Gwangju vs Ulsan: match statistics
Gwangju vs Ulsan: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gwangju play Ulsan in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 5 July 2026 at 12:30. Venue: Gwangju World Cup Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Gwangju: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Ulsan: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gwangju scores 0.53 and concedes 2.26 goals per match. Ulsan scores 1.42 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gwangju 37%, Ulsan 68%. Over 2.5: Gwangju 47%, Ulsan 58%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Ulsan has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.02. Gwangju: 8.0 shots per match, Ulsan: 15.3.
Match halves
Gwangju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.37. Ulsan: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
Gwangju: 46-60 (3 goals). Ulsan: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
5 H2H matches: 1-1-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 40%.
Match description
I back an Ulsan (2) win. Ulsan scored 22 goals this season and has 8 wins, while Gwangju has only 7 goals and 1 win, indicating the visitors’ superiority in season-long efficiency. In the last 5 matches Ulsan scored 5 goals and won 3 times, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Gwangju failed to score in their last five and average 0.2 points per game. The visitors create more chances: 13.29 average shots and 4.57 shots on target away versus 8.14 and 2.71 for the home side, and Ulsan’s xG 1.61 vs Gwangju 1.08 points to higher-quality opportunities for the visitors. Additionally, Gwangju concedes 2.00 goals on average at home and has shipped 14 goals in the last 5, while Ulsan concedes 1.14 away and only 5 in their last 5; Gwangju fail to score in 71% of home matches versus 29% for Ulsan, therefore I assign 70% for an away win, 18% for a draw and 12% for a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gwangju | Ulsan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gwangju is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Gwangju · 0.4 pts / match - Ulsan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ulsan is 168% better for: goals scored per match.
0.53 goals / match - Gwangju · 1.42 goals / match - Ulsan
Ulsan is 54% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.26 goals / match - Gwangju · 1.47 goals / match - Ulsan
Gwangju scores in 37% of matches (7 of 19 matches), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
Ulsan scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Gwangju
Over / Under — Ulsan
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ulsan is 138% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.53 pts / match - Gwangju · 1.26 pts / match - Ulsan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gwangju - second-half results
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ulsan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gwangju
Ulsan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Gwangju | Liga | Ulsan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.79 | 2.31 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 51% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 39% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 30% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 63% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | • 74% | 73% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Gwangju 1 - 1 - 3 Ulsan. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gwangju vs Ulsan?
The K League 1 match finished Gwangju 1:1 Ulsan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gwangju and Ulsan?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Gwangju won 1, Ulsan won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gwangju vs Ulsan?
Gwangju score 0.53 goals per game on average and Ulsan 1.42. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Gwangju's matches and 68% of Ulsan's.
What form are Gwangju and Ulsan in?
Over the last 5 games Gwangju have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Ulsan 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gwangju vs Ulsan?
The statistical background for Gwangju vs Ulsan — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.