Haka vs EIF: match statistics
Haka vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Haka played against EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 8, 2026. Final score: 4:3.
Recent form
Haka has 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.25 points per game. EIF has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Haka scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 0.75. EIF scores 2.00 and allows 2.40. Games in this league average 2.24 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Haka's games and 80% of EIF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 100%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Haka has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.49 per game. Haka takes 13.0 shots per game, while EIF takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Haka leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. EIF leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Haka's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For EIF, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.24 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haka has a clear home advantage: averaging 3.5 goals scored per home match with xG 2.02 and 16.5 shots (7.5 on target), while EIF away averages 1.0 goal with xG 1.69 and 12 shots (5.5 on target). Haka’s conversion rate is markedly higher — 21% versus EIF’s 8% — and the hosts have no home matches without a goal (0% scoreless games), whereas the visitors failed to score in 50% of their away fixtures. Defensively the visitors look weak away: conceding 3.5 goals per match with xG against 1.49, while Haka at home concedes only 1.0 goal and has 50% clean sheets (xG against 1.23). Form supports the home advantage — Haka won 3 of the last 5 and averages 2.0 points per match in that period, EIF has 2 wins in the last 5 and 1.2 points on average, and the visitors lost all their away games (100% away defeats). Considering the higher shot volume, superior efficiency (21% vs 8%) and EIF’s much weaker away defense, I forecast a Haka victory; I estimate probabilities around 70% for the hosts, 18% for a draw and 12% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Haka over the last 5 matches averages 3.4 goals scored and concedes only 0.6 goals (17 scored and 3 conceded), indicating strong offensive form and defensive stability. Although Haka’s seasonal BTTS rate at home is 100%, their last 5 matches have BTTS only at 20% (1 of 5), suggesting they have recently kept clean sheets more often. EIF away this season scores 1.0 goal per game, and in the last 5 matches has 1.8 goals and concedes 2.0 goals (9 scored, 10 conceded), however their shot conversion rate is a low 8%, meaning low efficiency from chances. Comparing these figures (Haka concedes 0.6 in last 5 vs EIF concedes 2.0; EIF conversion 8% vs Haka home conversion 26%) favors a scenario where EIF will struggle to score effectively against Haka’s form. Therefore I recommend the 'No' (No Goal / clean sheet expected) as the stronger signal: 'No' 70% vs 'Yes' 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on average xG from the last 5 matches I project 1.81 goals for Haka and 1.26 for EIF (total 3.07): Haka have an attacking xG of 2.07 while EIF concede xG of 1.55; EIF’s attacking xG is 1.33 and Haka concede xG of 1.19. This season Haka score on average 2.67 goals at home, and EIF concede 3.5 goals away, which further increases the expectation for goals from both sides. Seasonal metrics show both teams frequently play high-scoring games: Over 2.5 is 100% for Haka and 100% for EIF in available stats, and in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 is 80% for the hosts and 100% for the visitors. Additionally, Haka’s high finishing efficiency (conversion rate 26% vs. EIF 8%) suggests the hosts can convert chances to goals more effectively. I recommend Over 2.5 as the optimal line (over) – the model and seasonal indicators give a strong signal (estimated probability of Over 2.5 ≈ 80%); Over 1.5 is virtually certain (~96%), while Over 3.5 remains more risky (~45%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics clearly favor Haka: the hosts won 67% of matches and average 2.0 points per game versus 0.0 for EIF, and they led at the break in 67% of home fixtures. Haka scores on average 1.0 goal by half-time and concedes only 0.33, while EIF concedes 2.0 goals by half-time and were losing at the break in 100% of away matches, which strongly indicates the hosts will have the lead at the break. Although EIF’s xG is 1.69 compared to Haka’s 1.35, the visitors have a very low shot conversion rate of 8% versus Haka’s 26%, meaning created chances rarely become goals. Additionally, Haka averages 10.33 shots with 6.0 on target, and EIF 12.0 with 5.5 on target, so with Haka’s significantly better conversion the most likely scenario is a lead at half-time and a home win (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Haka | EIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - Haka · 2 goals / game - EIF
Haka is 220% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.75 goals / game - Haka · 2.4 goals / game - EIF
Haka scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).
EIF scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haka
Over / Under - EIF
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
EIF is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Haka · 1.4 pts / game - EIF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
EIF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 75% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Haka
EIF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| Haka | Liga | EIF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.50 | 2.24 | ▲ 4.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 36% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 40% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 64% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Haka vs EIF?
The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 4:3 EIF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs EIF?
Haka score 1.75 goals per game on average and EIF 2.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Haka's matches and 80% of EIF's.
What form are Haka and EIF in?
Over the last 5 games Haka have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and EIF 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs EIF?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs EIF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.