South Korea - K League 2Changwon Football CenterData current as of September 01, 2026

Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen: match statistics

Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen

Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Gyeongnam played against Paju Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Changwon Football Center. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Gyeongnam has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Paju Citizen has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Gyeongnam scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 1.36. Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 68% of Gyeongnam's games and 50% of Paju Citizen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 45%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Gyeongnam has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.27 per game. Gyeongnam takes 11.6 shots per game, while Paju Citizen takes 10.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Gyeongnam leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. Paju Citizen leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.55 after halftime.

When the teams score

Gyeongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Paju Citizen, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gyeongnam possess a clear attacking edge at home, averaging 1.73 goals from 1.43 xG, while Paju Citizen score only 1.09 goals per away match. The hosts also create more chances, registering 12.45 shots and 4 shots on target per game, compared with the visitors’ 10 shots and 3.55 shots on target. Paju’s defense allows opponents high-quality opportunities, with an average xG against of 1.85, although they concede just 1.27 goals per match. However, Gyeongnam are winless in their last five matches, drawing four of them and scoring only 4 goals during that period, which significantly increases the likelihood of a draw. Despite Paju’s stronger recent run, with 2 wins in 5 matches, the hosts’ advantage in chance creation and home-field edge point towards a narrow Gyeongnam victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Gyeongnam’s seasonal BTTS rate is only 36%, clearly below Paju Citizen’s 64% and the league-wide figure of 63%. The hosts failed to score in 55% of their matches, and with an average of just 0.91 goals per game, their attack is the main risk to a both-teams-to-score scenario. Paju keep a clean sheet in 27% of matches, compared with just 18% for Gyeongnam, giving the visitors a realistic chance of keeping their opponents scoreless. The last five matches suggest some improvement in the hosts’ BTTS rate, rising to 80%, but they still scored only 0.8 goals per game, while the two teams recorded modest average figures of 0.8 and 1.0 goals respectively. Therefore, the BTTS - No outcome is slightly more likely, meaning that at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The seasonal profile of both teams points to a limited number of goals: Gyeongnam score an average of 0.91 goals, while Paju Citizen score 1.09 goals per match. The Under 3.5 goals line has been covered in 73% of the hosts’ matches and as many as 82% of the visitors’ games, while neither team averages even 1.1 goals per match. Gyeongnam have scored 4 goals in their last 5 matches and have not played a single game featuring at least 3 goals, further supporting a cautious scenario. Although the average xG figures suggest some goal potential—1.20 for the hosts and 1.33 for the visitors—the projected total of 2.25 goals remains well below the 3.5-goal threshold. Under 3.5 goals is therefore the strongest option, as the seasonal data and current finishing form clearly limit the risk of four goals being scored.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: both teams were level after 45 minutes in 7 of 11 matches, or 64% of cases, while over their last five games this figure rose to 80% for both sides. Gyeongnam average just 0.45 goals before the break, with Paju recording the same figure; notably, the visitors have scored only one first-half goal across their last five appearances. The hosts have a slightly stronger pre-break defensive record, conceding 0.27 goals compared with Paju’s 0.45, which further supports a cautious opening. After the interval, Paju’s advantage is not pronounced enough to clearly favor their victory, as Gyeongnam have drawn 80% of their last five matches, compared with 20% for Paju. The X/X scenario is therefore the most likely, although the hosts’ higher average xG against the opposition defense—1.20 versus 1.85—leaves a realistic chance of a late turnaround in Gyeongnam’s favor.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
12Shots17
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
4Shots on target5
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
1.52xG1.98
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
5Corners3
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
67Dangerous attacks77
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
13Fouls10
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
3Cards1
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

GyeongnamPaju Citizen
1.32Goals scored / game1
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
1.36Goals allowed / game1.23
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
50%Average possession43%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
3.68Shots on target / game3.64
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.59Shots per game10.09
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
3.68Shots on target3.64
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
11.4%Shot conversion9.9%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
50%Possession43%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
1.37xG for1.27
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
1.37xG against1.56
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

Shooting quality

Gyeongnam: BalancedPaju Citizen: Balanced
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Paju Citizen is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 1.4 pts / game - Paju Citizen

Gyeongnam
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
27% W41% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-7
1.23 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 0%
Paju Citizen
LWLWD
Season result split
32% W18% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-11
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gyeongnam is 32% better for: goals scored per game.

1.32 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1 goals / game - Paju Citizen

Paju Citizen is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.36 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1.23 goals / game - Paju Citizen

Gyeongnam scoring profile: very strong

Gyeongnam scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 meczów).

Paju Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Paju Citizen scores in 59% of games (13 of 22 meczów), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 meczów).

29Goals scored (season)22
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
30Goals conceded (season)27
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
2.68Average goals per game2.23
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
4Goals scored (last 5)5
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal59%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
32%2 goals36%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
14%3 goals5%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
5%4 goals0%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal77%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
36%2 goals23%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
5%3 goals18%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
5%4 goals5%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time23%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves5%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
23%Scored in both halves18%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
80%BTTS - last 560%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time45%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paju Citizen is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 1.32 pts / game - Paju Citizen

Gyeongnam - half-time state
14% leading55% draw32% trailing
Paju Citizen - half-time state
23% leading64% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per game (1st half)1.32
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.45
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
1.23Average goals (1st half)0.82
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
50%Clean sheet before half-time68%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
55%No goal before half-time64%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per game (2nd half)1
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.41
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
50%Clean sheet after half-time36%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen
45%No goal after half-time59%
GyeongnamPaju Citizen

Gyeongnam - second-half results

27% W45% R27% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding193%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Paju Citizen - second-half results

23% W32% R45% P
29
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Gyeongnam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Paju Citizen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.21.8
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
6
9
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+104%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

GyeongnamLigaPaju Citizen
Average goals per game 2.682.72 2.23
Both teams scored 68%62% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%53% 45%
Clean sheets 9%23% 23%
Goal before half-time 64%69% 45%
Goal after half-time 73%78% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / game
1.31
Away goals / game
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Hyun-Seo BaeOff: Sang-Jun Cho
  2. Paju CitizenYellow cardJulián Andres Bonilla Tovar
  3. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Chan-ho LeeOff: Jung-Woon Hong
  4. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Byung JeonOff: Julián Andres Bonilla Tovar
  5. GyeongnamYellow cardJin-Hyuk Cho
  6. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Hyun-Tae KimOff: Beom-Kyung Choi
  7. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Aleksa KaradžićOff: Hyeong-Won Kim
  8. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Chan-Dong LeeOff: Ha-Min Kim
  9. GyeongnamYellow cardJeong-Hyun Kim
  10. GyeongnamYellow cardLucas Gabriel da Silva Teodoro

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Gyeongnam's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Paju Citizen. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 1:0 Paju Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen?

Gyeongnam score 1.32 goals per game on average and Paju Citizen 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Gyeongnam's matches and 50% of Paju Citizen's.

What form are Gyeongnam and Paju Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Paju Citizen 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen?

The statistical background for Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.