Finland - YkkösliigaTehtaan kenttäData current as of October 21, 2026

Haka vs PK-35: match statistics

Haka crest
Haka
3 : 0half-time 0:0
PK-35 crest
PK-35

Haka vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Haka played against PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on October 9, 2026. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Haka has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. PK-35 has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Haka scores 1.88 goals per game and allows 1.16. PK-35 scores 1.64 and allows 0.72. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of Haka's games and 36% of PK-35's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 48%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Haka has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.42 per game. Haka takes 13.2 shots per game, while PK-35 takes 11.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Haka leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 1.08 goals per game after halftime. PK-35 leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.92 after halftime.

When the teams score

Haka's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For PK-35, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PK-35 hold a slight edge heading into this match: they have won 75% of their away games, while Haka have won 62% of their home fixtures. The visitors’ defense is their main strength — they concede just 0.17 goals per away game on average and keep a clean sheet in 83% of matches, while Haka concede an average of 1.15 goals at home. However, the hosts pose a greater attacking threat: their home xG is 1.72 compared with PK-35’s 1.41 away from home, and their average goals scored stand at 2.15 and 1.83 respectively. The last five matches also favor the visitors, who have recorded 2 wins and conceded 4 goals, while Haka have won once and conceded 9. The hosts’ potent attack could keep the contest close, but PK-35’s away form and tighter defense point towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest evidence against both teams scoring is PK-35’s record: the visitors have kept a clean sheet in 83% of matches, concede an average of just 0.17 goals, and their games have seen both teams score in only 8% of cases. In their last 5 matches, PK-35 conceded 4 goals, while both teams scored in 20% of those games, supporting a cautious assessment of Haka’s chances of finding the net. On the other hand, Haka have averaged 1.46 goals per match and recorded an xG of 1.82 across their last 5 appearances, so the visitors’ defense could be breached. PK-35 have greater scoring potential, averaging 1.83 goals, while Haka concede 1.23 per match and 1.8 recently. Despite these arguments in favor of goals, PK-35’s exceptionally low rate of matches in which both teams score makes BTTS - No more likely: at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 83% of PK-35 matches and 69% of Haka matches. The visitors kept a clean sheet in 83% of the matches covered by these statistics, limiting the hosts’ chances of a high scoring return despite their average of 1.46 goals scored. On the other hand, Haka concede an average of 1.23 goals, while PK-35 score 1.83, so a very low-scoring game is not a foregone conclusion either. Both teams went over 2.5 goals in 60% of their last five matches, but the season-long figures were 54% and 42%, respectively. Therefore, the 2.4-goal projection points to a stronger likelihood of under 3.5 goals, although recent form calls for caution.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

PK-35 led at the break in 50% of matches, compared with just 23% for Haka, making an away lead at half-time the most likely single scenario. The visitors average 0.92 goals before the break, versus 0.54 for the hosts, and concede just 0.17 goals per match during that period. PK-35’s record supports the likelihood of them holding their lead: they have won 75% of matches and kept a clean sheet in 83%, compared with 38% and 23%, respectively, for Haka. PK-35 have not conceded in the second halves covered by the season statistics, while Haka concede an average of 0.77 goals after the break. A draw at half-time remains a significant alternative, having occurred in 42% of the visitors’ matches; however, their more frequent leads and strong defense point primarily to an HT/FT result of 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

65Possession (%)35
HakaPK-35
24Shots2
HakaPK-35
8Shots on target0
HakaPK-35
2.71xG0.48
HakaPK-35
11Corners1
HakaPK-35
89Dangerous attacks48
HakaPK-35
6Fouls18
HakaPK-35
0Cards2
HakaPK-35

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.88Goals scored / game1.64
HakaPK-35
1.16Goals allowed / game0.72
HakaPK-35
55%Average possession42%
HakaPK-35
5Shots on target / game4
HakaPK-35

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.24Shots per game11.48
HakaPK-35
5Shots on target4
HakaPK-35
14.2%Shot conversion14.3%
HakaPK-35
55%Possession42%
HakaPK-35
1.66xG for1.42
HakaPK-35
1.23xG against1.36
HakaPK-35

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingPK-35: Counter-attacking
HakaPK-35
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PK-35 is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Haka · 1.6 pts / game - PK-35

Haka
LLDWL
Season result split
52% W20% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-7
1.76 pts / game · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
PK-35
WDWLD
Season result split
56% W28% D16% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-7-4
1.96 pts / game · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
9-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 15% better for: goals scored per game.

1.88 goals / game - Haka · 1.64 goals / game - PK-35

PK-35 is 61% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.16 goals / game - Haka · 0.72 goals / game - PK-35

Haka scoring profile: strong

Haka scores in 84% of games (21 of 25 games), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 games).

PK-35 scoring profile: strong

PK-35 scores in 72% of games (18 of 25 games), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 games).

47Goals scored (season)41
HakaPK-35
29Goals conceded (season)18
HakaPK-35
3.04Average goals per game2.36
HakaPK-35
7Goals scored (last 5)7
HakaPK-35
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
HakaPK-35

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal72%
HakaPK-35
64%2 goals40%
HakaPK-35
24%3 goals36%
HakaPK-35
12%4 goals12%
HakaPK-35

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal48%
HakaPK-35
40%2 goals12%
HakaPK-35
8%3 goals8%
HakaPK-35
0%4 goals4%
HakaPK-35

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time12%
HakaPK-35
8%BTTS in both halves4%
HakaPK-35
44%Scored in both halves28%
HakaPK-35

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
HakaPK-35
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS24%
HakaPK-35
60%BTTS - last 520%
HakaPK-35

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
HakaPK-35
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
HakaPK-35
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
HakaPK-35

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
HakaPK-35
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
HakaPK-35
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
HakaPK-35

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haka - half-time state
44% leading20% draw36% trailing
PK-35 - half-time state
36% leading48% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per game (1st half)1.56
HakaPK-35
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.72
HakaPK-35
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
HakaPK-35
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.04
HakaPK-35
52%Clean sheet before half-time72%
HakaPK-35
44%No goal before half-time60%
HakaPK-35

After half-time (2nd half)

1.84Points per game (2nd half)1.76
HakaPK-35
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
HakaPK-35
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
HakaPK-35
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.32
HakaPK-35
52%Clean sheet after half-time68%
HakaPK-35
28%No goal after half-time40%
HakaPK-35

Haka - second-half results

48% W40% D12% L
38
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PK-35 - second-half results

44% W44% D12% L
39
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Haka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
PK-35 - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game1.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Haka
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
9
3
16-30
7
4
31-45
7
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
13
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
11
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.96
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaPK-35
Average goals per game▲ 3.042.57▼ 2.36
Both teams scored▲ 56%46%▼ 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%46%▲ 48%
Clean sheets• 32%31%▲ 52%
Goal before half-time▲ 84%66%▼ 56%
Goal after half-time▲ 84%74%▼ 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Maximo TolonenOff: Emu Kawakita
  2. HakaSubstitutionOn: Kevin NurmiOff: Elias Mattila
  3. PK-35Yellow cardJasper Pikkuhookana
  4. HakaSubstitutionOn: Topi LehtinenOff: Mamoudou Cissé
  5. PK-35Yellow cardJoona Tapani
  6. HakaSubstitutionOn: Torfiq Ali-AbubakarOff: Aapo Mäenpää

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Haka's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against PK-35. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Haka vs PK-35?

The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 3:0 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Haka and PK-35?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Haka won 1, PK-35 won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs PK-35?

Haka score 1.88 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.64. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Haka's matches and 36% of PK-35's.

What form are Haka and PK-35 in?

Over the last 5 games Haka have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and PK-35 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs PK-35?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.