Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of September 07, 2026

Haka vs KäPa: match statistics

Haka crest
Haka
2 : 2half-time 0:1
KäPa crest
KäPa

Haka vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Haka played against KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Haka has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. KäPa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.33 points per game.

Scoring records

Haka scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 0.00. KäPa scores 1.67 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 1.94 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of Haka's games and 67% of KäPa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 28% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Haka has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.07 per game. Haka takes 13.0 shots per game, while KäPa takes 7.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Haka leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 2.00 goals per game after halftime. KäPa leads at halftime in 100% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Haka's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For KäPa, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 1.94 goals. Both teams score in 28% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Haka at home shows strong offensive metrics and control of the game: on average 17 shots and 7 on target per match, conversion rate around 29% and an average of 5 goals per home match with xG 2.01. In the last 5 fixtures Haka scored 11 goals, are unbeaten (form last 5: W D D W W) and average 2.2 points per match in that period, while at home they maintain 100% wins and 100% clean sheets. KäPa as away team have less initiative: 8.5 shots and 3.5 on target per match, 41% possession, away xG 1.13 and on average 1.5 goals scored away, with 0.5 goals conceded on the road. Additionally KäPa conceded 7 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas Haka conceded 2 in the same period, indicating a home advantage in defense and chance finishing. Considering possession dominance (65% vs 41%), better efficiency (29% vs 18%) and higher xG for the hosts (2.01 vs 1.13), I predict a Haka victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - Yes is strong: Haka has a seasonal home BTTS rate of 100%, while KäPa has a seasonal BTTS of 50% and an 80% BTTS rate in the last 5 matches. In their last 5 fixtures Haka scored 11 goals (2.2 avg) and KäPa scored 9 goals (1.8 avg), indicating both sides regularly find the net. KäPa’s defense appears more vulnerable — they conceded 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 avg) versus Haka’s 2 conceded in the last 5 (0.4 avg), but Haka have no clean sheets at home this season (0%), so the hosts also concede frequently at home. Additionally, Haka generate an average xG of 1.95 over the last 5 matches compared to KäPa’s 1.10, and Haka’s finishing rate is 40% versus KäPa’s 18%, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring at least once. Based on Haka’s 100% home BTTS, KäPa’s 80% in-form BTTS and the goal outputs of 2.2 vs 1.8, I assess the probability of BTTS at 75% (Yes) and 25% (No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have been highly productive recently: in the last 5 matches Haka averaged 2.2 goals and KäPa 1.8 goals, yielding a combined average of 4.0 goals in their recent outings. Based on xG and giving greater weight to form (Haka 1.95 xG in the last 5 vs 0.96 seasonally; KäPa 1.10 in the last 5 and 1.13 seasonally), I estimated 1.50 expected goals for Haka and 1.11 for KäPa, totaling 2.61 expected goals. Over 2.5 stats support this view: Haka has 100% of matches over 2.5 this season and 60% in the last 5, KäPa has 80% over 2.5 in the last 5, and Haka has a season-long BTTS of 100%, which increases the probability of goals from both sides. Additionally, KäPa averages 8.5 shots (3.5 on target) per game, while Haka, despite fewer shots (5.0), has a very high conversion rate of 40% (vs 18% for KäPa), favoring real goals. Given these figures the strongest market to play is Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Analysis of the last 5 matches shows Haka scores an average of 2.2 goals and concedes 0.4 per game, while KäPa averages 1.8 scored and 1.4 conceded, giving Haka the advantage in the final outcome. KäPa more often takes the lead at the break — in 4 of the last 5 matches (80%) — while Haka led at half-time in 3 of 5 (60%), indicating KäPa’s activity in the first 45 minutes. The difference appears after the break: Haka scores on average 1.8 points after half-time versus 0.4 for KäPa and has a positive second-half goal balance of +6 compared to 0, so Haka tends to stage a turnaround. Additionally, KäPa generates higher xG (1.13 vs 0.96) and more shots (8.5 vs 5.0), but Haka has a much higher efficiency (conversion 40% vs 18%), which favors comebacks; therefore the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time outcome is KäPa leading at half-time and Haka winning after the break (2/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
HakaKäPa
16Shots11
HakaKäPa
8Shots on target5
HakaKäPa
2.02xG1.41
HakaKäPa
5Corners4
HakaKäPa
62Dangerous attacks51
HakaKäPa
11Fouls17
HakaKäPa
3Cards3
HakaKäPa

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.5Goals scored / game1.67
HakaKäPa
0Goals allowed / game1
HakaKäPa
66%Average possession45%
HakaKäPa
4.5Shots on target / game3
HakaKäPa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game7.33
HakaKäPa
4.5Shots on target3
HakaKäPa
19.2%Shot conversion22.7%
HakaKäPa
66%Possession45%
HakaKäPa
1.63xG for1.07
HakaKäPa
0.84xG against1.12
HakaKäPa

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingKäPa: Counter-attacking
HakaKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)35%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.56

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KäPa is 17% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Haka · 2.33 pts / game - KäPa

Haka
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
KäPa
WDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W33% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 50% better for: goals scored per game.

2.5 goals / game - Haka · 1.67 goals / game - KäPa

Haka scoring profile: mixed

Haka scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).

KäPa scoring profile: mixed

KäPa scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)5
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded (season)3
HakaKäPa
2.5Average goals per game2.67
HakaKäPa
5Goals scored (last 5)5
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded (last 5)3
HakaKäPa

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
HakaKäPa
50%2 goals67%
HakaKäPa
50%3 goals0%
HakaKäPa
50%4 goals0%
HakaKäPa

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal67%
HakaKäPa
0%2 goals33%
HakaKäPa
0%3 goals0%
HakaKäPa
0%4 goals0%
HakaKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
HakaKäPa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
HakaKäPa
50%Scored in both halves0%
HakaKäPa

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
HakaKäPa
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HakaKäPa
0%BTTS - last 567%
HakaKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
HakaKäPa
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
HakaKäPa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
HakaKäPa

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
HakaKäPa
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
HakaKäPa
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
HakaKäPa

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KäPa is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Haka · 3 pts / game - KäPa

Haka - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)3
HakaKäPa
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1.67
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
HakaKäPa
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.67
HakaKäPa
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
HakaKäPa
50%No goal before half-time0%
HakaKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)0.33
HakaKäPa
2Goals scored (2nd half)0
HakaKäPa
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
HakaKäPa
2Average goals (2nd half)1
HakaKäPa
100%Clean sheet after half-time33%
HakaKäPa
50%No goal after half-time100%
HakaKäPa

Haka - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KäPa - second-half results

0% W33% R67% P
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 67%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Haka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.00
Goals scored / game0.52.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.52.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
KäPa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.000.33
Goals scored / game1.70.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game1.71.0
1 goal100%67%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+5-3
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Haka
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
133%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.79
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.87
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
205%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
232%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaKäPa
Average goals per game 2.501.94 2.67
Both teams scored 0%28% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%39% 67%
Clean sheets 100%44% 33%
Goal before half-time 50%61% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%56% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.94
Average goals per game
28%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / game
0.72
Away goals / game
+69%
Home attack advantage
+41%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KäPaYellow cardDenis Cukici
  2. HakaSubstitutionOn: Tomas SoveliusOff: Niklas Friberg
  3. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Daniel RökmanOff: Niklas Leinonen
  4. HakaSubstitutionOn: Matias SyrjäläinenOff: Roni Pietsalo
  5. KäPaGoalSamba Sillah
  6. KäPaYellow cardAntonio Almen
  7. KäPaYellow cardDaniel Rökman
  8. HakaYellow cardJesper Karlsson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Haka vs KäPa?

The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 2:2 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs KäPa?

Haka score 2.50 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Haka's matches and 67% of KäPa's.

What form are Haka and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games Haka have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and KäPa 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs KäPa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs KäPa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.