Hødd vs Egersund: match statistics
Hødd vs Egersund: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Hødd played against Egersund in First Division (Norway). The game was played on May 25, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Hødd has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Egersund has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Hødd scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.38. Egersund scores 1.50 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Hødd's games and 38% of Egersund's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 63%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Egersund has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.29 per game. Hødd takes 10.0 shots per game, while Egersund takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Hødd leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Egersund leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Hødd's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Egersund, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.56 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1): Hødd has clearly better form over the last 5 matches, scoring 8 goals and averaging 1.6 points per game, while Egersund scored 5 goals and averages 0.8 points per game. In home matches Hødd averages 1.25 goals scored and concedes 1.25 goals per game, whereas Egersund away averages 2.0 goals scored and concedes 2.0, which suggests Hødd’s defense is numerically more stable (1.25 conceded vs 2.0 conceded). The visitors, however, post better quality metrics: away xG for Egersund is 1.46 versus 1.25 xG for the home side, and the visitors’ shot conversion rate is 18% versus 13% for Hødd, with high possession 63% vs 50%. Hødd averages 4.75 shots on target at home from 9.5 total shots and has 25% of home matches without scoring, while Egersund averages 11.33 shots away and their percentage of away matches without a goal is 0% (they always score). Considering Hødd’s superior recent run (2 wins in 5 vs 1 for Egersund), lower average goals conceded at home and balanced xG, I give Hødd the edge: 55% home win, 25% draw, 20% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis shows mixed signals: Hødd at home has only 20% BTTS seasonally and keeps a clean sheet in 60% of matches, while Egersund away averages 2.0 goals and has a seasonal BTTS of 67% and 100% of matches over 2.5 goals. xG metrics indicate both teams create chances — Hødd has xG 1.57 versus Egersund’s away conceded xG 1.29, and Egersund has xG 1.46 versus Hødd’s conceded xG 1.21 — which implies real scoring opportunities from both sides. Additionally, Hødd’s last 5 matches show BTTS at 80% and they concede on average 1.4 goals, while Egersund’s last 5 show BTTS 60% and concede on average 1.6 goals, pointing to an open game. Considering Egersund’s higher efficiency (conversion 18% vs Hødd 9%) and a possible regression for Hødd toward xG levels (xG against 1.21 vs actual seasonal 0.4 conceded), the scenario of both teams scoring is more likely. Therefore I assign 65% probability to BTTS=Yes and 35% to BTTS=No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects about 1.43 goals for Hødd (xG_for 1.57 vs Egersund xG_against 1.29) and 1.34 goals for Egersund (xG_for 1.46 vs Hødd xG_against 1.21), totaling ~2.77 expected goals. From a Poisson distribution with mean 2.77 I calculate ~76% probability for Over 1.5 goals, ~52% for Over 2.5 goals and ~30% for Over 3.5 goals. Supporting the Over markets are league and team data: Egersund has 100% of matches this season over 1.5 and over 2.5, and the league averages 3.56 goals per game with 71% of fixtures >2.5, which boosts scoring likelihood. Offsetting this is Hødd’s solid home defense — 60% clean sheets and only 20% BTTS for the home side — therefore I recommend the safer bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal from the available data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hødd led at half-time in 3 of 5 home matches (60%) and averages 1.0 goals by the break with 0.0 conceded, providing a clear home advantage at Half-Time. Over the full match Hødd win 60% of home games, average 1.2 goals scored and 0.4 conceded per game, while Egersund lose on the road 67% of the time and concede an average of 2.0 goals, so holding the lead is realistic. The risk comes in the second half — Egersund average 1.33 goals after the break and in 67% of their away matches both teams score, so a post-break equalizer is a real possibility. Considering Hødd’s 60% HT leads, 100% clean sheets for the home side at half-time, and Hødd’s superior home xG (1.57 vs 1.29 xG against Egersund), the strongest signal is 1/1 and I assign it approximately a 42% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Hødd | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Hødd is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Hødd · 0.8 pts / game - Egersund
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Egersund is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Hødd · 1.5 goals / game - Egersund
Egersund is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.38 goals / game - Hødd · 1 goals / game - Egersund
Hødd scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 meczów).
Egersund scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while Hødd keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hødd
Over / Under - Egersund
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egersund is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Hødd · 1.75 pts / game - Egersund
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hødd - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Egersund - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Hødd
Egersund
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Hødd | Liga | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.63 | 3.56 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 57% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 71% | ▼ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 22% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 79% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 86% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Hødd's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Egersund. Games average 0.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Hødd vs Egersund?
The First Division match finished Hødd 3:1 Egersund. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hødd and Egersund?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Hødd won 1, Egersund won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hødd vs Egersund?
Hødd score 1.25 goals per game on average and Egersund 1.50. The First Division average is 3.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Hødd's matches and 38% of Egersund's.
What form are Hødd and Egersund in?
Over the last 5 games Hødd have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Egersund 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hødd vs Egersund?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Hødd vs Egersund: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


