Hødd vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Hødd vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Hødd played against Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The game was played on June 14, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Hødd has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Hødd scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 1.30. Kongsvinger scores 2.30 and allows 1.10. Games in this league average 3.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Hødd's games and 70% of Kongsvinger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 80%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.79 to 1.24 per game. Hødd takes 9.9 shots per game, while Kongsvinger takes 15.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Hødd leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Hødd's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Kongsvinger, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.55 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger is the favorite: they sit 2nd and have 7 wins this season versus Hødd's 4, while the visitors have scored 23 goals this season compared to the hosts' 13. In the last 5 matches Kongsvinger have scored 11 goals and averaged 2.0 points per game, whereas Hødd scored 9 goals and have 1.4 points per game, indicating better form for the visitors. The visitors create significantly more chances — on average 15 shots and 5.2 on target per match with an average xG of 1.66, versus 10.4 shots, 4.6 on target and xG 1.28 for Hødd — this argues for Kongsvinger’s offensive superiority. Hødd, however, have higher efficiency (shot conversion 15% vs 12% for Kongsvinger) and a good home run (60% wins), but a higher average xG against (1.65) and 8 goals conceded in the last 5 matches weaken their chances. Considering the advantage in chance creation, higher xG and better recent results, I predict a victory for the visitors, with a moderate chance of a draw or a home upset.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Hødd at home has a seasonal BTTS rate of 80%, scores on average 2.8 goals per game and has 0% matches without a goal, which strongly supports goals from the hosts. Kongsvinger away has BTTS 60%, averages 1.8 goals in the season (2.2 in the last 5 matches) and generates xG 1.82 in the last five games, meaning the visitors regularly create scoring chances. Hødd concedes on average 1.0 goals at home in the season (1.6 in the last 5), while Kongsvinger concedes 1.2 goals seasonally, and the xG comparison (seasonal xG_for 1.93 for Hødd vs 1.66 for Kongsvinger and last5 xG_for 1.38 vs 1.82) indicates realistic scoring chances for both teams. Additionally Hødd records 6.0 shots on target on average at home versus 5.2 shots on target for Kongsvinger away, and the percentage of matches over 2.5 goals for Hødd is 100% (combination of over2.5 and BTTS for hosts 80%), which strengthens the both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering 80% vs 60% BTTS, the high xG 1.93 for Hødd and solid xG 1.66/1.82 for Kongsvinger as well as average goals 2.8 vs 1.8, I assess the probability of BTTS at 75% versus 25% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Averaging the teams' offensive and defensive xG, I expect 1.74 goals for Hødd (offensive xG 1.93 vs Kongsvinger defensive xG 1.54) and 1.47 for Kongsvinger (offensive xG 1.66 vs Hødd defensive xG 1.28), giving a total of 3.21 expected goals. Season metrics show Hødd have 100% of home matches Over 2.5, Kongsvinger 60% Away Over 2.5, and the league average Over 2.5 is 71% — strong support for Over 2.5. Hødd average 16.4 shots and 6.0 on target with a 17% conversion, while Kongsvinger concede xG 1.54, so the home side has a real advantage in creating and converting chances. Additionally both teams register high BTTS rates: Hødd 80% and Kongsvinger 60%, increasing the likelihood both teams score and that at least 3 goals occur. Based on this, the optimal line to play is Over 2.5 (pick: over); I estimate its probability at approximately 72% as a compromise between the historical 100%/60% figures and the xG model (3.21).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I assess the most likely scenario is 1/1 (Hødd leading at the break and winning the match). Hødd have a 100% home win rate and average 3.0 points per home match this season versus Kongsvinger’s 1.6 away points, giving a clear home advantage. xG favors Hødd (1.93 vs 1.66), and the hosts average 6.0 shots on target against the visitors’ 5.2 with superior conversion (17% vs 12%). Hødd are also strong after the break: an average of 2.4 goals scored in second halves and an 80% win rate in second halves, while Kongsvinger average 0.6 goals after the break. In the last five matches Hødd led at the break in 60% of games and averaged 1.0 goals by half-time versus Kongsvinger’s 0.6, so I assign the 1/1 HT/FT scenario the highest probability at 38%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Hødd | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kongsvinger is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Hødd · 2 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 77% better for: goals scored per game.
1.3 goals / game - Hødd · 2.3 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.3 goals / game - Hødd · 1.1 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Hødd scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).
Kongsvinger scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 meczów), while Hødd keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hødd
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.6 pts / game - Hødd · 1.7 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hødd - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 70%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Hødd
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Hødd | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.60 | 3.55 | ▼ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 79% | ▲ 90% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 88% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Hødd's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Kongsvinger. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Hødd vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Hødd 1:2 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hødd and Kongsvinger?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Hødd won 0, Kongsvinger won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hødd vs Kongsvinger?
Hødd score 1.30 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.30. The First Division average is 3.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Hødd's matches and 70% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Hødd and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Hødd have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hødd vs Kongsvinger?
The statistical background for Hødd vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.