Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen: match statistics
Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gyeongnam played against Paju Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Changwon Football Center. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Gyeongnam has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Paju Citizen has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Gyeongnam scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 1.36. Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 68% of Gyeongnam's games and 50% of Paju Citizen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 45%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gyeongnam has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.27 per game. Gyeongnam takes 11.6 shots per game, while Paju Citizen takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Gyeongnam leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. Paju Citizen leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gyeongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Paju Citizen, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gyeongnam possess a clear attacking edge at home, averaging 1.73 goals from 1.43 xG, while Paju Citizen score only 1.09 goals per away match. The hosts also create more chances, registering 12.45 shots and 4 shots on target per game, compared with the visitors’ 10 shots and 3.55 shots on target. Paju’s defense allows opponents high-quality opportunities, with an average xG against of 1.85, although they concede just 1.27 goals per match. However, Gyeongnam are winless in their last five matches, drawing four of them and scoring only 4 goals during that period, which significantly increases the likelihood of a draw. Despite Paju’s stronger recent run, with 2 wins in 5 matches, the hosts’ advantage in chance creation and home-field edge point towards a narrow Gyeongnam victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Gyeongnam’s seasonal BTTS rate is only 36%, clearly below Paju Citizen’s 64% and the league-wide figure of 63%. The hosts failed to score in 55% of their matches, and with an average of just 0.91 goals per game, their attack is the main risk to a both-teams-to-score scenario. Paju keep a clean sheet in 27% of matches, compared with just 18% for Gyeongnam, giving the visitors a realistic chance of keeping their opponents scoreless. The last five matches suggest some improvement in the hosts’ BTTS rate, rising to 80%, but they still scored only 0.8 goals per game, while the two teams recorded modest average figures of 0.8 and 1.0 goals respectively. Therefore, the BTTS - No outcome is slightly more likely, meaning that at least one team is expected not to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The seasonal profile of both teams points to a limited number of goals: Gyeongnam score an average of 0.91 goals, while Paju Citizen score 1.09 goals per match. The Under 3.5 goals line has been covered in 73% of the hosts’ matches and as many as 82% of the visitors’ games, while neither team averages even 1.1 goals per match. Gyeongnam have scored 4 goals in their last 5 matches and have not played a single game featuring at least 3 goals, further supporting a cautious scenario. Although the average xG figures suggest some goal potential—1.20 for the hosts and 1.33 for the visitors—the projected total of 2.25 goals remains well below the 3.5-goal threshold. Under 3.5 goals is therefore the strongest option, as the seasonal data and current finishing form clearly limit the risk of four goals being scored.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: both teams were level after 45 minutes in 7 of 11 matches, or 64% of cases, while over their last five games this figure rose to 80% for both sides. Gyeongnam average just 0.45 goals before the break, with Paju recording the same figure; notably, the visitors have scored only one first-half goal across their last five appearances. The hosts have a slightly stronger pre-break defensive record, conceding 0.27 goals compared with Paju’s 0.45, which further supports a cautious opening. After the interval, Paju’s advantage is not pronounced enough to clearly favor their victory, as Gyeongnam have drawn 80% of their last five matches, compared with 20% for Paju. The X/X scenario is therefore the most likely, although the hosts’ higher average xG against the opposition defense—1.20 versus 1.85—leaves a realistic chance of a late turnaround in Gyeongnam’s favor.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gyeongnam | Paju Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Paju Citizen is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 1.4 pts / game - Paju Citizen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gyeongnam is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.32 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1 goals / game - Paju Citizen
Paju Citizen is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.36 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1.23 goals / game - Paju Citizen
Gyeongnam scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 meczów).
Paju Citizen scores in 59% of games (13 of 22 meczów), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gyeongnam
Over / Under - Paju Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paju Citizen is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 1.32 pts / game - Paju Citizen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gyeongnam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Paju Citizen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gyeongnam
Paju Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Gyeongnam | Liga | Paju Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.68 | 2.72 | ▼ 2.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 53% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 23% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 69% | ▼ 45% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 78% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gyeongnam's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Paju Citizen. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 1:0 Paju Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen?
Gyeongnam score 1.32 goals per game on average and Paju Citizen 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Gyeongnam's matches and 50% of Paju Citizen's.
What form are Gyeongnam and Paju Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Paju Citizen 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen?
The statistical background for Gyeongnam vs Paju Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


