South Korea - K League 2Data current as of September 13, 2026

Gyeongnam vs Busan I'Park: match statistics

Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam
1 : 2half-time 1:2
Busan I'Park crest
Busan I'Park

Gyeongnam vs Busan I'Park: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Gyeongnam played against Busan I'Park in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Gyeongnam has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Busan I'Park has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Gyeongnam scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.60. Busan I'Park scores 2.40 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.86 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Gyeongnam's games and 100% of Busan I'Park's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 80%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Busan I'Park has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 0.99 per game. Gyeongnam takes 8.8 shots per game, while Busan I'Park takes 14.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Gyeongnam leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Busan I'Park leads at halftime in 60% and scores 1.60 after halftime.

When the teams score

Gyeongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Busan I'Park, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.86 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I project an away win for Busan I'Park. Busan sit 2nd with a record of 4 wins and 1 draw (0 losses) this season, while Gyeongnam are 13th with 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses. Offensively Busan average 2.67 goals on the road (12 goals) with 17.33 shots and 6 on target, whereas the home side score 1.33 goals at home with 7.33 shots and 2.67 on target. The gap is reinforced by quality-of-chance metrics: Busan’s average xG is 1.88 versus 0.82 for Gyeongnam, and the hosts concede 2.0 goals per home match versus 1.33 conceded by Busan away. Considering the superiority in shot volume, higher xG and better form (Busan 2.6 points per match in the last 5 vs 1.0 for Gyeongnam), I assign a 65% probability to an away win, 20% to a draw and 15% to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes is that both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 100%, with Busan I'Park also at 100% in the last 5 matches and Gyeongnam at 60% — clear evidence matches involving these sides routinely see goals from both teams. Goal figures reinforce this: Gyeongnam averages 2.00 goals scored and concedes 1.00 per match (3.00 total), while Busan averages 2.67 scored and concedes 1.33 (4.00 total), both above the league average of 2.83 goals per game. xG data indicates both teams create genuine chances: Gyeongnam xG 1.15 vs xG against 1.27, Busan xG 1.88 vs xG against 1.57 — both sides generate and allow over 1.1 xG per match. Additionally, Busan averages 17.33 shots and 6.0 on target versus Gyeongnam’s 9.5 and 3.5, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, further increasing the likelihood of goals from both teams. Based on these concrete numbers I estimate BTTS - Yes probability at 92% and No Goal at 8%, therefore recommendation: yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams show strong attacking output: Gyeongnam scores on average 2.0 goals per game and Busan I'Park 2.67; both sides have 100% of matches with Both Teams To Score (BTTS 100%) and 100% of matches over 1.5 goals this season. Calculating expected goals as the average of the team’s attack and the opponent’s defense yields 1.36 xG for Gyeongnam (1.15 attack vs 1.57 opponent defense) and 1.57 xG for Busan (1.88 vs 1.27), giving a combined 2.93 expected goals. Busan averages 17.33 shots and 6.0 shots on target per game and has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals, while Gyeongnam averages 9.5 shots with 3.5 on target and higher finishing rate (21% vs 15%), and Gyeongnam has 50% of matches >2.5; together this increases the likelihood of at least 2–3 goals. Given these data, the strongest signal is an Over 1.5 bet (both teams 100% of matches >1.5 and 2.93 expected goals), therefore I recommend playing the over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics indicate an advantage for Busan I'Park: their average xG is 1.88 versus Gyeongnam's 1.15, and average shots are 17.33 compared to 9.5, suggesting more scoring opportunities for the visitors. Form confirms this practically — in the last 5 matches Busan won 80% of games while Gyeongnam has only 20% wins; seasonally winPercentage_away=100.0 further underscores the visitors' dominance. Busan led at the break in 60% of their last 5 matches (last5_leadingAtHTPercentage_overall_away=60.0) versus 20% for the hosts (last5_leadingAtHTPercentage_overall_home=20.0), so HT favors the away side. The second half is decisive — average second-half goals are 3.0 for Busan (AVG_2hg_away=3.0) versus 1.5 for Gyeongnam, and in minutes 76–90 the visitors scored 5 goals compared to 1 for the hosts, suggesting they settle matches after the break. For these reasons the most likely scenario is Busan leading at half-time and winning at full-time (2/2, 38%), with alternatives of draw/away win (X/2, 18%) or draw/draw (X/X, 8%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
12Shots6
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
4Shots on target2
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
1.5xG0.89
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
3Corners4
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
63Dangerous attacks50
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
12Fouls11
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
1Cards1
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

GyeongnamBusan I'Park
1Goals scored / game2.4
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
1.6Goals allowed / game1.2
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
46%Average possession46%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
2.4Shots on target / game5
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.8Shots per game14.2
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
2.4Shots on target5
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
11.4%Shot conversion16.9%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
46%Possession46%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0.99xG for1.58
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
1.29xG against1.44
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

Shooting quality

Gyeongnam: BalancedBusan I'Park: Counter-attacking
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
Accuracy (shots on target)27%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Busan I'Park is 160% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 2.6 pts / game - Busan I'Park

Gyeongnam
LLDWD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Busan I'Park
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
80% W20% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 away
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Busan I'Park is 140% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 2.4 goals / game - Busan I'Park

Busan I'Park is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.6 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1.2 goals / game - Busan I'Park

Gyeongnam scoring profile: very strong

Gyeongnam scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Busan I'Park keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).

Busan I'Park scoring profile: very strong

Busan I'Park scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)12
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
8Goals conceded (season)6
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
2.6Average goals per game3.6
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
5Goals scored (last 5)12
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
20%2 goals80%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0%3 goals60%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0%4 goals0%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
40%2 goals20%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
20%3 goals0%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
20%4 goals0%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0%BTTS in both halves0%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
20%Scored in both halves60%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
60%BTTS - last 5100%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time60%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Busan I'Park is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 2 pts / game - Busan I'Park

Gyeongnam - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Busan I'Park - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)2
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.8
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
1.2Average goals (1st half)1.2
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
40%Clean sheet before half-time60%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
60%No goal before half-time20%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)2.2
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.6
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
1.4Average goals (2nd half)2.4
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
60%Clean sheet after half-time20%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park
40%No goal after half-time20%
GyeongnamBusan I'Park

Gyeongnam - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Busan I'Park - second-half results

60% W40% D0% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Gyeongnam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Busan I'Park - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.20
Goals scored / game0.81.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.22.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Busan I'Park
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
80%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Busan I'Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.82
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
166%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

GyeongnamLigaBusan I'Park
Average goals per game 2.602.86 3.60
Both teams scored 60%62% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%60% 80%
Clean sheets 20%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 80%86% 100%
Goal after half-time 60%69% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.45
Away goals / game
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Busan I'ParkYellow cardHo-Ik Jang
  2. GyeongnamGoalHo-Jun SonAssist: Ki-Jong Won
  3. Busan I'ParkGoalHwi SonAssist: Ju-Sung Woo
  4. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Jun-Ho KimOff: Ha-Min Kim
  5. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Hyun-Min KimOff: Min-Hyeok Kim
  6. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Hyeong-Won KimOff: Gyu-Baeg Lee
  7. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Oh KimOff: Chigozie Emmanuel Mbah
  8. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Ga-On BaekOff: Gabriel Honorio Ramos
  9. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Chan KimOff: Cristian Renato Gonçalves Riquelme
  10. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Se-Hoon KimOff: Jun-Seok Son
  11. GyeongnamYellow cardJung-Won Choi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Gyeongnam's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Busan I'Park. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Busan I'Park
1 : 1
Gyeongnam FC
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 0
Busan I'Park
Busan I'Park
0 : 1
Gyeongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Busan I'Park?

The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 1:2 Busan I'Park. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gyeongnam and Busan I'Park?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Gyeongnam won 2, Busan I'Park won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Busan I'Park?

Gyeongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Busan I'Park 2.40. The K League 2 average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Gyeongnam's matches and 100% of Busan I'Park's.

What form are Gyeongnam and Busan I'Park in?

Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Busan I'Park 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Busan I'Park?

The statistical background for Gyeongnam vs Busan I'Park — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.