Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Haka vs KäPa: match statistics

Haka crest
Haka
2 : 2half-time 0:1
KäPa crest
KäPa

Haka vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haka play KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Haka: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. KäPa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haka scores 1.73 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. KäPa scores 1.13 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haka 53%, KäPa 60%. Over 2.5: Haka 53%, KäPa 67%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Haka has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.40. Haka: 12.0 shots per match, KäPa: 11.3.

Match halves

Haka: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.27. KäPa: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Haka: 76-90+ (8 goals). KäPa: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Haka at home shows strong offensive metrics and control of the game: on average 17 shots and 7 on target per match, conversion rate around 29% and an average of 5 goals per home match with xG 2.01. In the last 5 fixtures Haka scored 11 goals, are unbeaten (form last 5: W D D W W) and average 2.2 points per match in that period, while at home they maintain 100% wins and 100% clean sheets. KäPa as away team have less initiative: 8.5 shots and 3.5 on target per match, 41% possession, away xG 1.13 and on average 1.5 goals scored away, with 0.5 goals conceded on the road. Additionally KäPa conceded 7 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas Haka conceded 2 in the same period, indicating a home advantage in defense and chance finishing. Considering possession dominance (65% vs 41%), better efficiency (29% vs 18%) and higher xG for the hosts (2.01 vs 1.13), I predict a Haka victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
HakaKäPa
16Shots11
HakaKäPa
8Shots on target5
HakaKäPa
2.02xG1.41
HakaKäPa
5Corners4
HakaKäPa
62Dangerous attacks51
HakaKäPa
11Fouls17
HakaKäPa
3Cards3
HakaKäPa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.73Goals scored / match1.13
HakaKäPa
1.13Goals conceded / match1.6
HakaKäPa
58%Average possession50%
HakaKäPa
4.73Shots on target / match3.67
HakaKäPa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match11.33
HakaKäPa
4.73Shots on target3.67
HakaKäPa
14.4%Shot conversion10%
HakaKäPa
58%Possession50%
HakaKäPa
1.59xG for1.4
HakaKäPa
1.18xG against1.58
HakaKäPa

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingKäPa: Balanced
HakaKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)39%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haka is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Haka · 0.8 pts / match - KäPa

Haka
WLLWD
Season result split
47% W27% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-4
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
KäPa
LWLDL
Season result split
27% W27% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-7
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.73 goals / match - Haka · 1.13 goals / match - KäPa

Haka is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Haka · 1.6 goals / match - KäPa

Haka scoring profile: very strong

Haka scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

KäPa scoring profile: strong

KäPa scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

26Goals scored (season)17
HakaKäPa
17Goals conceded (season)24
HakaKäPa
2.87Average goals in match2.73
HakaKäPa
8Goals scored (last 5)6
HakaKäPa
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
HakaKäPa

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal67%
HakaKäPa
53%2 goals40%
HakaKäPa
20%3 goals7%
HakaKäPa
13%4 goals0%
HakaKäPa

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal87%
HakaKäPa
40%2 goals60%
HakaKäPa
7%3 goals13%
HakaKäPa
0%4 goals0%
HakaKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
HakaKäPa
7%BTTS in both halves0%
HakaKäPa
33%Scored in both halves20%
HakaKäPa

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
HakaKäPa
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
HakaKäPa
60%BTTS - last 560%
HakaKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
HakaKäPa
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
HakaKäPa
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
HakaKäPa

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
HakaKäPa
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
HakaKäPa
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
HakaKäPa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KäPa is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Haka · 1.4 pts / match - KäPa

Haka - half-time state
27% leading27% draw47% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.4
HakaKäPa
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.6
HakaKäPa
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
HakaKäPa
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.27
HakaKäPa
47%Clean sheet before half-time60%
HakaKäPa
60%No goal before half-time53%
HakaKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)0.67
HakaKäPa
1.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
HakaKäPa
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
HakaKäPa
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.47
HakaKäPa
60%Clean sheet after half-time33%
HakaKäPa
27%No goal after half-time60%
HakaKäPa

Haka - second-half results

53% W40% R7% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - second-half results

7% W47% R47% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-6+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haka
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaKäPa
Average goals in match 2.872.47 2.73
Both teams scored 53%44% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%44% 67%
Clean sheets 33%31% 13%
Goal before half-time 73%60% 73%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Haka vs KäPa?

The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 2:2 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs KäPa?

Haka score 1.73 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.13. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Haka's matches and 60% of KäPa's.

What form are Haka and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games Haka have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and KäPa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs KäPa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs KäPa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.