South Korea - K League 2Changwon Football CenterData current as of September 07, 2026

Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics

Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam
5 : 0half-time 3:0
Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Gyeongnam played against Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on July 19, 2026. Venue: Changwon Football Center. Final score: 5:0.

Recent form

Gyeongnam has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Ansan Greeners has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Gyeongnam scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.56. Ansan Greeners scores 1.06 and allows 1.81. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 69% of Gyeongnam's games and 69% of Ansan Greeners's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 63%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Gyeongnam has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.22 per game. Gyeongnam takes 11.6 shots per game, while Ansan Greeners takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Gyeongnam leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.81 goals per game after halftime. Ansan Greeners leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

Gyeongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Ansan Greeners, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gyeongnam sits 9th in the table while Ansan are 15th; hosts have scored 20 goals this season versus the visitors’ 17, with Gyeongnam conceding 25 and Ansan 29. In the last 5 matches Gyeongnam’s record is 1-2-2 (avg. 1.0 point per match), whereas Ansan have 1-0-4 (avg. 0.6 pts/match); during that span the hosts conceded 7 goals and the visitors 12. At home Gyeongnam average 1.56 goals per game on 11.78 shots and 3.67 shots on target, and the share of matches without a goal is only 11%; Ansan away average 1.2 goals per game with as many as 40% of away matches goalless for them. In terms of quality of chances Gyeongnam record an average xG of 1.34 with xG against 1.22, while Ansan have away xG 1.18 but xG against 2.18, indicating the visitors allow opponents to create far better chances. Considering the hosts’ superior scoring efficiency, the low percentage of matches without a goal (11% vs 40%) and Ansan’s weaker defense over the last five fixtures, I forecast a Gyeongnam victory (probability 60%), draw 25% and away win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal for BTTS is that Gyeongnam has a season BTTS rate of 82% versus Ansan's 40%, with a league average of 63%, favoring the “both teams to score” option. The hosts have recorded zero clean sheets (0%), while the visitors have only 20% clean sheets; seasonally Gyeongnam has scored 20 and conceded 25, and Ansan has scored 17 and conceded 29, indicating both sides tend to concede. In the last 5 matches both teams show BTTS at 60%: Gyeongnam has xG 1.84 with 5 goals scored and 7 conceded (xG against 1.34), whereas Ansan has xG 1.31 with 4 scored and as many as 12 conceded (xG against 2.55), which shows the visitors have been heavily exposed recently. Additionally, average shots 9.45 vs 9.0, shots on target 3.91 vs 4.2 and conversion rates 11% vs 13% suggest both teams are creating real scoring opportunities, therefore I forecast BTTS - Yes (72%) versus 28% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and goal analysis indicates a moderately high scoring potential: Gyeongnam has xG 1.24 for the season and 1.84 in the last 5 matches, Ansan 1.18 for the season and 1.31 in the last 5; therefore I project 1.54 xG for the home side and 1.25 xG for the away side, totaling 2.79 goals. Strong signal for Over 1.5 comes from the fact that 91% of Gyeongnam’s home matches finished over 1.5 goals, and 80% of Ansan’s matches did as well — average 85.5% (rounded to 86%). The 2.5 line is less clear: seasonally Gyeongnam has 73% of matches Over 2.5, Ansan 40% (average 56.5%) and the league average for Over 2.5 is 56%, so I assess the probability of Over 2.5 at about 57%. Over 3.5 is unlikely — only 36% of home teams and 20% of away teams reached that (average 28%), so Under 3.5 looks safer. Additionally, hosts concede on average 2.0 goals per match, visitors 1.4, and home clean sheets are 0% (away 20%), which further emphasizes Over 1.5 as the optimal market.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The primary scenario is a Half-Time draw and an away win (X/2) — Ansan records 60% draws at the break in away matches and wins 40% of fixtures, whereas Gyeongnam win only 18% at home and lose as many as 73% of games. Hosts lead at the break in 18% of matches and are trailing at half-time in 45% of cases, averaging 0.55 goals scored and 0.82 conceded before the break, which increases the likelihood of a HT draw. After the interval Ansan scores on average 0.8 goals in second halves, while Gyeongnam concedes on average 1.18 goals after the break, so the visitors have greater potential to decide the match in the second half. The teams’ xG figures are similar (1.24 vs 1.18), but both sides have high xG against (2.04 and 2.18), so the game should be open with goals after the break. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the X/2 scenario (30%), with X/X (20%) and 2/2 (15%) as realistic alternatives.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
14Shots3
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
7Shots on target1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.85xG0.56
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
2Corners1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
65Dangerous attacks41
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
8Fouls8
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1Cards4
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.25Goals scored / game1.06
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.56Goals allowed / game1.81
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
50%Average possession46%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.5Shots on target / game4
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.56Shots per game9.31
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.5Shots on target4
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
10.8%Shot conversion11.4%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
50%Possession46%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.34xG for1.22
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.29xG against2.08
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Shooting quality

Gyeongnam: BalancedAnsan Greeners: Balanced
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
Accuracy (shots on target)30%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Gyeongnam is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 0.6 pts / game - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam
WLDWD
Season result split
31% W31% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-6
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Ansan Greeners
LLLLW
Season result split
25% W13% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-10
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 2.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gyeongnam is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.25 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1.06 goals / game - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.56 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1.81 goals / game - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam scoring profile: very strong

Gyeongnam scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 meczów).

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 meczów).

20Goals scored (season)17
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
25Goals conceded (season)29
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
2.81Average goals per game2.88
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
8Goals scored (last 5)4
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
8Goals conceded (last 5)11
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
38%2 goals19%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
13%3 goals6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%4 goals6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal94%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
50%2 goals56%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%3 goals31%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%4 goals0%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time31%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%BTTS in both halves0%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
25%Scored in both halves0%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
80%BTTS - last 560%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ansan Greeners is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 1 pts / game - Ansan Greeners

Gyeongnam - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing
Ansan Greeners - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per game (1st half)1
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.5
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.19
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
50%Clean sheet before half-time38%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
56%No goal before half-time50%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

After half-time (2nd half)

1.19Points per game (2nd half)0.88
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)1.13
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.69
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
44%Clean sheet after half-time50%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners
44%No goal after half-time75%
GyeongnamAnsan Greeners

Gyeongnam - second-half results

25% W44% R31% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding238%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

19% W31% R50% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Gyeongnam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ansan Greeners - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.6
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
5
31-45
2
6
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

GyeongnamLigaAnsan Greeners
Average goals per game 2.812.76 2.88
Both teams scored 69%63% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%56% 63%
Clean sheets 6%23% 6%
Goal before half-time 63%73% 81%
Goal after half-time 75%76% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GyeongnamGoalSang-Jun ChoAssist: Hyeon-Oh Kim
  2. Ansan GreenersYellow cardDong-Hyun Kang
  3. GyeongnamGoalHyun-Seo BaeAssist: Il-Lok Yun
  4. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: In-Sung KimOff: Marlon Roberto dos Santos Bibiano
  5. GyeongnamGoalHyeon-Oh KimAssist: Hyun-Seo Bae
  6. Ansan GreenersRed cardTae-Geon Kim
  7. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Chan-Dong LeeOff: Ki-Pyo Kwon
  8. GyeongnamGoalIl-Lok Yun
  9. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Ki-Jong WonOff: Il-Lok Yun
  10. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Dan ChoiOff: Dong-Hyun Kang
  11. Ansan GreenersYellow cardEung-Bin Yeon
  12. GyeongnamYellow cardHo-Jun Son
  13. GyeongnamGoalHyeon-Oh KimAssist: Chan-Dong Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Gyeongnam's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss against Ansan Greeners. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Ansan Greeners
1 : 1
Gyeongnam
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
1 : 0
Gyeongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 5:0 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gyeongnam and Ansan Greeners?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gyeongnam won 1, Ansan Greeners won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

Gyeongnam score 1.25 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 1.06. The K League 2 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Gyeongnam's matches and 69% of Ansan Greeners's.

What form are Gyeongnam and Ansan Greeners in?

Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.