Norway - EliteserienData current as of 19 July 2026

HamKam vs Viking: match statistics

HamKam crest
HamKam
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Viking crest
Viking
120%(4.60)
X25%(4.00)
255%(1.60)

Viking presents outstanding form with a streak of five consecutive wins and an impressive 14:2 goal record in the last five matches, which translates to the maximum number of points (15) and an average of 3.0 points per game. HamKam is in much worse disposition with a 2-0-3 record in the last five encounters, earning only 1.2 points per game and an even goal record of 9:9. The difference in form is huge - Viking is winning all of their recent matches, while HamKam has lost three of their last five encounters. The position in the table also speaks in favor of the visitors - HamKam occupies 5th place, and Viking, despite being in 15th position, shows a decidedly better current disposition. Considering the advantage in form, offensive efficiency, and defensive solidity of Viking, the visitors are the clear favorites of this clash.

HamKam vs Viking: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

HamKam play Viking in Eliteserien (Norway). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

HamKam: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Viking: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

HamKam scores 1.67 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Viking scores 2.58 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: HamKam 75%, Viking 58%. Over 2.5: HamKam 75%, Viking 75%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Viking has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.34. HamKam: 11.3 shots per match, Viking: 15.3.

Match halves

HamKam: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.08. Viking: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.17.

Goals by minute

HamKam: 76-90+ (7 goals). Viking: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 0-1-3. Average goals 4.75, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Viking presents outstanding form with a streak of five consecutive wins and an impressive 14:2 goal record in the last five matches, which translates to the maximum number of points (15) and an average of 3.0 points per game. HamKam is in much worse disposition with a 2-0-3 record in the last five encounters, earning only 1.2 points per game and an even goal record of 9:9. The difference in form is huge - Viking is winning all of their recent matches, while HamKam has lost three of their last five encounters. The position in the table also speaks in favor of the visitors - HamKam occupies 5th place, and Viking, despite being in 15th position, shows a decidedly better current disposition. Considering the advantage in form, offensive efficiency, and defensive solidity of Viking, the visitors are the clear favorites of this clash.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
HamKamViking
11Shots18
HamKamViking
4Shots on target4
HamKamViking
1.25xG1.88
HamKamViking
6Corners11
HamKamViking
38Dangerous attacks65
HamKamViking
14Fouls14
HamKamViking
3Cards2
HamKamViking

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.67Goals scored / match2.58
HamKamViking
1.83Goals conceded / match1
HamKamViking
46%Average possession51%
HamKamViking
4.42Shots on target / match5.58
HamKamViking

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.33Shots per match15.33
HamKamViking
4.42Shots on target5.58
HamKamViking
14.7%Shot conversion16.8%
HamKamViking
46%Possession51%
HamKamViking
1.34xG for1.77
HamKamViking
1.7xG against1.16
HamKamViking

Shooting quality

HamKam: Counter-attackingViking: Attacking
HamKamViking
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Viking is 140% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - HamKam · 2.4 pts / match - Viking

HamKam
LWDDL
Season result split
42% W25% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-4
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Viking
WWWLW
Season result split
83% W0% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-0-2
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-2
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Viking is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - HamKam · 2.58 goals / match - Viking

Viking is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.83 goals / match - HamKam · 1 goals / match - Viking

HamKam scoring profile: very strong

HamKam scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Viking keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Viking scoring profile: very strong

Viking scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while HamKam keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

20Goals scored (season)31
HamKamViking
22Goals conceded (season)12
HamKamViking
3.5Average goals in match3.58
HamKamViking
8Goals scored (last 5)12
HamKamViking
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
HamKamViking

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal92%
HamKamViking
50%2 goals75%
HamKamViking
8%3 goals42%
HamKamViking
8%4 goals25%
HamKamViking

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal67%
HamKamViking
50%2 goals25%
HamKamViking
25%3 goals8%
HamKamViking
25%4 goals0%
HamKamViking

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time33%
HamKamViking
8%BTTS in both halves8%
HamKamViking
25%Scored in both halves75%
HamKamViking

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
HamKamViking
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
HamKamViking
80%BTTS - last 560%
HamKamViking

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
HamKamViking
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
HamKamViking
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time42%
HamKamViking

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
HamKamViking
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
HamKamViking
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
HamKamViking

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Viking is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - HamKam · 2.25 pts / match - Viking

HamKam - half-time state
33% leading25% draw42% trailing
Viking - half-time state
75% leading0% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)2.25
HamKamViking
0.58Goals scored (1st half)1.42
HamKamViking
0.92Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
HamKamViking
1.5Average goals (1st half)2.08
HamKamViking
42%Clean sheet before half-time58%
HamKamViking
58%No goal before half-time8%
HamKamViking

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.83
HamKamViking
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
HamKamViking
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
HamKamViking
2Average goals (2nd half)1.5
HamKamViking
42%Clean sheet after half-time67%
HamKamViking
17%No goal after half-time25%
HamKamViking

HamKam - second-half results

42% W42% R17% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Viking - second-half results

42% W58% R0% P
27
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

HamKam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Viking - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

HamKam
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
2
1
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Viking
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
6
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
5
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
92%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

HamKam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Viking

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.81
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
222%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

HamKamLigaViking
Average goals in match 3.502.95 3.58
Both teams scored 75%55% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%57% 75%
Clean sheets 25%24% 33%
Goal before half-time 83%82% 100%
Goal after half-time 83%78% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): HamKam 0 - 1 - 3 Viking. Average goals 4.75, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Viking FK
3 : 0
Hamarkameratene Fotball
Hamarkameratene Fotball
2 : 5
Viking FK
Hamarkameratene Fotball
3 : 3
Viking FK
Viking FK
3 : 0
Hamarkameratene Fotball

FAQ

What was the result of HamKam vs Viking?

The Eliteserien match finished HamKam 2:1 Viking. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between HamKam and Viking?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches HamKam won 0, Viking won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before HamKam vs Viking?

HamKam score 1.67 goals per game on average and Viking 2.58. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 75% of HamKam's matches and 58% of Viking's.

What form are HamKam and Viking in?

Over the last 5 games HamKam have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Viking 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HamKam vs Viking?

The statistical background for HamKam vs Viking — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.