record, earning 1.7 points per match compared with the hosts’ 1.31 and winning 50% of their fixtures compared with Gwangju’s 31% win rate. The hosts are in poorer form, having lost 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding an average of 2.0 goals during that period, which increases the visitors’ chances of deciding a closely contested match in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gwangju | Jeju United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Jeju United is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Gwangju · 1.6 pts / game - Jeju United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Jeju United is 72% better for: goals scored per game.
0.67 goals / game - Gwangju · 1.15 goals / game - Jeju United
Jeju United is 119% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.19 goals / game - Gwangju · 1 goals / game - Jeju United
Gwangju scores in 44% of games (12 of 27 games), while Jeju United keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 games).
Jeju United scores in 74% of games (20 of 27 games), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 27 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gwangju
Over / Under - Jeju United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jeju United is 117% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.63 pts / game - Gwangju · 1.37 pts / game - Jeju United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gwangju - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 4% of games and wins 4%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Jeju United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gwangju
Jeju United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Gwangju | Liga | Jeju United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.85 | 2.44 | ▼ 2.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 51% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 44% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 30% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 61% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Gwangju's perspective: 4 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Jeju United. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 17% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gwangju vs Jeju United?
The K League 1 match finished Gwangju 0:1 Jeju United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gwangju and Jeju United?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Gwangju won 4, Jeju United won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gwangju vs Jeju United?
Gwangju score 0.67 goals per game on average and Jeju United 1.15. The K League 1 average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Gwangju's matches and 56% of Jeju United's.
What form are Gwangju and Jeju United in?
Over the last 5 games Gwangju have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Jeju United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gwangju vs Jeju United?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gwangju vs Jeju United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


