Finland - YkkösliigaTehtaan kenttäData current as of 22 July 2026

Haka vs JäPS: match statistics

Haka crest
Haka
1 : 2half-time 1:2
JäPS crest
JäPS

Haka vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haka play JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 5 June 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Haka: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. JäPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haka scores 1.73 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.93 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haka 53%, JäPS 27%. Over 2.5: Haka 53%, JäPS 47%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Haka has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.21. Haka: 12.0 shots per match, JäPS: 9.5.

Match halves

Haka: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.27. JäPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Haka: 76-90+ (8 goals). JäPS: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the home win (Haka). Haka averages 2.8 goals per home match and has scored 8 goals in the last 5 games, while JäPS averages only 0.75 goals away and has 4 goals in their last 5. Haka generates 1.62 xG at home on average and records 5.8 shots on target from 12.8 attempts with 56% possession, whereas JäPS has 1.24 away xG, 3.75 shots on target and 44% possession; Haka’s conversion rate is 22% versus JäPS’s 7%. The visitors fail to score in 50% of away matches and concede 1.75 goals on average away, while Haka concedes 1.4 at home and has 0% of matches without scoring, which further favors the hosts. Although Haka has a 40% draw rate at home, better recent form (3 wins in the last 5 and 2.0 points per game versus JäPS’s 1 win and 0.6 points) and superiority in chance quality and efficiency make a Haka victory the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

71Possession (%)29
HakaJäPS
17Shots10
HakaJäPS
5Shots on target4
HakaJäPS
2.09xG1.19
HakaJäPS
9Corners2
HakaJäPS
93Dangerous attacks39
HakaJäPS
12Fouls19
HakaJäPS
4Cards4
HakaJäPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.73Goals scored / match0.93
HakaJäPS
1.13Goals conceded / match1.53
HakaJäPS
58%Average possession44%
HakaJäPS
4.73Shots on target / match3.47
HakaJäPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match9.53
HakaJäPS
4.73Shots on target3.47
HakaJäPS
14.4%Shot conversion9.8%
HakaJäPS
58%Possession44%
HakaJäPS
1.59xG for1.21
HakaJäPS
1.18xG against1.61
HakaJäPS

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingJäPS: Balanced
HakaJäPS
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haka is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Haka · 1.2 pts / match - JäPS

Haka
WLLWD
Season result split
47% W27% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-4
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
JäPS
LLWLW
Season result split
47% W7% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-7
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

1.73 goals / match - Haka · 0.93 goals / match - JäPS

Haka is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Haka · 1.53 goals / match - JäPS

Haka scoring profile: strong

Haka scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

JäPS scoring profile: strong

JäPS scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

26Goals scored (season)14
HakaJäPS
17Goals conceded (season)23
HakaJäPS
2.87Average goals in match2.47
HakaJäPS
8Goals scored (last 5)4
HakaJäPS
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
HakaJäPS

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal67%
HakaJäPS
53%2 goals20%
HakaJäPS
20%3 goals7%
HakaJäPS
13%4 goals0%
HakaJäPS

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal53%
HakaJäPS
40%2 goals40%
HakaJäPS
7%3 goals27%
HakaJäPS
0%4 goals20%
HakaJäPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
HakaJäPS
7%BTTS in both halves0%
HakaJäPS
33%Scored in both halves7%
HakaJäPS

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
HakaJäPS
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
HakaJäPS
60%BTTS - last 540%
HakaJäPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
HakaJäPS
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
HakaJäPS
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
HakaJäPS

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
HakaJäPS
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
HakaJäPS
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
HakaJäPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JäPS is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Haka · 1.47 pts / match - JäPS

Haka - half-time state
27% leading27% draw47% trailing
JäPS - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.47
HakaJäPS
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.53
HakaJäPS
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
HakaJäPS
1.13Average goals (1st half)0.87
HakaJäPS
47%Clean sheet before half-time67%
HakaJäPS
60%No goal before half-time60%
HakaJäPS

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.13
HakaJäPS
1.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
HakaJäPS
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
HakaJäPS
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.6
HakaJäPS
60%Clean sheet after half-time53%
HakaJäPS
27%No goal after half-time67%
HakaJäPS

Haka - second-half results

53% W40% R7% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JäPS - second-half results

27% W33% R40% P
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.9

Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
JäPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.42.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haka
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
7
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+87%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaJäPS
Average goals in match 2.872.47 2.47
Both teams scored 53%44% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%44% 47%
Clean sheets 33%31% 47%
Goal before half-time 73%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Haka 1 - 0 - 0 JäPS. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Haka vs JäPS?

The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 1:2 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs JäPS?

Haka score 1.73 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.93. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Haka's matches and 27% of JäPS's.

What form are Haka and JäPS in?

Over the last 5 games Haka have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and JäPS 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs JäPS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs JäPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.